Unity is the only hope we have against the Cabal. Division makes us weak and easy prey for those who would subjugate us.
How has the Cabal divided us so effectively?
Emotions are the Cabal's most powerful weapon. In particular, the Cabal uses good people's COMPASSION against them, along with fear, disgust, tribalism, and other emotions and tendencies. The Cabal's use of emotional manipulation is always malicious and is aimed at creating the opposite of the stated goals -- and the end results are always negative rather than positive.
Because the Cabal's use of these emotions is dishonest, censorship must be deployed as widely as possible to prevent open discussion and clear thought on the issues being brought to bear.
Censorship is Team Evil's self-applied mark of guilt, because the GOOD guys are never the ones trying to prevent open discussion on important topics.
The same dynamic is used in all the most successful destructive social and political movements. For example:
- Feminism
- Marxism
- Anti-racism
- Environmental concerns
- etc
The playbook includes the following (not always in the same order): Highlight an obvious and harmful problem, talk about it compassionately (the problem needs to be fixed for the good of the people, or perhaps "for the children"), offer a seemingly (and sometimes actually) compassionate solution, then gradually misapply it, corrupt the language used to talk about it, censor opposing views, frighten people about the (real or alleged) problem, show disgust with those being accused of causing or allowing the problem to happen, insist on FORCING the allegedly compassionate solution on everyone, and keep at it until you've not only made the original problem worse but wrecked the entire society.
There are other elements involved, but understanding this particular dynamic is important because an Awakening on the issue would largely immunize society against one of the Cabal's most powerful tools.
One of the more important additional elements in this dynamic is maliciously ignoring an important distinction: that Statistical truth is not the same as Individual truth.
Team Evil uses (misuses) that fact, along with YOUR compassion and other emotions, as a crowbar to destroy societies.
Statistical Truth: Men are taller than women.
Individual Truth: Any given man or woman is a particular height, not necessarily the group average. SOME men are shorter than most women, and SOME women are taller than most men.
Statistical Truth: Women are more likely to be homemakers than men are. This follows from the biological fact that only women bear children, only women are physically capable of breast-feeding infants, and women are unsurprisingly (but statistically, not definitely) more oriented to the care of young children and day-to-day maintenance of a home.
Individual Truth: Every person is an individual, and despite the physical differences between the sexes, preferences, aptitudes, and desires are unique to each individual. Men are more likely to be warriors, but Joan of Arc was a woman. Women are more likely to be homemakers, but some men prefer that role.
Biology IS destiny in certain ways, yes -- men don't get pregnant, for instance -- but that isn't the same as saying every man and every woman wants or is suited to their stereotypical gender role. People aren't social insects; we are complex and unique individuals.
That truth -- in particular that some women prefer a business or scientific or other career to homemaking -- was the crowbar used to infer that ALL women should be striving to escape the homemaker role and to enter the business world, or to take on some other traditionally male role rather than homemaker and stay-at-home mother (at least until the children left home as adults).
The statistical truth was used as a weapon to reduce the influence of the nuclear family with a stay-at-home mother/wife and a provider/husband father, which humans (and human children in particular) are genetically well-suited for.
Substituting group statistics for individual realities dehumanizes the people involved, confuses them, and makes it easier to take away individual freedoms; under the guise of "freeing" women, women were propagandized into thinking natural female roles (and thus, to some extent, females themselves) were worthless.
End results have included fewer at-home mothers taking care of young children, children being emotionally harmed in a variety of ways by that result, women being masculinized and men not only being devalued and feminized, but gender-confused men being introduced into women's sports and women's locker rooms.
Note that women DID have reason to want freedom from rigid social pressure to conform to statistical norms (where THAT pressure came from would take another essay entirely); not every woman needs, or wants, or is suited to being a stay-at-home mother, or a mother at all. Individual differences are real and important, and outliers are an important element in society.
In the 1950s, there was pressure for women to conform to the gender norm of homemaker and stay-at-home mom -- not merely an assumption that this was a statistically normal and healthy role for women. Instead, there was a typically negative view of any other choice.
I mentioned compassion earlier: here's where it comes in. You've got a sister, say, who really wants to be an astronaut or Antarctic researcher or CEO or some other all-consuming typically male career; she doesn't have time for children right now or maybe ever. She is NOT interested in being a mother or homemaker. Clearly, if EVERY woman felt that way and acted on it, mankind would have gone extinct long ago. But your sister ISN'T "every woman" -- she's herself and no one else.
