The Q proofs were a critical tool for verifying and confirming the veracity of the Q operation and it's connections with Q+ in particular. That was a clear and specific purpose. Also, the proofs were clear, concise and pretty obvious (imo). They served their purpose at that time by providing evidence for anyone asking: "hey, is this really legit?"
But personally, I have to question what purpose this 'proof' serves. Let's turn the soil a bit to see what's going on.
Chongqing was a significant data point during the drops drops 1067, 1120, 2516. I recall there being photos of, and allusion to activities of, specific persons in that city. But this was the Chongqing district (Chongqing City) in China (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chongqing).
We can see some easy correlation between the photo here (on X) and the Q drops 1067 and 1120. That's because it's the same name. But just like in cities and countries all over the world, places in two different nations can share the same name. (Compare "Birmingham" (city) in the UK with "Birmingham Rd" elsewhere).
So is there a real connection here? In both Q1067 and Q 2516, Q specifically references China and the city of Chongqing in China (mainland). Not Taiwan.
The 'proof' here cites a correlation between the X post by "Insider Paper" (aka date April 2, 2024) and post 1067, but the event happened in Taiwan on April 3. It only appears as April 2 because the person using the X account is on the other side of the date line from Taiwan. The earthquake in question happened on April 3.
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Taiwan was struck Wednesday by its most powerful earthquake in a quarter of a century. At least nine people were killed and hundreds injured, buildings and highways damaged and dozens of workers at quarries stranded.
Nine people are dead and more than 1,000 reported injured in Taiwan after the island nation was rocked by the strongest earthquake in a quarter-century Wednesday.
For someone using X in a different location, the date is April 3
So the connection between "Tuesday" and the chongqing rd photo aka Huelin City Earthquake, which happened on Wednesday, is a false positive.
I have to go out, so I cannot post more or dig more on this now. But I encourage all serious Anons to DIG first and not just jump to "ooooh, this is a Q proof" because of what looks like apparent connections.
And, if this is a q proof, what is it proving? That's the important question.
The Q proofs were a critical tool for verifying and confirming the veracity of the Q operation and it's connections with Q+ in particular. That was a clear and specific purpose. Also, the proofs were clear, concise and pretty obvious (imo). They served their purpose at that time by providing evidence for anyone asking: "hey, is this really legit?"
But personally, I have to question what purpose this 'proof' serves. Let's turn the soil a bit to see what's going on.
Chongqing was a significant data point during the drops drops 1067, 1120, 2516. I recall there being photos of, and allusion to activities of, specific persons in that city. But this was the Chongqing district (Chongqing City) in China (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chongqing).
The photo presented in the X tweet here is Chongqing rd, in the district of Hualien City in Taiwan. Note: it is NOT Chongqing Rd in the Zhongzheng district of Taipei, capital of Taiwan.
We can see some easy correlation between the photo here (on X) and the Q drops 1067 and 1120. That's because it's the same name. But just like in cities and countries all over the world, places in two different nations can share the same name. (Compare "Birmingham" (city) in the UK with "Birmingham Rd" elsewhere).
So is there a real connection here? In both Q1067 and Q 2516, Q specifically references China and the city of Chongqing in China (mainland). Not Taiwan.
The 'proof' here cites a correlation between the X post by "Insider Paper" (aka date April 2, 2024) and post 1067, but the event happened in Taiwan on April 3. It only appears as April 2 because the person using the X account is on the other side of the date line from Taiwan. The earthquake in question happened on April 3.
https://apnews.com/article/taiwan-earthquake-explainer-hualien-8c3de7d63c964ae460424aa7e52581a2
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/3/strongest-earthquake-25-years-kills-nine-injures-o/
For someone using X in a different location, the date is April 3
So the connection between "Tuesday" and the chongqing rd photo aka Huelin City Earthquake, which happened on Wednesday, is a false positive.
I have to go out, so I cannot post more or dig more on this now. But I encourage all serious Anons to DIG first and not just jump to "ooooh, this is a Q proof" because of what looks like apparent connections.
And, if this is a q proof, what is it proving? That's the important question.
Critical thinqing.
upvoted
I don't mind being wrong, as long as I am doing critical thinking!
Thanks for all of that!