But the beauty is that the buck stops at the President. No matter who was behind the real decisions, tough questions should be asked to Clinton and then the questions must be expanded to include the shadow figures who were controlling him.
But the beauty is that the buck stops at the President
Does it, or are you just saying it as it should be?
Just like how Pres. Trump ordered pulling out of Syria and was ignored, the problem clearly exists with unelected bureaucracy regardless of whether or not the President signs off on it.
My curiosity was peaked when they started talking about AI soldiers. Genetic modification and Elon’s chips. I’m still swirling about that part. Can’t wrap my head around it yet.
He asserts that Clinton personally told him their bid to join NATO will be rejected.
Yes, after going and talking to his people. Which would definitely include a CIA director.
But the beauty is that the buck stops at the President. No matter who was behind the real decisions, tough questions should be asked to Clinton and then the questions must be expanded to include the shadow figures who were controlling him.
Does it, or are you just saying it as it should be?
Just like how Pres. Trump ordered pulling out of Syria and was ignored, the problem clearly exists with unelected bureaucracy regardless of whether or not the President signs off on it.
My curiosity was peaked when they started talking about AI soldiers. Genetic modification and Elon’s chips. I’m still swirling about that part. Can’t wrap my head around it yet.
Normies _believe _ it stops there. So in this case, they will be forced to question why he would be controlled by other people.