Why didn't McAfee recuse himself from this case? Fani Willis used to be his boss - that seems like a conflict of interest to me. What was the timeline on his appointment to this judgeship? Was it recently enough to imply collusion with the DA? Even though he ruled partially in Trump's favor, that could be just to throw the hounds off the scent. I don't trust McAfee.

A Georgia judge has partially sided with former President Donald Trump by dismissing some of the charges in the bogus election interference case.

It can be recalled that the bogus racketeering case in Atlanta against former President Donald J. Trump and others has been assigned to Scott F. McAfee, a recently appointed Fulton County Superior Court judge who once served under Soros-funded Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

Soros-funded District Attorney Fani Willis returned ten junk indictments against President Donald Trump for questioning the 2020 stolen election—a right protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

President Donald Trump, alongside 18 others, was indicted on a total of 41 charges, with Trump facing 13 counts last year, a blatant attack on those who dared to challenge the integrity of the 2020 election. Additionally, 30 unindicted co-conspirators are being scrutinized for their role in exposing election irregularities.

I came here to post this story - glad I saw it posted already. Sticky request sent to mods.

Hi fren,

this is a duplicate story:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5I9qXi/georgua-judge-overseeing-2020-el/c/

Here's the order.

Bottom line based a quick read. The counts below have been quashed as separate charges. But are still considered overt acts of the conspiracy.

The judge said he quashed the charges because they did not give enough details of how each charge was committed for the defendants to send themselves, but the standard for overt act is lower.

He also noted

This does not mean the entire indictment is dismissed.

The State may also seek a reindictment supplementing these six counts.

So if they could go back to a new grand jury to get more details and write up a new Indictment. They have 6 months of they choose to do that.

Dismissed charges

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24478997-fulton-county-v-trump-order • Count Two alleges that multiple Defendants solicited elected members of the Georgia Senate to violate their oaths of office on December 3, 2020, by requesting or importuning them to unlawfully appoint presidential electors;

• Count Five alleges that Defendant Trump solicited the Speaker of the Georgia House of Representatives to violate his oath of office on December 7, 2020, by requesting or importuning him to call a special session to unlawfully appoint presidential electors

• Count Six alleges that Defendants Smith and Giuliani solicited members of the Georgia House of Representatives to violate their oaths of office on December 10, 2020, by requesting or importuning them to unlawfully appoint presidential electors;

• Count 23 alleges that multiple Defendants solicited elected members of the Georgia Senate to violate their oaths of office on December 30, 2020, by requesting or importuning them to unlawfully appoint presidential electors; • Count 28 alleges that Defendants Trump and Meadows solicited the Georgia Secretary of State to violate his oath of office on January 2, 2021, by requesting or importuning him to unlawfully influence the certified election returns; and

• Count 38 alleges that Defendant Trump solicited the Georgia Secretary of State to violate his oath of office on September 17, 2021, by requesting or importuning him to unlawfully decertify the election.

The order allows for the possibility that prosecutors, led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, may return to the grand jury to seek a new indictment on the dismissed charges.

As close to double jeopardy as you can get!

I'm throwing some indictments out but try, try again!

The fact this judge mccafee didn't throw the whole thing out, is allowing them to press further charges, and hasn't ruled on Fati Willis yet speaks volumes about this judge.