I am simply discussing and encouraging research on a blatantly confirmed Q topic, the evidence is up to you and me to find, discus, and decide.
I happen to remember your stance on this subject, as you’ve latched into the topic before in other threads.
You believe that with current technology there is NO confirmed way to manipulate the weather through wide scale world wide chemtrailing/spraying, that the nanotech can’t be sprayed and then further manipulated with 5G or by any other means. Correct me if I’m wrong?
I happen to believe the opposite to be true.
Because Flynn made this post I’ve highlighted, that makes it 100% Q Discussable alone. Not delving into many other ways you can connect Q and weather warfare/geo engineering.
So the question remains FLYNN is a HOT topic in the Q Posts.
Is he good? Bad?
Why would he post “FAIR WARNING BE AWARE OF YOUR SURROUNDINGS” and link to a video about NANOTECH titled “this will change everything you know about USA” where a few seconds in they are showing image of commercial jetliner contrail with the narrator claiming
“Anything the NANOTECH is in can be manipulated by 5G… THE NANOTECH IS IN EVERYTHING… THEY SPRAY IT IN THE SKIES…”
Is he endorsing this theory? Is he endorsing the “anon” style account which posted said video? Fair warning for what? 5G controlled Manchurian false flags? Be aware of our surroundings how? Looking out for these terror puppets? Looking up at the sky?
Discuss your answers below on this 100% Q Verified Topic! (If you don’t mind the risk of a ban ;) )
I am talking about it not happening as a fact. It is not a matter of if. No chemtrails. What nanotech? What 5G interaction? All arm-waving. I have patented a concept for tiny microchips to be held aloft as chaff, with active elements on board, so I know what is possible---but nobody is doing it, yet. (Too big to be "nanotechnology.")
Have we come to the point where we disregard science and the logical method of analysis, for the sake of hero-worship?
The Q statements are so cryptic, they have become Rorschach blots. The Q following read their own conspiracies into them. "Implication"? Implied by Q or by his reader? I don't see a lick of scientific feasibility in the notion, and I don't back down from questioning "Q" (if it is indeed Q and not someone over-presenting an ambiguous statement).
Please don't lecture me about possibilities. I mentioned that I designed and patented microchips that could be full-fledged radios, small enough to be aerosols. They haven't happened yet. There is no jump between these particles and what you are talking about.
GAW > Q > FLYNN > CHEMTRAIL > NANOTECH > 5G MANIPULATION
Evidence?
This is a Q Research Discussion Board
I am simply discussing and encouraging research on a blatantly confirmed Q topic, the evidence is up to you and me to find, discus, and decide.
I happen to remember your stance on this subject, as you’ve latched into the topic before in other threads.
You believe that with current technology there is NO confirmed way to manipulate the weather through wide scale world wide chemtrailing/spraying, that the nanotech can’t be sprayed and then further manipulated with 5G or by any other means. Correct me if I’m wrong?
I happen to believe the opposite to be true.
Because Flynn made this post I’ve highlighted, that makes it 100% Q Discussable alone. Not delving into many other ways you can connect Q and weather warfare/geo engineering.
So the question remains FLYNN is a HOT topic in the Q Posts.
Is he good? Bad?
Why would he post “FAIR WARNING BE AWARE OF YOUR SURROUNDINGS” and link to a video about NANOTECH titled “this will change everything you know about USA” where a few seconds in they are showing image of commercial jetliner contrail with the narrator claiming
“Anything the NANOTECH is in can be manipulated by 5G… THE NANOTECH IS IN EVERYTHING… THEY SPRAY IT IN THE SKIES…”
Is he endorsing this theory? Is he endorsing the “anon” style account which posted said video? Fair warning for what? 5G controlled Manchurian false flags? Be aware of our surroundings how? Looking out for these terror puppets? Looking up at the sky?
Discuss your answers below on this 100% Q Verified Topic! (If you don’t mind the risk of a ban ;) )
I am talking about it not happening as a fact. It is not a matter of if. No chemtrails. What nanotech? What 5G interaction? All arm-waving. I have patented a concept for tiny microchips to be held aloft as chaff, with active elements on board, so I know what is possible---but nobody is doing it, yet. (Too big to be "nanotechnology.")
Have we come to the point where we disregard science and the logical method of analysis, for the sake of hero-worship?
Well this is a Q board let’s not forget Q heavily Implies the use of cell phone frequency to control a pre disposed persons w psych and meds.
Flynn seems to support the idea of Nano tech and 5G manipulation.
I’ve heard of glitter sized dust that can be used as micro GPS tracking devices by the military for years going back into early 2000s.
The Q statements are so cryptic, they have become Rorschach blots. The Q following read their own conspiracies into them. "Implication"? Implied by Q or by his reader? I don't see a lick of scientific feasibility in the notion, and I don't back down from questioning "Q" (if it is indeed Q and not someone over-presenting an ambiguous statement).
Please don't lecture me about possibilities. I mentioned that I designed and patented microchips that could be full-fledged radios, small enough to be aerosols. They haven't happened yet. There is no jump between these particles and what you are talking about.