So world war 1 could not have driven 6 million jews ( along with millions of others) into poverty and starvation ? Only to be followed by the final solution in number 2? Can you tell me what the Jewish population was during that time? Was the number rounded up or down?
And I agree we have never been told the truth about anything, since we stepped out of our caves.
Before WW II there were some 15,250,000 Jews, Planet wide, meaning all around the Planet, per the Red Cross Records....
AFTER WW II, there were some 15,400,000 PLUS Jews World Wide....
IF they had 6 Million killed off, this would Not be the case, and there's No Possible Way that they had 6 Million Babies in such short order as to keep their Numbers level all of that time....
It's the same lie as ""World Overpopulation"", it is impossible for the Planetary Population to have jumped from some ~2 Billion people in 1900, to 8 Billion in 2000....
Even in using the United Nations own Head Count Numbers, India doesn't have 1 Billion People, but rather some 700,000, it's close, but no cigar....
And I suspect that China also doesn't have 1 Billion People, especially with their 1 Child per Family policy from the last 70 years....
Well, one of the articles claimed that 6 million was half the entire Jewish population at the time. So if that were the case, and Hitler took care of the other 6 million, there would be none. Also, I personally never learned about WWI taking out that many Jews and you'd think that would be a big deal and we would have heard about it at least as much as we've heard about the 6 million lost in WWII. I have no idea if 6 million is wrong and if it is, what the actual number is (although I have seen reports on this board estimating the true number at around 268K.) Anyway, I have no idea what the number is and I'm not even sure that it matters, because even if it were "only" 100k that were treated that way it would still be 100K too many. But surely you're intelligent enough (?) to understand I was answering a question.
100k could paid to join some type of experiment…
Just look at home many volunteer to be experiment on vaccines… I can’t imagine line up to be Jab for fries or 🍩 … even though I was so tempted to give for the million dollars lottery
So world war 1 could not have driven 6 million jews ( along with millions of others) into poverty and starvation ? Only to be followed by the final solution in number 2? Can you tell me what the Jewish population was during that time? Was the number rounded up or down? And I agree we have never been told the truth about anything, since we stepped out of our caves.
Link will not open, it just times out....
Everything's just a bit weird on the Dot Wins....
Before WW II there were some 15,250,000 Jews, Planet wide, meaning all around the Planet, per the Red Cross Records....
AFTER WW II, there were some 15,400,000 PLUS Jews World Wide....
IF they had 6 Million killed off, this would Not be the case, and there's No Possible Way that they had 6 Million Babies in such short order as to keep their Numbers level all of that time....
It's the same lie as ""World Overpopulation"", it is impossible for the Planetary Population to have jumped from some ~2 Billion people in 1900, to 8 Billion in 2000....
Even in using the United Nations own Head Count Numbers, India doesn't have 1 Billion People, but rather some 700,000, it's close, but no cigar....
And I suspect that China also doesn't have 1 Billion People, especially with their 1 Child per Family policy from the last 70 years....
Well, one of the articles claimed that 6 million was half the entire Jewish population at the time. So if that were the case, and Hitler took care of the other 6 million, there would be none. Also, I personally never learned about WWI taking out that many Jews and you'd think that would be a big deal and we would have heard about it at least as much as we've heard about the 6 million lost in WWII. I have no idea if 6 million is wrong and if it is, what the actual number is (although I have seen reports on this board estimating the true number at around 268K.) Anyway, I have no idea what the number is and I'm not even sure that it matters, because even if it were "only" 100k that were treated that way it would still be 100K too many. But surely you're intelligent enough (?) to understand I was answering a question.
100k could paid to join some type of experiment… Just look at home many volunteer to be experiment on vaccines… I can’t imagine line up to be Jab for fries or 🍩 … even though I was so tempted to give for the million dollars lottery