It’s just another Q proof. Some of them are amazing. You are correct that it’s not to the second, but, it is the same minute and hour. Perhaps someone else has info on the seconds not matching…I’m just amazed at the hour and minute match predicted years before the event.
Yes, but 1:29 on a watch is pretty general. Why this particular 1:29?
It's not to the second, as someone else pointed out.
It’s just another Q proof. Some of them are amazing. You are correct that it’s not to the second, but, it is the same minute and hour. Perhaps someone else has info on the seconds not matching…I’m just amazed at the hour and minute match predicted years before the event.
But it's a watch. It does not say what is/was supposed to happen at that time. Something else might happen in the future at 1:29pm. What then?
There are some amazing Q proofs…then there are random posts people stretch so far on, even Stretch Armstrong would pull a hammy
Then we get a two for one prophecy! Cool huh?
Not Down to the second, as watch second is 11 seconds r mark (11x3=33) (1+2+9=12 narrow down to 1+2=3)
33 is just representing FreeMason
I doubt you could time that impact to the second.
It's close enough for me.
Correct.
The ship started crashing at exactly 1:29:00
I believe the 1:29 corresponds with a tweet from Scavino the other day that was 1min, 29secs long, besides the watch in the drop.
Ah, so that's the missing piece. Do you know what the tweet said? I am not on twitterX.
Well, I can’t find it with the time match. If I wasn’t so tired I’d remember what the tie to Scavino was. I’ll try again after sleep!
I’m not either but let me see if I can find it on Truth.