The good old days when royals didn't have photoshop
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
This photo was taken just three month's after "BOLSHEKVIC's" shot and killed Uncle Louis , raped and beat to death Auntie Helga , and sucked every last drop of Adrenochrome from Ollie and Sven's terrified skulls - before offering up their corpses in a Satanic Baal sacrifice. This took place at their home in East Prussia. Those pesky Kahzar's can get a little unruly sometimes.
Have you watched the Europa docu-series? It would seem so...😉👍
u/#q100
u/#q298
u/#q620
Source:
https://www.docdroid.net/nT0Shkt/version-2-majestic-messages-of-disclosure-pdf
Q: Has the Vatican been involved in human trafficking? What about the Royal family of England?
A: Yes
"Divided we stand, united we fall" is a projection of propaganda that eludes to the idea that the criminal cabal of European royalty bloodlines from the middle ages have spent the past two thousand years criminally involved in sex trafficking of children - that quote states this group, who paid for the music to be produced and allowed them to rise to fame, believe that [they] must project their objection like a spell. It's magick. "Divided we stand" is a factual statement from [their] perspective. This means YOU DIVIDED means THEY STAND. "United we fall" means YOU UNITED means THEY FALL. UNITE!
I've read that that salute was used by Americans and wasn't actually just a Nazi thing.
In their case it was; most of the British establishment supported Hitler, Edward paid him a visit and all their royal European cousins were Nazis. Prince Philip's sisters married high ranking nazis.
You have been indoctrinated about the "Nazis."
Who called them Nazi? Not the Germans.
That should be a hint, regarding the use of the word as a slander.
The Japanese didn't call themselves "gooks," either.
The Americans and British supported the Germans, and the German royalty are from the Anglo-Saxon heritage. The Angles and Saxons were Germanic people. The British royal family is of Germanic ancestry. So of course, they would interact with and support their bretheren.
If Hitler met with the English royals, it was likely to try and get them to talk some sense into that maniac Churchill, who was hell-bent on war.
Agreed. Churchill was a warmonger, should have been tried for war crimes.
I think that part of the purpose of labeling slander terms to people and people groups is using terms that those people do not use to refer to themselves. Whether Nazi or any other term, they were indoctrinated psychotic falsely religious peons used by their satanic leader for their religious end.
Not just to slander, but to dehumanize, to make it easier for normies to hate them.
Normies won't do any research, so they operate by muh-feelz, which is dictated by emotions of love or hate, which can be manipulated by either hero worship or dehumanization. Facts are not relevant to anyone who refuses to look at facts.
You talking about the Germans during the Hitler years, and Hitler himself?
He was a Christian, not a satanic leader. He built hundreds (at least) of churches in the Ukraine when he occupied it, and tore down the satanic synagogues -- the exact opposite of what the Soviets had done to the Christians of Ukraine.
The German people were also Christian, and not at all psychotic. They had just been destroyed by the jews during WW1 and the Weimar Republic aftermath.
Naturally, they did not like the jews, but they did not actually do anything to them until after a Polish jew murdered a German diplomat in Paris AND the jews all around the world decalred war on Germany and boycotted all German goods (1933). That is when Kristallnacht ("Night of Crystal," or "the broken glass") happened, but Goebbels put a stop to it. It only lasted one night.
Other than that, the German people didn't do anything to the jews. Hitler rounded up the communist jews and the subversive jews and put them into prison camps, which were turned into labor camps for the war effort.
Almost everyone in the West has been indoctrinated about that time and place in history with false propaganda.
Goebbels himself said that government can tell a big lie, and if they constantly repeat it, the people will believe it.
See: Covid pandemic progaganda, 9/11 propaganda, 2020 fair election propaganda, etc.
Funny thing is, the false historians want us to believe that Goebbels was bragging about what he and the German government could do to the German people.
But that is yet more false propaganda.
He gave a speech and wrote a paper called, "Churchill's Lie Factory," where he said these things about what the British had done for many years. He was responding to the lies the Brits were spinning about the atrocities in Poland that had been committed by the Soviets, but were being falsely blamed on the Germans.
Your knowlege seems to be lacking in this area of history.
But that is true of most people, including me, until I researched it.
You want to know what it was like being a German citizen and living in Germany during the Hitler years? Listen to someone who lived it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iEP3VtQ9ZTbR/
Nope.
He was not Christian. Most reputable Christian Colleges and Seminaries (one of which I’ve attended) have extensive libraries and resources on the religious beliefs of maniacal murders in history. Adolf Hitler and his persecution of the Protestant and reformed Church not withstanding .
He ordered more than one Protestant church to purge their Jewish members and institute his personal hatred and policies which isolated and persecuted Jewish Christians/members of the church. They refused to indoctrinate and incorporate the Nazi propaganda policies onto their congregations.
https://www.christianitytoday.com/history/people/pastorsandpreachers/martin-niemoller-confessing-pastor-repentant-nationalist.html
Your research is non-existent and has zero bearing on reality and truth. Additionally, damn you for your beliefs, you Nazi sympathizer and embracing scumbag. I mean it 💯
Yes, he was.
The VAST MAJORITY of Christian colleges and seminaries teach a FALSE reading of the Bible.
