Here is the [study] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240545772400038X) (N=1.8 million)
Conclusions
This MR study demonstrated no significant causal relationships between red/processed meat intake and the risk of the four CVD outcomes examined. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.
Coverage of this on Epoch Times
Here is an older study (N=29 682) that claimed to have found correlation between redmeat and heart diseases.
Most of the studies were observational not controlled. They would “survey” people and ask them how much red meat they had eaten. Even things like pizza were considered meat because toppings included meat.
Most of the surveyed meat eaters were eating all kinds of crap including sweetbread, sugary crap and all kinds of processed, chemically laden “foods” that were the probable cause of health issues.
Those choosing to eliminate or eat little meat were doing so for health reasons and eliminating all the crap as well.
They never controlled for the crap.
A Whole Foods diet including meat vs a Whole Foods veggie diet that eliminates the crap study needs to be done.
It's also very difficult to control for something that could take a lifetime to see effects.
Unless you are able to put someone into a room and feed them a very controlled diet USSR/CIA style for years, or a lifetime, and replicate this with many test subjects to expand the data samples, it's very difficult to make sweeping statements like that.
On the other hand, we can see the effects of soy very quickly -- at least, in a relative sense.
By adding soy, you can see men -- even thinner men -- grow larger amounts of breast tissue.
By removing soy, you can see men -- even larger men -- have more normal sized breast tissue.
Conditions like heart disease take many years to develop, and sometimes it seems there may be extra conditions that causes it. Plastics? Vaccine injuries? Overconsumption of sugar?
Everything seems to give you a risk of heart disease, so it truly is difficult to nail it down to food.
It doesn't take a lifetime, just some bloodwork. And experts, real experts not our weaponized groups like the American cancer society, or the American heart assoc. but instead, independent dr. to tell us what tests have real meaning. Did you know the American heart Assoc. very quietly took their reference to cholesterol out of their information. It looks like their push for lowering cholesterol was much like the push to take the jab. I think we deserve some answers.
They use confusion to cloud the issues. Humans don't know what there supposed to eat, children don't know if they are a boy or girl. Don't fall for it. If I brought a cow into my backyard, and put out a pile of bird seed, a pile of dog food, the stupid cow would know to eat the grass.
This is another form of medical mind control to make us sick. When you look back at pics from earlier decades, people weren't all fat like they are now.
If I have to see that commercial with the fat singing and dancing chick in the yellow dress, so happy about her diabetes medicine, I'm going to puke. The only thing this woman needs to do is eat healthy meat, and she would stop craving all the crap that is making her sick.
Cholesterol causing health problems is yet another scam.
There is no such thing as "good" or "bad" cholesterol.
It is all good.
The difference between HDL and LDL is directional.
Cholesterol is used to build the membrane of every cell in the body, used to build every hormone in the body, and used to repair things.
LDL is cholesterol that leaves the liver to do the building and repairing. HDL is heading back to the liver, carrying old or unneeded cholesterol so that the liver can recycle it for the next batch.
Glucose molecules (from eating sugar) causes microtears inside the blood vessels, which need to be repaired. Cholesterol is used as the "spackling" like for drywall to repair the tear. After a long time, the build up of cholesterol will close off the blood vessel, which can cause a blood clot.
This can be completely reversed if a person stops eating sugar, as the build-up will slowly dissolve and be carried back to the liver.
But otherwise, the person can die, and then autopsies will show cholesterol build-up which is falsely assumed to be caused by saturated fat and cholesterol in the diet.
The cholesterol was not there to do harm; it was there to heal the damage already done by the sugar intake.
The firemen were there to put the fire out; they did not show up to set the house on fire.
Heart disease does not happen overnight, it happens over years -- a lifetime.
A child will not obtain heart disease by eating the same food that might cause them heart disease later in life.
Exactly, thats why you can't go decades eating this crap food, and then have doctors claiming they don't know what caused it. Or worse, lying that it is the healthy food causing it. There is no excuse that we are not understanding a proper human diet.