"This Is Not A Game"
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
This is exactly why so many clear criminals are still walking free.
Not only that, but in order to deal with them for what they truly want to do, rather than the lesser crime of merely planning to do it, it has to be allowed for them to at least partially execute their plans. Then, red lines come into effect, their plans are defused, and their knowledge of the plan and action upon it are both presented against them for a true verdict.
Without the action, they can claim they changed their mind, or didn’t really think that, or whatever.
Bear in mind, this is a reflection of how we will have to bear our own witness before the throne some day. Is it better to have made that plan, realized the error, and walked away, or continued through on it until being brought before the judge?
Matthew 5:25 “Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him, lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison.
Matthew 3:12 “His winnowing fan [is] in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
Matthew 20:1 “For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard.
The farmer eventually throws out all bad crop after sifting it for the good and bad. The gardener eventually pulls and burns the weeds. The vineyard owner lets loose the laborer who sits or feasts on the vine instead of yielding the crop.
Something to keep in mind, the statute of limitations does not apply to ongoing criminal conspiracies. The clock doesnt even begin ticking until the last crime in the chain has been committed. And we have hundreds of years of ongoing criminal activity. Could 13848 be used to confiscate the assets of the estates of long dead co-conspirators? When all is said and done, I believe even the most obtuse among the population will be familiar with how RICO works.
BOOM.
BOOM.
BOOM.
BOOM.
That’s a great question that I had not considered.
We always assume that asset foreiture applies mainly towards corporations and personal holdings. But can you imagine the English Crown or the Vatican or any other Euro Royalty facing 13848? Of course you would need the cooperation of the countries these entities are based in but with Trump as President I dont really think that will be a problem especially when these illicit holdings are returned to their people. I dont really know how an EO could or would apply to foreigners but their assets held here definitely would come under 13848.
Im laughing when I think of the Crown returning the sovereignty of corporation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN and JANE DOE.