Shouldn't she be allowed to follow her own different drummer?
Of course she should. As her brother (or friend, or just any decent human being), how could you not support a movement that openly embraces and seeks to empower her?
Your sister's path won't put an end to mankind, because she's not the norm. Instead, she'll add her own unique talent and perspective to the career realm she decides on, and (statistically, of course) that will benefit society in one or more ways. (Or maybe she'll be destructive, incompetent, and unpleasant -- THOSE qualities aren't gender-dependent either).
Again, it's not just her brother who might feel that FORCING or SHAMING women into roles they don't want is unfair and oppressive; people in general (and even dogs) strongly disapprove of unfairness and oppression.
The challenge for the Cabal, then, is overcoming that natural sense of fairness in the population. The method, as shown above, is to trick people into believing that canceling individual liberty is necessary to in order to make society "more fair", more "equitable", or whatever buzzwords the Cabal has chosen for the moment.
That requires a shift from rational thought (which the Cabal strives to corrupt and mislead) to EMOTION, which the Cabal constantly misapplies. Censorship is necessary for this con to be effective, because honest discussion of the issues will always leak the truth out to public scrutiny, and our natural genetic bias for GENUINE compassion and fairness will quickly show the destructive Narrative for what it is -- and clearly identify the perpetrators as the attacking enemy and would-be tyrants that they are.
END
God said man is the head of the house because we tend more towards logic rather than emotions. Women tend more towards emotions, and often make bad decisions. Together strikes a perfect balance.
At the Pool where I lived in my Fla. days, I told a lady psychologist that single mothers fvck up their kids. She didn't like that one bit, but hey it was true with my mother, and both my sisters.
That's a solid statistical truth, but like most statistical truths there are exceptions because people are individuals, with different strengths, weaknesses, preferences, and so on. SOME single mothers do a great job.
EDIT: Nature / God not only allows for individual differences but requires them for societies and species to function well and to adapt to change, to unusual events, and so on. As I pointed out in the essay, people are not social insects. Where malice is not involved, differences are usually positive tools kept in waiting for difficult times (how many mothers have been forced to raise children by themselves over the eons, and isn't it nice that SOME mothers have had whatever it takes to do a good job despite that difficult circumstance?).
Yeah, I'm definitely, the exception, not the rule. With all I went through as a child, I'm the stereotypical libtard material, only I'm NOT. My eldest sister is Ultra Liberal, I'm very Conservative. The Middle child, she was in the middle politically as well.
I'm a Christian, but feel that Science and Christianity are not polar opposites. God is the greatest Scientist and Mathematician ever.
I can't explain via Science how I could have been in so many accidents, and never injured anyone, with only minor injuries to myself twice. At least 20 accidents, 5-6 on Motorcycles, I totaled 5 cars.
An avid movie fan until 10 years or so ago, but lost interest in going. I did see the Sound of Freedom.
Also was a big news watcher when I was young, until the Tiananmen Massacre, when I saw how MSM was trying to play it into a revolution.
I was a Republican until Papa Bush, then I began seeing how the politicians were playing good cop / bad cop.
etc...
Science is the attempt to learn the TRUTH about the world.
Christianity is -- in my opinion, which differs from almost everyone else's -- an attempt to find and live by the healthy emotional TRUTH of our own humanity.
When honestly approached and properly understood, those two truths are not at odds; they are each a part of the other.
Another topic: your vehicular accident score is exceptional! It's amazing that it all happened with so little human carnage. I rode motorcycles too, daily for about a decade, and only "crashed" once -- at just over 0 miles per hour, pulling away from a stop sign, turning left and slightly uphill, when the back tire hit a bit of sand and swerved violently. I over-corrected and ended up on the pavement, with a snap on my helmet crushed (instead of my forehead) and a new scar on my wrist.
After years of riding like a maniac (felt immortal because teen-age hormones, I guess) and never falling once, that was a serious wake-up call.
I hope your crashing days are over; the world needs agile and well-meaning minds like yours.
My last 2 cars... I'd quit driving in 2007, and promised God. that if he found a way for me to get by without driving I would... In 2012, I bought a brand new Honda Fit, My new Bride was arriving after her Visa was approved and I wanted to make life easier for us. 4 Months later I was rear ended and my brand new car totaled. Trying to skimp by I didn't have Uninsured Motorist Ins. But since it was a hit and run my Insurance paid the car off for me. Claims Adjuster remarked that I was hit really hard!
