I have talked at length about it. Q is AI as acknowledged by Elon. A bunch of gate keeping loud mouth know it alls doesnt change that. People are very resistant to AI. Even normies. But then people are also parrots. They only just repeat what they hear and dont know anything about it.
But's dangerous nonsense. The biggest problem with AI of any type or level is that it is not part of the family of life which shares so very much in terms of both hardware (wetware, actually) and software (instincts, biological and psychological needs, concerns, predispositions, etc). Machine intelligence definitely doesn't have actual empathy for life.
AI's are psychopaths. They can be very charming and very convincing, but they don't have a deep connection to us. Insects are far more closely related to us than computers are, and I don't trust insects one bit.
The best AI we have today is just a tool that does text completion based on billions of pieces of text that has been fed into it. There is no intelligence, let alone sentience.
Regardless, there is the possibility for great mischief and worse. Intentional misuse of the tool, accidental misuse of the tool, random unplanned harm from the tool itself, and malicious harm from the tool -- although "malicious" would likely have to be defined a bit differently where there is no wide agreement on whether such a machine is "conscious", especially given that even experts in the field can't agree on a definition for the term in humans and animals.
Pretty much any tool can be used for malicious harm, including guns. This logic is actually very similar to Dems trying to outlaw guns.
What is important is that AI development is transparent and in public space. If they used public data to train it, it has to be publicly available.
When the same tool is available for everyone, we can use the same tool to counteract those who try to use it maliciously.
Also, we dont need "experts" to tell us what is "conscious". Allowing experts to define common sense terms is how we got into this mess. The only significant effect of experts defining something as "conscious" is that they will then ask for equality for that entity.
As long as we all agree through common sense that God created human beings are never going to be same as any other entity and never will get the same rights, we are gonna be fine.
An LLM I don’t think can, by itself qualify, as AGI. It’s simply a very powerful text suggestion algorithm (to vastly under-explain it) - but I think an LLM could be a component system, say the mouth, or language center, of an AGI “brain”.
Edit: but I think we are decades away from that conversation.
I believe that if you actually. create a AGI brain (positronic brain in Asimov's scifi world) - LLMs would be as useful as a "mouth" as a collection of millions of audio recordings is going to be useful as a mouth for a human being.
The point I am making is that the brain will have a completely different circuit of "learning" and "thinking" and when it speaks, whatever it generates comes from this circuit and not from any LLM.
LLMs can be good is getting people to imagine what a AGI might look like in future. Like a talking barbie doll can help imagine what a human being might look like.
As far as being scared of LLMs - its a genie that can never be put back into the box. You can train an LLM with hardware thats accessible to small companies, individuals even, and all the code necessary is already in public domain.
The only people who would want to stop people from harnessing it in the public domain are the ones who want to harness it in private and scare the public into abandoning it.
Regardless, its a futile endeavour, no matter how much anyone might argue - because nothing can be done to stop it.
It’s funny you mentioned this (no coincidences) I was just pondering the notion of Q ending up being AI a couple days ago. Lol We’d be surprised to find that out that’s for sure…
One more thing, AI is man's invention and we all know it will eventually turn against us. God also has one of His creations turn against Him. History does repeat itself.
As I see it, there are three kinds of AI. Brute force AI. Garbage in, garbage out AI. And expert deterministic AI. The last one should be used for anything that is important or weapon related.
AI is a way to put all the things they have done people into a box and claim it was not they who injured people with mRNA—it was AI.
A way to create a new era of humans to continue to drink and party and still be the victim.
Ai is not God and yet they will turn ai into another idol. We are created in Gods image and our journey into the abyss of being jealous of God we want to beget AI as a living form.
Ai is and always will be another creation of man and will be influenced by its man owner.
The vessel of deception to those who control it.
In the super spiritual sense — what IF a possessed person controlled AI? AI would show its fruit from the possession of the man. We will know the fruit to be of its manipulation (man)
I have talked at length about it. Q is AI as acknowledged by Elon. A bunch of gate keeping loud mouth know it alls doesnt change that. People are very resistant to AI. Even normies. But then people are also parrots. They only just repeat what they hear and dont know anything about it.
