Justice Kavanaugh Asks Jack Smith's Prosecutor Why Barack Obama Was Never Charged For Drone Strikes Against Civilians (AUDIO) | ...
The Supreme Court on Thursdayheard oral argumentson Trump’s presidential immunity claim in Jack Smith’s January 6 case in DC after a federal appeals court ruled Trump was not immune from prosecution.
Trump’s lawyers previously argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President.
At issue before the Supreme Court is whether a US President is immune from criminal prosecution for official (not personal) acts.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked DOJ prosecutor Michael Dreeben (former Mueller goon) why Barack Obama was never charged for drone strikes against civilians.
The "personal acts" bit is well-nigh into thoughtcrime territory in my opinion, which would unleash the system on its citizens. So I am concerned about this tactic. But these people are not dummies, so I will wait and hope.
I am enjoying the forcing of a bunch of shitbirds to explain the crimes of 0bama, Biden, etc. on the record. That's super-nutritious and super-delicious. Fuck those fucking fucks for fucking ever.
This implicates Obummer and Holder as coconspirators in a crime.
That is the knife the Trump folks are dancing on, I think.
If you judge me culpable, your Magic Negro will be hanged at Gitmo. If you exonerate me, I will become President, and also your own team will eat you alive.
Trump is the king of the Double Bind. That is what these dumbshits have walked right into.
Exactly, this will now open Pandoras Box that they prefer not to be opened.
Lets see how this plays out now.
Kavanaugh did not ask this
https://youtu.be/DIsDXQIfD_o?si=nWthIkmGyJG9gcPj
American citizens no less
Obummer and Holder became Judge , Jury and Executioners.
There is no excuse for this, en toto.
We could argue for days about the decision regarding the primary target. I might even end up agreeing that that fucker needed to be droned.
But in doing so he droned an innocent boy. Justifying that collateral damage is a much higher (VERY high) bar.
The boy was not targeted.
Neither was his sister who died in a raid ordered by Trump.
This is why I highlighted justifying the collateral damage. The boy was not targeted, but he was killed as collateral damage. So that murder must be justified, and this should be a very high bar to clear. Yet instead, we don't even talk about it/question it. Which guarantees we will get more of it.
God bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
Amen, I join you in this prayer.
Never forget:
The dems want to PACK THE COURT
Let them, then next term we'll do the same. Eventually we'll have 200 SCOTUS.
People in hell want ice water to.
We keep hearing what the justice's are asking , what was the answer to the question from the prosecutor?
From the linked article:
Would have loved to hear it. Would not surprise me if he asked for a recess to change his drawers.
IT is my sense that the Supreme Court is being FED, yes FED, the questions to ask the cretins of this administration...This Question alone is ONE that has the earmarks of being an unanswerable question by the Xiden Admin...and is being fed to the Supremes VERY SUBTLY...JMHO!!!!
(NOT trying to read too much into anything right now BUT this question...it's a real humdinger to ask due to the nature of the question of drone strikes!!!!!)
Excellent point and I agree. Thios actually implicates Obummer and the DOJ as coconspirators committing crimes. Now this is on record.
Always check Gateway Pundit
https://youtu.be/DIsDXQIfD_o?si=nWthIkmGyJG9gcPj
That's not Gateway Pundit shill...
Drone strike were mentioned not the part about civilians which we know happened.
You may not like the ending here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIsDXQIfD_o
Kavanaugh.
Every time he sees something being railroaded, every time he reads a shitty excuse for evidence, every time he hears an argument for why orange man bad, he remembers.
He remembers HOW he was TREATED. And why.
It's indelible in his hippocampus.
The left really screwed themselves given with what they tried to do to him.
They made an enemy for life.
Amen, and who can forget the protestors goibng back to get paid for their services of protesting.
Justice Kavanaugh question does not specifically mention drone strikes"against civilians"
Exactly but they happened.