You will notice that most pastors do not TALK ABOUT the Bible. They will merely quote a fragment of a verse or a few verses and then tell a personal story that THEY THINK conveys the meaning. They ALL do this technique because that is what they are taught to do in their schools.
But they NEVER get into explaining entire passages about what the Bible actually means or keep it all in the context of the totality.
The same is true of doctors who graduate medical school and don't understand the totality of the human body, nutrition, and how it is all affected by the various inputs we all experience.
Yes, he did that BECAUSE he understood that it was the jews who were primarily responsible for destroying our understanding of the Bible. Hitler knew that the jews were subversive towards Christianity, Christians, and therefore the German people.
The jews ARE the anti-Christ. They are against everything that is Christ.
They deny the New Testament and Christ. They hate Christ and Christianity, and this is demonstrated in their Talmud, which is their most sacred religious text.
In 1543, Martin Luther (the man who revolutionized Christianity by showing the false doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church) published a book called "On the Jews and Their Lies." The opening statement is this:
Read it here:
https://archive.org/stream/MartinLuther14831546OnTheJewsAndTheirLies/Martin-Luther-%281483-1546%29On-the-Jews-and-Their-Lies_djvu.txt
Hitler understood this. Most Christians today do not.
There is no such thing as a "Jewish Christian." Those are crypto jews (i.e. fake Christians). And btw, there is also no such thing as "Judeo-Christian values." Judaism is antithetical to Christianity.
Their values are the OPPOSITE.
The jews were the ones responsible for the depravity in 1920's Germany: the pornography, the promotion of homosexuality, pedophilia (yes, pedophilia -- see below why they promote it), the first transgender institute was founded by a jew in Germany, the high usury rates, the degenerate art, and so much more.
Does that sound Christian? No.
Hitler put a STOP to ALL of that. Do his actions sound Christian? Of course.
From Hitler's "Mein Kampf," in his own words:
This was written LONG before he came to power. This was the PURPOSE of his attempting to come to power in the first place.
This is a CHRISTIAN BELIEF, and an acknowlegement that the JEWS were destructive to Christian society.
The Talmud:
https://theserapeum.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Talmud-For-Map-640x828.png
https://theserapeum.com/the-babylonian-talmud-the-jews-most-unholy-book/
A few quotes from the Talmud:
This is what JUDAISM TEACHES.
This is what Hitler knew. This is what he was fighing against.
Communism, which was his #1 enemy, was just another jewish invention that he wanted to end.
Yet, he did not harm the jews who were not communists or subversive. He did put those individuals into prison camps, and let it be known they were not welcome in Germany so they would leave on their own.
But now ... your next comment is completely uncalled for ...
LOL. You picked the wrong guy to make that claim against.
I could probably run circles around you when it comes to research on this topic.
You have no idea what my research is, and have no standing to make such a disgusting and emotional claim against me.
My research is probably light years beyond yours. You certainly have no ability to claim what my research is or is not.
That is just a blanket statement by someone who has no ability to debate a subject with any substance. It is an ad hominem and a cowardly move on your part.
Guess what?
FUCK YOU.
Your refusal to look at BOTH sides of an issue is a problem that you have to live with.
When you look into a mirror, the person staring back at you is a coward who refuses to even look at what the other side has to say.
I don't have that problem. I have looked at BOTH sides. I KNOW what your side says, because that is the indoctrination that I grew up on, too. We all have.
But then ... I became a MAN ... and decided to research it for myself.
I looked at BOTH sides, and concluded the obvious: That your side has NOTHING to support it other than emotional outbursts, and weak, pussy statements like "Nazi sympathizer."
Why don't you say, "Racist! Woman hater! Baby killer! Monster! Biden lover! Charles Manson fan!" They all mean exactly the same thing: That YOU are too cowardly to RESEARCH BOTH SIDES of the topic.
Because, intellectually, you are a pussy.
I pitty you.
You are out of your mind. Psychotic.
Nazi.
its a roman thing, always was. many countries, peoples, militaries used it and yes people did it in america before the war. iirc there was some various sports teams called the "whatevertown swastikas"
Here you go ...
American students salute the American flag:
https://imgs.search.brave.com/Gy5yRL8ng-_21VvjmPXLBYF9gUFNIUB04VZxMyVZdy8/rs:fit:860:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly91cGxv/YWQud2lraW1lZGlh/Lm9yZy93aWtpcGVk/aWEvY29tbW9ucy83/LzczL1N0dWRlbnRz/X3BsZWRnaW5nX2Fs/bGVnaWFuY2VfdG9f/dGhlX0FtZXJpY2Fu/X2ZsYWdfd2l0aF90/aGVfQmVsbGFteV9z/YWx1dGUuanBn
It was/is a White European salute of honor.
It actually goes back (at least) to the Roman Empire.
When Democrat and Leftist coworkers wave at me from afar, I like to give them a straight one-armed-raised wave.
For any who didn't know, the central figure in the photo is Queen Elizabeth II.
Whose husband was a protege of Louis Mountbatten, notorious sex addict and pedo. Saw a photo of L M with an erection while young Charles sat on his knee. Perverts, the lot of them.
Gross
They are Germans after all.