While that is true that people are suspicious of RINOS running for the Senate, what is the alternative. A Democrat senate will not help DJT with his policies once elected.
Trump is polling 4 to 5 points better than generic republicans right now. Also, Senate candidates are lacking name recognition right now, something that'll improve the closer we get to November.
Polling has become a complicated subject to explain thanks to technology. Gone are the days of "everyone has a landline and an equal chance of being selected" to survey designs that include landline, mobile, and online. This poll included all 3 modes and so probability sampling and margin of error goes out the window. Especially is the case for opt-in online polling, which this survey included. I'm not going to get techy into margin of error estimates vs. credibility intervals (frequentist vs. Bayesian) - but in survey design a researcher can hide biases in the selection of opt-in participants. I find it interesting though, when looking at the published results/ data that the "Mode" of the participant isn't reported on. You can see results by demographics (age, gender, race) but not by survey mode. And for every state, the rate of opt-in/ online participation ranged from 32.4 - 47.9 or upwards of 1/3 of the 1000 participants per state. For me, any poll that doesnt provide full transparency across subjects, and modes is to be taken lightly.
If you download the full results and look at the ('state' XT tabs) you get a cross-ref. Here's a head scratching example, or two:
In AZ, there are 39 respondents who believe the Trump NY Trial is Witch-hunt but are voting for Ruben Gallago (D) for Senate race in a hypothetical scenario.
In GA, 29 people thought the same NY trial was also seen as a witch-hunt but said they would (hypothetically) vote for Biden in a 2024 match-up against Trump.
Sure!
Man, I'd like to meet these people in person.... to put a face to idiocy.
Americans do trust a person, but also a propensity to shoot straight and tell the truth, over party affiliation. Candidates, it's EASY. America and Americans first, reign in the federal swamp, tell us the truth and do what is best for AMERICA. You'll have my vote.
In my State there is a Constitutionalist party. If the individual running is close to America First policy, that person will get my vote. I am not going to vote for a RINO…..
Or the polls are fake because Americans usually got part line and down ballot. Same as the 2020 scam election.
People voted for Trump then voted democrat down ballot? Makes no sense.
It is early in the year.
i wouldnt believe the polls...i would hope the people are smarter than to let the evil Demorats continue their destruction of the country......
While that is true that people are suspicious of RINOS running for the Senate, what is the alternative. A Democrat senate will not help DJT with his policies once elected.
Trump is polling 4 to 5 points better than generic republicans right now. Also, Senate candidates are lacking name recognition right now, something that'll improve the closer we get to November.
You would think that Kari Lake would be up big in Arizona? That tells you name recognition might not be the problem.
And she has name recognition in AZ.
AZ seems to be a strange state, maybe too many republicans are Rino's still under the influence of the NoName machine.
Another false flag. They're trying to move the goal posts, a little at a time, early and often, so you won't notice.
Don't fall for it.
Polling has become a complicated subject to explain thanks to technology. Gone are the days of "everyone has a landline and an equal chance of being selected" to survey designs that include landline, mobile, and online. This poll included all 3 modes and so probability sampling and margin of error goes out the window. Especially is the case for opt-in online polling, which this survey included. I'm not going to get techy into margin of error estimates vs. credibility intervals (frequentist vs. Bayesian) - but in survey design a researcher can hide biases in the selection of opt-in participants. I find it interesting though, when looking at the published results/ data that the "Mode" of the participant isn't reported on. You can see results by demographics (age, gender, race) but not by survey mode. And for every state, the rate of opt-in/ online participation ranged from 32.4 - 47.9 or upwards of 1/3 of the 1000 participants per state. For me, any poll that doesnt provide full transparency across subjects, and modes is to be taken lightly.
If you download the full results and look at the ('state' XT tabs) you get a cross-ref. Here's a head scratching example, or two:
In AZ, there are 39 respondents who believe the Trump NY Trial is Witch-hunt but are voting for Ruben Gallago (D) for Senate race in a hypothetical scenario.
In GA, 29 people thought the same NY trial was also seen as a witch-hunt but said they would (hypothetically) vote for Biden in a 2024 match-up against Trump.
Sure!
Man, I'd like to meet these people in person.... to put a face to idiocy.
Americans do trust a person, but also a propensity to shoot straight and tell the truth, over party affiliation. Candidates, it's EASY. America and Americans first, reign in the federal swamp, tell us the truth and do what is best for AMERICA. You'll have my vote.
Americans must vote all the marxists (Democrats & Rinos) out of office. No way around it.
Unfortunately, that is easier said than done.
In my State there is a Constitutionalist party. If the individual running is close to America First policy, that person will get my vote. I am not going to vote for a RINO…..