It’s just another Q proof. Some of them are amazing. You are correct that it’s not to the second, but, it is the same minute and hour. Perhaps someone else has info on the seconds not matching…I’m just amazed at the hour and minute match predicted years before the event.
I am not following...
The watch says 1:29, and the collision occurs at 1:29? That's the connection?
Okay... but... are there other things that have happened or will happen at 1:29? Why this one?
The Q drop was Dec 2nd 2019. Do you see how most Q drops are all showing future events?
Yes, but 1:29 on a watch is pretty general. Why this particular 1:29?
It's not to the second, as someone else pointed out.
It’s just another Q proof. Some of them are amazing. You are correct that it’s not to the second, but, it is the same minute and hour. Perhaps someone else has info on the seconds not matching…I’m just amazed at the hour and minute match predicted years before the event.
But it's a watch. It does not say what is/was supposed to happen at that time. Something else might happen in the future at 1:29pm. What then?
Not Down to the second, as watch second is 11 seconds r mark (11x3=33) (1+2+9=12 narrow down to 1+2=3)
33 is just representing FreeMason
I doubt you could time that impact to the second.
It's close enough for me.
Correct.
The ship started crashing at exactly 1:29:00
I believe the 1:29 corresponds with a tweet from Scavino the other day that was 1min, 29secs long, besides the watch in the drop.
Ah, so that's the missing piece. Do you know what the tweet said? I am not on twitterX.
This yells me they can read the future events. Nice
Many, many Q drops predict the future, dig into them when you have time.
Q told us in 51 different posts that “future proves past.”
Not “read” the future. “Control” the future. They clarified that they aren’t prophets.
How they do that, your guess is as good as mine, but certainly not beyond the pale.
Still weird, but the cabal did similar things for decades, just their version was more straightforward.