Learn to spot narrative change
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Was the TikTok bill not scheduled for this time or was it able to release anytime they wanted?
The bill was sponsored by Mike Gallagher. An R who notably voted against the impeachment of Mayorkas and against investigating the 2020 election and voted for reauthorizing FISA. Why? Because he's intel community or was recently threatened.
Agreed, but I still hope they ban tiktok. I've never hated a social platform as much as tiktok.
It isn't a ban tiktok bill. It is a bill to give the President authority to regulate websites that people post on, like GAW. See screenshot of bill here:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/03/12/hr7521-the-tiktok-ban-law-as-written-is-not-about-banning-tiktok-its-about-information-control-pdf-included/
Agreed. Thank you for the correction.
Even I fell into the trap of using the popular name of the bill here which is not a correct categorization of what it does. I am fully against this bill at this point.
Well that's blatantly unConstitutional.
"Well that's blatantly unConstitutional".
Perhaps that's why the DC Regime supports it.
To them, the Constitution is just words.
They are criminals. Criminals don't care about words unless those words are useful.
Example?
Gun Free Zone signs.
As much as I despise Tiktok I think banning platforms is not very American.
Youtube shorts is effectively the same app and that gets not nearly as much hate.
Banning anti American things isn't anti- American. Social media is just full scale data collection for the government. Let alone influence operations against the public.
Banning poison isn't anti American.
It's about getting back to protecting American values.
It's like saying Banning abortion is anti American
Do you believe in free speech?
Free speech is very different than poison or abortion.
Is tiktok a censorship free platform? Is tiktok a pre-req to free speech? Does tiktok promote certain topics over others?
Whether tiktok is around or not has no effect on your right to free speech. It is not a pre-req to free speech.
If you would like to ban all groups and applications that engage in any kind of moderation or content control that has serious far reaching implications.
I don't care about Tiktok. I care about other platforms like Win, Yandex, Rumble, Truth Social, private forums, 8chan, etc
Wanting the DC Regime to ban a Social Media site: a site that' poses a threat to the Regimes monopoly on censorship, psyops and spying?
Remember when PDJT/Q+ warned, "be wary of what you wish for"?
The only thing about Hur is he did not recommend prosecution of Biden but he did recommend prosecution of Trump. Not thinking he is a good guy.
Source ie what did he say EXACTLY that created this impression?
Why I'm asking:
As a former federal prosecutor he wouldn't be in the position to "recommend prosecution" of ANYONE, much less a former President who is currently the Republican nominee to be President again.
And his testimony gave the impression that he's not only an educated lawyer but he also has an old school prosecutors apolitical and careful mindset.