The Dems are funding her and hoping to keep her in there as their Manchurian candidate, because she will absolutely sell out to them.
They know Biden is dead in the water. But first, they have to keep her in there as a 'back-up' Republican candidate while they try to take down the clear favorite DJT.
Look at it in a slightly different perspective. Think of it as a series of "fallbacks".
RFK Jr was a fallback. Ron was a fallback. Vivek was a fallback. Nikki is a fallback. When all these collapse then they have to activate the next sequence of fallbacks: Gruesome, Big Mike, and whoever else is on the ice.
When all those fallbacks collapse, then comes the final fallback - WW3, fake nuke attack, financial collapse - aka - precipice.
What we are watching unfold right now can be titled "Forced March to the Precipice"
Good point. Similar tactic to obfuscate a defeat and move on to the next glorious victory as we see in the war in Ukraine. She will be proclaimed as equally unimportant as Adveeka or Mariupol or Bahkmut.
But what do we make of it if she does continue on?
More powerful candidates have fallen like dominoes, not just now but also in 2016. Nimrata is not any special. If she continues on, then it just means the Cabal puppets need more time to get their ducks lined up on the "march to the precipice" and the WHs are giving them time by dangling her.
I dont think she gets past this Saturday and her blow out loss in her home State.
But what do we make of it if she does continue on? Why is she really there? Who is really funding her?
Shes not making a dent in Trump, that much is obvious.
What if she’s the scapegoat to expose the MIC?
The Dems are funding her and hoping to keep her in there as their Manchurian candidate, because she will absolutely sell out to them.
They know Biden is dead in the water. But first, they have to keep her in there as a 'back-up' Republican candidate while they try to take down the clear favorite DJT.
That is the plan as I see it.
If it is the plan sure seems less than effective, doesnt it?
Look at it in a slightly different perspective. Think of it as a series of "fallbacks".
RFK Jr was a fallback. Ron was a fallback. Vivek was a fallback. Nikki is a fallback. When all these collapse then they have to activate the next sequence of fallbacks: Gruesome, Big Mike, and whoever else is on the ice.
When all those fallbacks collapse, then comes the final fallback - WW3, fake nuke attack, financial collapse - aka - precipice.
What we are watching unfold right now can be titled "Forced March to the Precipice"
Good point. Similar tactic to obfuscate a defeat and move on to the next glorious victory as we see in the war in Ukraine. She will be proclaimed as equally unimportant as Adveeka or Mariupol or Bahkmut.
More powerful candidates have fallen like dominoes, not just now but also in 2016. Nimrata is not any special. If she continues on, then it just means the Cabal puppets need more time to get their ducks lined up on the "march to the precipice" and the WHs are giving them time by dangling her.