the question is: in what way does their ownership matter? how will they make good on their claim? in what way will it affect our lives, other than being a slide that drains energy away from the actual fight?
I did not state birth ( berth) bit Birth Certificate.
With the signing, apart from the process shenenigans with DTCC, a mother signing that document constitutes an action at law, while she is in no position (emotional duress) to act in full capacity.
This constitutes an abuse of circumstance and makes a declaration of will of erroneous nature. And hence constitutes fraud on the side of the government. And since it is fraud it is void ab initio and of course it constitutes fraud legis: committing fraud under color of law.
Let me clarify, i am not saying your wrong, I am saying that both are used hand in hand to rob us of our freedom and liberty. The SS Account is just as insidious. Neither are allowed by the Constitution, but, we see where that gets us today.
Answer: Corporate body through your Birth Certificate.
Let that sink in.
I tried explaining this to someone the other day...I need to find a PowerPoint presentation so I make sense...
At this point all this little legal gotcha shit is irrelevant. They don’t follow the law we have.
the question is: in what way does their ownership matter? how will they make good on their claim? in what way will it affect our lives, other than being a slide that drains energy away from the actual fight?
Through Social Security, not birth. They coerce parents into subjugating their own children to slavery.
Both. Mother signed BC as the "informant"
I did not state birth ( berth) bit Birth Certificate.
With the signing, apart from the process shenenigans with DTCC, a mother signing that document constitutes an action at law, while she is in no position (emotional duress) to act in full capacity.
This constitutes an abuse of circumstance and makes a declaration of will of erroneous nature. And hence constitutes fraud on the side of the government. And since it is fraud it is void ab initio and of course it constitutes fraud legis: committing fraud under color of law.
And this brings us into 18 USC 241/242.
Let me clarify, i am not saying your wrong, I am saying that both are used hand in hand to rob us of our freedom and liberty. The SS Account is just as insidious. Neither are allowed by the Constitution, but, we see where that gets us today.