I have been reading the Geneva Bible--the Bible that the pilgrims brought with them to America. It predates the King James Bible by roughly 50 years and the KJV translators made ample use of the Geneva Bible. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but in Chapter 9 is the discussion of the blowing of the 5th trumpet. (I'm standardizing the spelling here because the Geneva Bible has no J's, the u's are v's, the s's sometimes look like f's, etc.)
-
And there came out of the smoke Locusts upon the earth; and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. [Like the sting of a needle maybe?]
-
And it was commanded them, that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree: but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads. [a footnote for this verse regarding the men in question says: "That is, the infidels whom Satan blindeth with the efficacy of error." (Interesting word choice there: "efficacy" of error, since "efficacy" is a word generally used now in relation to medicine. And we certainly saw a lot of people blinded by MSM and the whole COVID puppeteers who certainly seem to be working for Satan)]
-
And to them was commanded that they should not kill them, but that they should be vexed five months, and that their pain should be as the pain that cometh of a scorpion, when he hath stung a man. [one of the footnotes for this verse: "The elect for a certain space and at times are in troubles: for the grasshoppers endure but from April to September, which is five months." Another footnote regarding the sting: "For at the beginning, the sting of their conscience once seemeth as nothing, but except they soon seek remedy, they perish." This reminds me of all the discussion of venom and other poisons being in the vaccines.]
-
Therefore in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it, and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.
-
And the form of the locusts was like unto horses prepared unto battle, and on their heads were, as it were, crowns, like unto gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. [Crown like "corona"? Faces like men like manmade maybe?]
-
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. [Hair like the blood clots maybe?]
-
And they had habbergions [a type of chainmail armor apparently], like to the habbergions of iron: and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots when many horses run into battle.
-
And they had tails like unto scorpions and there were stings in their tails & their power was to hurt men five months. [Footnote on stings in this one: "To infect & kill with their venomous doctrine." The Geneva Bible translators were seeing this all as allegory, but what if it was maybe also more literal than they imagined?]
-
And they have a King over them, which is the Angel of the bottomless pit, whose name is Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is named Apollyon. [Footnote for this verse for the word "Angel": "That is, destroyer, which is Antichrist, the Pope, king of hypocrites & Satan's ambassador." The pilgrims where very early protestants, so they weren't fans of the Catholic Pope.]
-
One woe is past, and behold, yet two woes come after this.
-
The the sixth Angel blew the trumpet & I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden alter, which is before God,
-
Saying to the sixth Angel, which had the trumpet, Loose the four Angels, which are bound in the great river Euphrates. [Footnote on this: "Meaning the enemies of the East country, which should afflict the Church of God, as did the Arabians, Sarasines, Turks, and Tartarians." (It mentions TARTARIANS in the footnote. Interesting!)]
-
And the four Angels were loosed, which were prepared at an hour, at a day, at a month, and at a year, to slay the third part of men.
Is it just me or does this sound a lot like the unleashing of the coronavirus on humanity?
I really like this metaphor.
The important thing to keep in mind when researching is, there are two sides; We The People and the Powers That Be. All other "sides," be they nations, corporations, organizations, leaders, ideologies, systems of government, religions, etc. that we see are created, or if derived organically, subverted by them to promote the Illusion. As far as I have found, not one single thing has escaped this control system.
The primary method of control is in the control of all of the systems of information (media, school, book publishers, trusted leaders/experts, etc.). Information control is the key. Look at who controls the information, and you understand who controls the world and how. Having said that, it can be quite difficult figuring that out because it is well hidden. You have to know pretty much exactly what to look for before you go looking.
This is my most fervent hope. I feel like I'm in the middle of the final season of the greatest story ever told. I really hope I make it to the end, and that the ending doesn't suck.
I agree with you on the control of information. I remember when I ready 1984 (in 1984 actually, iirc), one of the things I kept thinking was "Well, they can't go back and change all of the books. That would be impossible." And then along came the Ipads and the tablets and I thought, "THAT'S how they'll do it. THAT'S how they'll change the books." Which is why I still buy actual books. If we get to the Fahrenheit 451 stage (which we hopefully will not), that's when I will have to get creative on how to save the books. I'll be like Sean Connery's William of Baskerville at the end of The Name of the Rose: trying to know quickly which books to grab first to save from the fire. The Geneva Bible, for sure. And 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 and Zamiatin's We and on and on.
That's the other thing I have hope about when these Luciferian cultists have been expelled from our realm: the rebirth of literature and music. How many great works of music and literature have not been made because of the cult control of the music industry and publishing? It's truly tragic.
The same people have been in charge of what books get published and/or become popular since the creation of the printing press (really before that). It is possible to publish your own work, but if it isn't pushed by the media, no one will ever hear of it. "Word of mouth" just doesn't work except on very rare occasions. If word of mouth does work and something becomes too popular, all you need to do is "debunk" it, or if that is impossible, "make controversial" whatever is contained within the book. Once that happens, all it takes is a few years and the "controversial" or "hoax" book becomes either something no one remembers/has heard of, or is "forbidden" reading.
One example of a book that got pushed organically I think (Word of Mouth publishing) is the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It was way to popular for a book the Cabal didn't control, so along comes Allen Dulles to "debunk" it. If you aren't aware (or don't know the whole story), Mr. Allen Dulles was Rockefeller's personal lawyer, one of his top men in fact, and also the primary creator of the CIA. It was he who proved that the Protocols of Zion was a "hoax" in 1921 making it forbidden reading. No one can touch that book now. Most people, even those here won't even read it. It's considered to be radioactive, even though I think it is one of the most important books to read to understand what is going on in the world. If you quote it, or even mention the name without vilifying it, you are basically a genocidal psychopathic mouthbreather who can't wait for the semi-annual Nazi Revival Festival.
