If I were to stand up and say that my truth was that her WEF has tried to genocide the world with released bioweapons and vaxxes, that's just fine with her is it?
Or will she suddenly claim that I am not allowed to state that truth?
This is just another attempt to get us to stop talking about religion and politics in public. We went along with their game plan of not talking about religion and politics in public for too long and look where we are now.
There is no objective "truth". There are facts, such as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. But when it comes to moral questions, Truth depends on your moral perspective. To Christians, any killing of another human is immoral, except for capital punishment for individuals duly convicted of heinous crimes. The Christian foundation is that all human life is sacred. By comparison, Islam prohibits killing, but only killing of other Muslims as forbidden. There is no rule protecting the kuffar (non-Muslims) from physical abuse, rape, torture, or killing. Muslims see non-Muslims as less than human and deserving of derision, ill-treatment, and even death.
But when it comes to moral questions, Truth depends on your moral perspective.
I think the idea that truth depends on your moral perspective is interesting, but I'm not sure I completely agree. Take the universal condemnation of cruelty, for example. Across cultures, people generally agree that cruelty is wrong.
Even societies that are often cruel themselves tend to react strongly when cruelty is directed at them. This suggests that there's a deeper, objective moral standard that goes beyond just personal or cultural opinions.
So, while our moral perspectives might differ, there seems to be a broader, objective truth when it comes to certain moral principles.
Truth is not subjective
Marilyn vos Savant was asked what the most powerful thing in the Universe was. She answered, "Truth"
You can lie about it, deny it, hide it, but no matter what you do, it is always truth. No power can change that.
She explained more but this is from memory.
What an Idiot!!!
and she calls them brilliant...omg.... what a freaking lunatic...
So, instead of getting to the truth, let's just all shine each other on? I think this person is a great representative of what's wrong with wokeism.
If I were to stand up and say that my truth was that her WEF has tried to genocide the world with released bioweapons and vaxxes, that's just fine with her is it?
Or will she suddenly claim that I am not allowed to state that truth?
Need God for humor, which robots can never understand, Muskrat included
She has a rabid hamster in her head for a brain. Truth isn't subjective. How people perceive it is.
This is just another attempt to get us to stop talking about religion and politics in public. We went along with their game plan of not talking about religion and politics in public for too long and look where we are now.
There is no objective "truth". There are facts, such as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. But when it comes to moral questions, Truth depends on your moral perspective. To Christians, any killing of another human is immoral, except for capital punishment for individuals duly convicted of heinous crimes. The Christian foundation is that all human life is sacred. By comparison, Islam prohibits killing, but only killing of other Muslims as forbidden. There is no rule protecting the kuffar (non-Muslims) from physical abuse, rape, torture, or killing. Muslims see non-Muslims as less than human and deserving of derision, ill-treatment, and even death.
Is this Objectively true?
I think the idea that truth depends on your moral perspective is interesting, but I'm not sure I completely agree. Take the universal condemnation of cruelty, for example. Across cultures, people generally agree that cruelty is wrong.
Even societies that are often cruel themselves tend to react strongly when cruelty is directed at them. This suggests that there's a deeper, objective moral standard that goes beyond just personal or cultural opinions.
So, while our moral perspectives might differ, there seems to be a broader, objective truth when it comes to certain moral principles.