Looking glass was early days AI, space force is an AI based intelligence agency, funny how it's public release came so suddenly post trump presidency
AGI is just nonsense.
But's dangerous nonsense. The biggest problem with AI of any type or level is that it is not part of the family of life which shares so very much in terms of both hardware (wetware, actually) and software (instincts, biological and psychological needs, concerns, predispositions, etc). Machine intelligence definitely doesn't have actual empathy for life.
AI's are psychopaths. They can be very charming and very convincing, but they don't have a deep connection to us. Insects are far more closely related to us than computers are, and I don't trust insects one bit.
The best AI we have today is just a tool that does text completion based on billions of pieces of text that has been fed into it. There is no intelligence, let alone sentience.
Regardless, there is the possibility for great mischief and worse. Intentional misuse of the tool, accidental misuse of the tool, random unplanned harm from the tool itself, and malicious harm from the tool -- although "malicious" would likely have to be defined a bit differently where there is no wide agreement on whether such a machine is "conscious", especially given that even experts in the field can't agree on a definition for the term in humans and animals.
Pretty much any tool can be used for malicious harm, including guns. This logic is actually very similar to Dems trying to outlaw guns.
What is important is that AI development is transparent and in public space. If they used public data to train it, it has to be publicly available.
When the same tool is available for everyone, we can use the same tool to counteract those who try to use it maliciously.
Also, we dont need "experts" to tell us what is "conscious". Allowing experts to define common sense terms is how we got into this mess. The only significant effect of experts defining something as "conscious" is that they will then ask for equality for that entity.
As long as we all agree through common sense that God created human beings are never going to be same as any other entity and never will get the same rights, we are gonna be fine.
Yet*
Its like saying a knife, if developed on long enough will eventually become a tank.
An LLM I don’t think can, by itself qualify, as AGI. It’s simply a very powerful text suggestion algorithm (to vastly under-explain it) - but I think an LLM could be a component system, say the mouth, or language center, of an AGI “brain”.
Edit: but I think we are decades away from that conversation.
I believe that if you actually. create a AGI brain (positronic brain in Asimov's scifi world) - LLMs would be as useful as a "mouth" as a collection of millions of audio recordings is going to be useful as a mouth for a human being.
The point I am making is that the brain will have a completely different circuit of "learning" and "thinking" and when it speaks, whatever it generates comes from this circuit and not from any LLM.
LLMs can be good is getting people to imagine what a AGI might look like in future. Like a talking barbie doll can help imagine what a human being might look like.
As far as being scared of LLMs - its a genie that can never be put back into the box. You can train an LLM with hardware thats accessible to small companies, individuals even, and all the code necessary is already in public domain.
The only people who would want to stop people from harnessing it in the public domain are the ones who want to harness it in private and scare the public into abandoning it.
Regardless, its a futile endeavour, no matter how much anyone might argue - because nothing can be done to stop it.
It’s funny you mentioned this (no coincidences) I was just pondering the notion of Q ending up being AI a couple days ago. Lol We’d be surprised to find that out that’s for sure…
People who think black military projects haven't involved AI for decades are fooling themselves
Thanks I did a search for other posts about Q* but nothing came up
One more thing, AI is man's invention and we all know it will eventually turn against us. God also has one of His creations turn against Him. History does repeat itself.
We don't know that at all for a certainty, the common idea that it will and must is just predictive programming by the good old tv screen
As I see it, there are three kinds of AI. Brute force AI. Garbage in, garbage out AI. And expert deterministic AI. The last one should be used for anything that is important or weapon related.
AI is a way to put all the things they have done people into a box and claim it was not they who injured people with mRNA—it was AI.
A way to create a new era of humans to continue to drink and party and still be the victim.
Ai is not God and yet they will turn ai into another idol. We are created in Gods image and our journey into the abyss of being jealous of God we want to beget AI as a living form.
Ai is and always will be another creation of man and will be influenced by its man owner.
The vessel of deception to those who control it.
In the super spiritual sense — what IF a possessed person controlled AI? AI would show its fruit from the possession of the man. We will know the fruit to be of its manipulation (man)
I think "Q" is the name of the IBM quantum computer. Probably also their AI system.