[they] don't have enough time left in the current Congressional Session to get this done.
Also, "fraud vitiates everything," so IF [they] push this through, it won't stand for very long. Besides, Congress has no authority over the CIC when it comes to military powers, only funding oversight. The current use of Congressional oversight in relation to "rules of engagement" hasn't been challenged at the SC(r)OTUS level, yet, so there's that, as well.
Congress has no authority over the CIC when it comes to military powers
Sad, but increasingly true, for the Constitution...
Copypasta from the link:
When it comes to Congress’s role in initiating military conflict, there’s a growing gap between what’s specified in the Constitution and what we’re seeing in practice.
To a shocking degree, the justification for this pattern has rested on pure bootstrapping. In OLC opinion after OLC opinion, the executive branch has argued that it has the constitutional authority to initiate armed conflict without congressional approval because it has repeatedly done so, and because Congress has acquiesced. As a result, what was initially understood as a narrow Article II authority to “repel sudden attacks” has been recharacterized as a sweeping authority to engage in military operations to defend “important national interests,” as long as those operations fall short of full-fledged “war.”
Why does any of this matter? Recall that a main purpose of giving Congress the power to declare war was to keep us out of wars. We have now been at war for 18 years, the longest in our country’s history.
I think that pesky Constitution limits the limits they can put on presidential power over the military, not to mention the duty to protect and defend the USA.
It's already in play nothing can stop it. Anything they try or attempt too do will be vain.
Anything they do will be considered an insurrection, so their hubris will cause them to be shocked.
Without doubt
[they] don't have enough time left in the current Congressional Session to get this done.
Also, "fraud vitiates everything," so IF [they] push this through, it won't stand for very long. Besides, Congress has no authority over the CIC when it comes to military powers, only funding oversight. The current use of Congressional oversight in relation to "rules of engagement" hasn't been challenged at the SC(r)OTUS level, yet, so there's that, as well.
Sad, but increasingly true, for the Constitution...
Copypasta from the link:
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/congresss-role-military-conflict-growing-gap-between-constitutional
I thought Trump already enacted the Insurrection act?
Veterans of the Trump Admiinistration? Do you mean plants or traitors? Fraud negates everything done.
I think that pesky Constitution limits the limits they can put on presidential power over the military, not to mention the duty to protect and defend the USA.
All you have to say is WHAT ARE THEY SO AFFRAID OF?
At some point whoever has the guns is in charge, regardless of what the rulebook says.
What is this website?
Do they just rip off other sites?