You don't have to burn books to burn books out of the consciousness of society.
The internet makes it almost trivial to hide information, but these same methods of controlling information by destroying books, or making it it "heretical," or "anti-Semitic" or "conspiracy theory," etc. have been going on for millennia, done by the same group of people the whole time.
I wrote a book in the 80s that is listed on Amazon today, even though I've never sold a single copy online. Even as late as a week or two ago, I was getting emails from people who were referred to me, as I am the top expert in that little field of study.
BTW, Amazon used to advertise about how many books were listed in their database. What they failed to mention is that they couldn't possibly sell you most of them. They are merely database entries. I think my book entry is probably from a library listing somewhere in the US. Oddly, subsequent editions aren't listed at all.
What is the topic of your book, if I may ask?
The globalists have maybe controlled publishing for a long time, but great literature was at least still written and published in America: Faulkner, Hemingway, Steinbeck, Flannery O'Connor, et al. Now I see mostly crap. The height of good writing nowadays is supposedly Harry Potter. It's disheartening to say the least.
Funny that you mention the Protocols. I have been reading Giorgio Cattaneo's interviews of Mauro Biglino's, which book is titled The Naked Bible. Very interesting reading. Focuses on the actual Hebrew translations, particularly of terms like "Elohim", "Ruach", "Kavod"--words that typically get translated as "God", "Spirit", "Soul". Like I said, interesting reading.
But on page 167 I arrived at this statement: "The legendary historical falsehood of the 'Jewish-Masonic conspiracy' as set out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a document fabricated in 1903 by the Tsar's police, is eerily having a come-back, thanks to a certain contemporary conspiracy frenzy, the same that blames the Rothschild bankers for all the evils in the world." I wrote in the margin next to the Tsar's police statement "Proof?"
So did Allen Dulles "debunk" the Protocols by saying they were written by the Tsar's police? This was the first I had heard the Tsar's police named as the source of the Protocols (which I have not read yet, actually).
To hear you say it was Allen Dulles makes me say, they really are not creative at all. It's always "Russia, Russia, Russia."
The English translations do indeed lose all meaning. Good track to pursue.
Strange that the same man would poohpooh that the Rothschilds run the world through banking. They openly CLAIMED to do it, for crying out loud. What’s anti-semetic about not wanting to serve mammon to a Bible-related author?
All of the authors you mention have direct ties to the Cabal. I'm not saying their work had nefarious intent, nor am I saying that "ties" equals complicity, but those ties are there, and for some they are quite profound. Further, I can make a case that many of their works were used as a form of social engineering by the Cabal. Regardless of intent all of their work was all allowed by the Cabal, indeed, promoted by it.
None of those authors would have made it big without Cabal allowance or intent. That is the key to understanding the system. It isn't that "everything is evil" (though far more than you might appreciate), it's that everything is controlled by Gatekeepers. Everything is allowed by the Gatekeepers or it doesn't exist at all in the public sphere. Anyone can create anything within one of the allowed boxes (there are many). If it pushes outside of the allowed boxes, it is nixed.
I'll have to check it out.
It was, according to history, written by Sergei Nilus. There is nothing that I have found that says he was part of the Tsar’s “police,” but he was a Russian and a member of the Aristocracy, though so was 99+% of everyone in our history books, so that says less than it might seem.
Dulles “debunked” it by saying it was plagiarized from a French work titled Dialogue aux Enfers enire Machiavel et Montequieu, 1865. Later that year Herman Bernstein, who was a disinformation agent for the Cabal, and who had a large influence on the history we got, wrote a book “proving” it a hoax, citing similarities between the two works.
These “debunkings” didn’t take, not because there weren’t some parallels between the two works, there were, but more likely because the parallels between reality and the Protocols were so incredible that it was pretty difficult to gaslight.
To put the idea of the Protocols to rest, they had a well publicized trial in Berne Switzerland, called the Berne Trial. This is the only reference I can find for the Protocols having ties to the “Czar’s Police.” As far as I can see on cursory inspection it was an accusation, not a proof. I don’t know what evidence they had to support it. I haven’t dug into this trial yet. I should probably do that. It would be interesting to see the evidence for both sides.
The reason I haven’t dug in is because it doesn’t really matter who wrote it imo. It is likely impossible to prove it was actually minutes from a Zionist meeting. From my perspective, what is really important about the Protocols is how eerily prophetic it is. Only by making it illegal to read (it was punishable by death in the Soviet Union to own it) can you keep people from reading it and coming to their own conclusion. It isn’t a convincing work because it is “anti-Semitic” (it isn’t actually anti-Semitic, it says explicitly that they use the Jews, their "lesser brethren" for their own purposes), it is convincing because it basically explains all of the evidence that one finds when one actually investigates history for themselves. Like, they make a statement in the Protocols, and when you go to find corroborating evidence it’s all over the place, and everything starts to make sense.
Regardless of original authorship, you can’t have something like that hanging around, thus it was a book that was literally (pun intended) put on trial in such a way that the entire world heard about its “debunking.”
It also set a precedence that said “no matter where you are, if you push this, we'll come after you.”