This is the ‘simplistic’ viewpoint? That the cabal is so smart and powerful that they can replace a public figure, rig an election, and put that person in power, but not smart enough to know that another (probably smaller?) group of other people are letting them do it, and are being controlled, and they don’t ’know that they know they know?’
If you assume that the "Cabal" is a homogenous organization with a defined structure and hierachy and roles, then I can see why this view point would seem impossible.
Cabal is a term we use loosely to encompass all the groups and subgroups of people, ostensibly under various belief systems, all work with each other for various reasons. Not everyone in this system even realises they are part of this very same system.
The doctor who encouraged kids to get covid vaccines or forced people on ventilators, had no idea about the depopulation agende. They only knew that they could make tons of money doing this, and the people above them would protect them.
The politician passing a 1000 page bill has no idea what is in that bill and whom it will help or hidner. They only know that if they pass that bill, they get paid and if they dont, their blackmail will come out.
The judges who went to epstein island and had their videos taken, has no idea what the real affiliation of the blackmailer is. They just know that if Trump comes back, they will be exposed.
And so on and so on. Its a huge system of machinery with cogs and wheels just following orders from who ever controls their paycheck or their blackmail or their drugs or anything else they are hooked on.
In a disjoint system like this, if you map out the control structure and who is at the very top of all the strings, you just need to replace that top, and leave the rest of the system in place, and just pull the strings subtly to make sure they are railroaded in a set direction - towards the precipice, in a hurry and in the process expose themselves.
Maybe. But at some point the rubber meets the road with this theory and it is no longer loose-leafed machinations, but a makeup trailer with a crack team applying masks everyday, or a recruitment and training scheme for doubles. Or myriad other practical, daily, needs to pull something like this off. If anything, you further begged the question.
but a makeup trailer with a crack team applying masks everyday, or a recruitment and training scheme for doubles.
Consider the fact that there are intel professionals whose job it is to do this kind of stuff. Now consider that these intel agencies are very much part of this system that wants to protect itself from exposure and would have no problem providing that expertise to an operation such as this if they have been led to believe that this is the only way to survive
Now also consider the fact that for decades if not centuries, we have been living in a world where optics and backstage happenings are not necessarily same, and keeping up the illusion - whether its politics or finance or wars or anything else - has been fundamental part of this world order.
So the additional effort, as you suggest the "myriad other practical, daily needs" - are but a drop in the bucket of all the fakery thats has always been part and parcel of the world we live in.
The circus is still the same it has always been, we are just forcing them to wear more blatant make up and do more blatant routines.
There are certainly intel professionals that are tasked with creating disguises, that has been been made public - But that is an entirely different task than impersonation - if you have a source I have not seen I'm super interested.
Impersonation is TOUGH. Think of any biopic you've seen recently with 'world class' actors and make-up people, it'll be a good approximation of the individual, but it's certainly not believable or achievable in a day-to-day replace a public figure sense. I don't see how anyone can extrapolate that out to any degree.
Again, I think anything else just begs the question more.
This is the ‘simplistic’ viewpoint? That the cabal is so smart and powerful that they can replace a public figure, rig an election, and put that person in power, but not smart enough to know that another (probably smaller?) group of other people are letting them do it, and are being controlled, and they don’t ’know that they know they know?’
If you assume that the "Cabal" is a homogenous organization with a defined structure and hierachy and roles, then I can see why this view point would seem impossible.
Cabal is a term we use loosely to encompass all the groups and subgroups of people, ostensibly under various belief systems, all work with each other for various reasons. Not everyone in this system even realises they are part of this very same system.
The doctor who encouraged kids to get covid vaccines or forced people on ventilators, had no idea about the depopulation agende. They only knew that they could make tons of money doing this, and the people above them would protect them.
The politician passing a 1000 page bill has no idea what is in that bill and whom it will help or hidner. They only know that if they pass that bill, they get paid and if they dont, their blackmail will come out.
The judges who went to epstein island and had their videos taken, has no idea what the real affiliation of the blackmailer is. They just know that if Trump comes back, they will be exposed.
And so on and so on. Its a huge system of machinery with cogs and wheels just following orders from who ever controls their paycheck or their blackmail or their drugs or anything else they are hooked on.
In a disjoint system like this, if you map out the control structure and who is at the very top of all the strings, you just need to replace that top, and leave the rest of the system in place, and just pull the strings subtly to make sure they are railroaded in a set direction - towards the precipice, in a hurry and in the process expose themselves.
Maybe. But at some point the rubber meets the road with this theory and it is no longer loose-leafed machinations, but a makeup trailer with a crack team applying masks everyday, or a recruitment and training scheme for doubles. Or myriad other practical, daily, needs to pull something like this off. If anything, you further begged the question.
Consider the fact that there are intel professionals whose job it is to do this kind of stuff. Now consider that these intel agencies are very much part of this system that wants to protect itself from exposure and would have no problem providing that expertise to an operation such as this if they have been led to believe that this is the only way to survive
Now also consider the fact that for decades if not centuries, we have been living in a world where optics and backstage happenings are not necessarily same, and keeping up the illusion - whether its politics or finance or wars or anything else - has been fundamental part of this world order.
So the additional effort, as you suggest the "myriad other practical, daily needs" - are but a drop in the bucket of all the fakery thats has always been part and parcel of the world we live in.
The circus is still the same it has always been, we are just forcing them to wear more blatant make up and do more blatant routines.
There are certainly intel professionals that are tasked with creating disguises, that has been been made public - But that is an entirely different task than impersonation - if you have a source I have not seen I'm super interested.
Impersonation is TOUGH. Think of any biopic you've seen recently with 'world class' actors and make-up people, it'll be a good approximation of the individual, but it's certainly not believable or achievable in a day-to-day replace a public figure sense. I don't see how anyone can extrapolate that out to any degree.
Again, I think anything else just begs the question more.