Spot on. The videos clearly show explosions on the floors, coming out windows before the collapse. There are also multiple pictures of the twin towers main support beams cut at an angle. This is right after the event and not during cleanup. Anyone who has watched shows on controlled demolitions has seen these shape charges being used to take out the supports, but the videos that show the explosions in bldg 7 before the collapse sealed it for me.
Being severed at a 45-degree angle is exactly what is to be expected from a compressive shear failure. You can work it out yourself, if you understand shear and the strength of materials. No "cutting" necessary; only structural overload.
The compression of air from downfalling upper stories will blow out windows easily.
You guys are easy to dupe, when you don't know the subject matter.
Not really. His "sources" typically come from Wikipedia and enjoys speaking down to others to assert his authority...as that last sentence demonstrates. Shill, nothing more.
I'm gonna guess a controlled detonation.
Spot on. The videos clearly show explosions on the floors, coming out windows before the collapse. There are also multiple pictures of the twin towers main support beams cut at an angle. This is right after the event and not during cleanup. Anyone who has watched shows on controlled demolitions has seen these shape charges being used to take out the supports, but the videos that show the explosions in bldg 7 before the collapse sealed it for me.
Being severed at a 45-degree angle is exactly what is to be expected from a compressive shear failure. You can work it out yourself, if you understand shear and the strength of materials. No "cutting" necessary; only structural overload.
The compression of air from downfalling upper stories will blow out windows easily.
You guys are easy to dupe, when you don't know the subject matter.
User name checks out
Not really. His "sources" typically come from Wikipedia and enjoys speaking down to others to assert his authority...as that last sentence demonstrates. Shill, nothing more.
I would like to say that. My suspicion is that.
But the best i can say is it wasn't due to fire based on Dr. Hulsey's UAF INE study: https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
I am intrigued with the DEW theory.
the lateral ejections of WTC1 and WTC2 make it unlikely.