On the tail of my post regarding Gen. Flynn as DJT's VP candidate and designated Next Act in the process of restoring America to her core values and freedoms, someone asked:
Is Vice President fagging a thing?
I had to conclude that yes, yes it is.
In the interests of building our collective rational and critical thinking capacities, and in the interests of tapping into the collective GAW mind to formulate and crystallize the issues around what being DJT's VP candidate actually means, I'm proposing a thought experiment.
To the best of your capacity, what do you consider to be the primary or core requirements that DJT's VP is going to have to fulfill?
What criteria might best be applied in order to realistically and effectively evaluate what the VP must, and must not, be like?
In this process, I suggest we consider what the implications of this or that VP pick might be for the Great Awakening and the making of America to be great again. This includes a sense of where this nation is headed, now and after the next 4 years (on the premise that DJT will be President come January 20, 2025.
What do you think? What would your list of criteria look like? What do you see as the most important qualities or capacities the next VP needs to have?
I encourage all anons to consider this question not only from the perspective of a citizen of America and/or the world, but also from the viewpoint of the White Hats and of DJT himself.
What if you were running the program for restoring America? What things would the White Hats and DJT most be thinking about? Try to put yourself in their shoes.
To get the ball rolling, I've made a list (as follows) of what I see as the several core requirements that should be fulfilled by the next VP (and potential successor to DJT).
CORE Requirements the Next Vice President Candidate Should Fulfill (My List)
A) Fully on board with MAGA
B) Fully on board with the Q operation (i.e. able to understand and be supportive of the objectives and methods of the Q operation, intel war) (aka awareness of and capacity to recognize the Cabal, the deep state and the ancient evil we are confronted with)
C) Ability (i.e. character and capacity) to follow up the next DJT term by leading America into the restoration of its core values and direction after the swamp is drained and destroyed - aka strength of character and personality
D) Trust and reliability with regards to DJT (i.e. trusted fully by DJT) (Includes whether DJT and the White Hats can rely on the VP to take the reins and execute DJT's plan for the next 4 years should DJT become incapacitated)
E) An adequate public profile (aka known by enough of the American people, has a certain level of name recognition)
F) Tested track record in terms of public service (whether in private sector, public sector, military, etc)
Do you think some of these are NOT necessary? Would you add other factors? Have I missed some, or do you agree or disagree with this list?
Asking for a fren......
WWG1WGA
(Kind of feel like a "VP Fagging" flair would be useful over the next few months....) u/catsfive
I think it should be a woman.
Are you aware that a society being ruled by its women is a biblical curse? (Feel free to take it up with God if you don’t like it.)
We have been taught that men and women are the same. If that’s true, there is nothing wrong with the transsexual movement. If it’s false, we should relearn what the differences are and righteously judge the implications of them.
They wouldn’t call us ‘sexist’ so often if they weren’t trying to abuse us away from doing exactly that.
Downvote me but... no offense meant here - we're not all "believers" in the same thing. Men and women are generally different, thank goodness. They are not the same. However I believe a great leader is a great leader regardless of what genitals or chromosome combos or hormone distributions they have. There are some seriously impressive women out there who have it together better than 95% of men I've ever seen. I disagree. I think it's a curse to have society being ruled by nearly all of the past rulers of society. Most have not been good people, period. Give me a woman with a heart of gold and a love for country and the founding principles any day and I will choose her over any of the garbage options that are normally the only choices available.
There are certainly exceptional women, and any man worth his salt has typically had one of those women you mention by his side helping to shape his judgment. In Esther, the King was headed toward having a coup against him had she not exposed Haman for who he was.
You’re free to think what you want, still, do note that the presidency is fundamentally a military position - the chief director of the deployment and management of force and strength and loyalty.
If you were around when spanking was normal, children feared their mother because her spanks would still sting and be annoying, but also because disrespect or unrepentance toward her would be met with punishment from their father, whose punishments would hurt and they didn’t wish to escalate the situation.
Ideally, in America, we shouldn’t be “ruled” by other people at all. We ourselves should be doing the ruling, and the president should be working to identify and spearhead protecting the country from threats.
I suggest a woman purely for the reason to get a wider % of the women vote.. It’s all about winning. And we have Kamala already and it can’t get any worse then the regime we have.
If we take back local control, it won’t matter who the president is nearly as much.
It’s funny how much easier it is to talk people into a female chief general of the army than it is to talk them into taking personal responsibility for filing charges against criminals.
Does the term “testicular fortitude” not exist for a reason? Shouldn’t men have more of it, if so?