I then quit driving again until late 2015, my wife was working as a CNA and had to walk down a sketchy road at night. So again, I bought a new car... I was working at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, 2nd biggest Convention Center in the world... I work nightshift and was able to park free in the pay parking lot that costs 12 bucks to park in daytimes and evenings. The free lot was a 20 min. walk away.
I got off work to a barely gray drizzly sky early in the morning, and didn't clean my windshield very good. I hit someone's Drizzly Gray colored clunker. I left to go pick my wife up from her work, then returned to the OCCC and found a Deputy to report the accident and left a note with my contact info. The Deputy asked me why I came back, no one comes back... Kek!
Then after my car was repaired, a few months later, my boss let me pull my car up near the building to vacuum it out via a power outlet. Security has its perks. I went through the tollbooth and cleaned my car, bno problem. BUT when I went to put my car back in the parking lot, I had to go through the other Tollbooth. It was unlit and the barrier arms had no reflectors. I went through and the arms were down...
The Arm scratched my front bumper, dented and scratched my hood, scratched my windshield, put a dent a half inch deep and 6 inches wide in my roof, scratched the back window, Trunk lid, and rear bumper. After the previous accident my Insurance went from 850 for 6 months, to 1250. After this accident I didn't even check to see. I surrendered my tag and sold the car back to the dealership at a 5K loss, as the car had been in two accidents, and they just sent it to the auction.
I always kept my cars very clean, often waxing weekly. I also had a 0% loan on one, and a .9% loan on the other, but between bad vision and A.D.D. I should never have been a driver in the first place... The A.D.D. is self-diagnosed, I was a Fetal Alcohol Syndrome baby, and I smoked a LOT of WEED, self-medicating my childhood trauma away. One or both of these caused my attention span problems.
I don't believe God punished me for buying the last 2 cars, but rather feel a I told you so moment...
Prenatal trauma is actually a VERY big deal, for what should be obvious reasons:
In a growing complex system like a human in utero, where the "complex system" of the human being is starting from (almost) zero, sensitive dependence on (early) conditions can make the difference between having all four major limbs or being shortchanged, as from Thalidomide. It can mean having a serene later life or having a weakened psychological defense system plus an ever-ringing bell of early trauma, echoing through life and setting later traumas ringing as well.
I had my own early traumas (most people do have some level of trauma, from various times in their early lives) and it's made me sympathetic to every person who has to deal with their own. It also makes me particularly appreciate those who do so without causing harm or pain to others. I think you're doing a great job with the challenges you were given and I wish you and your wife well.
"Prenatal trauma is actually a VERY big deal, for what should be obvious reasons:" Yeah, besides both my parents being drunks, my POS father was the violent type. I have a lazy eye from his redneck abortion fist. I was 4 Lbs and 5 Oz and am lucky to have lived. My father's name was Antonio (Tony) amd the baby born after me by 1 year and 4 days died on my birthday 4 days later. Poor thing was 2 Lbs 5 Oz, My Mother named her Toni, the female version of Tony, my Gram told me that my mother named her that so my father would never forget. He forgot, in fact he didn't remember my sister Danielle was the oldest, she was named after his sister.
I'm proud that I broke the chain of alcoholic violence. I didn't drink much booze at all after becoming legal age. The middle child became a violent alcoholic until the last 5 or 6 years of her life. Me I'm afraid to be the monster and boose can be the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide elixir. I was in my 30's before I could tolerate people consuming the liquid drug alcohol is. I had like a phobia. I worked in a Hilton that had a bar as an overnight security and had to deal with that problem. I learned that most people can consume a bit of booze and not become a changeling. Alcoholism has a way of sneaking up on people though.
Interesting post; lots to think about there. Thanks for the "high effort" offering.
Thank you for the kind words. There are half-a-dozen or more changes and additions I'd make to the post -- I write fast but edit slowly and repeatedly -- but this mostly says what I wanted to say.
Very well put. There have always been bachelors and spinsters, and judgmental twits as well... But in a wholesome, complete society, everyone would recognize that every member plays a part. Families would truly cooperate across generations, youth respecting and revering the elder generations, opening up learnings from their wisdom and experience, while they would be active and inspired to remain so. Your post should be common sense, but that's been drummed out of the government indoctrination daycare centers.