Here's there definitions of what should be considered anti-semitic and unlawful:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
It's a matter of actual FACT that the holocaust (6 million, gas chambers, electric floors etc etc) is massively exaggerated. It is a FACT that is has been, and is still, exaggerated. It's FACT.
So now FACTS are (going to be) illegal, despite the 1st Amendment? Absolutely LUDICROUS.
I can only assume this (the myth) is going to be taken apart (although I wouldn't want to put a timescale on it, or a cost)
SILLY SHIT. And we all know, because again it is a fact, that literally Jews DO have financial control of many many entities, and those often comprise, in aggregate, controlling interests in many industries, such as the mainstream media itself. Again, these are factual statements. You cannot outlaw the truth without totally inverting morality itself. Get your comments in before you get J6'ed for it...
Replace jew with person or people and most of those are laws already. The fact that they have to call racism antisemitism should make any free thinking person wonder. Should we come up with laws protecting Irish catholics with a special term for them too? I'm Irish, do I deserve duel citizenship to go back to Ireland? Do we deserve special lobbiests? Is the ADL gonna protect Irish catholics in America? If ivy league schools disproportionately favor those of Irish decent is that okay?
Show me who you can't criticize and I'll tell you who controls you.
Basically, you just described the Nexus definition of antisemitism, which, while still pretty tight, doesn't go to the lengths of wrongthink the IHRA definition does.
Some of this has to be White Hats, right? This is like when you come home to a broken lamp and before you even ask the guilty kid is like “I didn’t knock over the lamp while chasing my brother!”
Here's there definitions of what should be considered anti-semitic and unlawful:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
It's a matter of actual FACT that the holocaust (6 million, gas chambers, electric floors etc etc) is massively exaggerated. It is a FACT that is has been, and is still, exaggerated. It's FACT.
So now FACTS are (going to be) illegal, despite the 1st Amendment? Absolutely LUDICROUS.
I can only assume this (the myth) is going to be taken apart (although I wouldn't want to put a timescale on it, or a cost)
SILLY SHIT. And we all know, because again it is a fact, that literally Jews DO have financial control of many many entities, and those often comprise, in aggregate, controlling interests in many industries, such as the mainstream media itself. Again, these are factual statements. You cannot outlaw the truth without totally inverting morality itself. Get your comments in before you get J6'ed for it...
Everything you wrote is now Wrongthink, straight to jail.
If cookie monster has 3 ovens and can only make 12 cookies every 4 hours how many days will it take the cookie monster to bake 6 million cookies?
Replace jew with person or people and most of those are laws already. The fact that they have to call racism antisemitism should make any free thinking person wonder. Should we come up with laws protecting Irish catholics with a special term for them too? I'm Irish, do I deserve duel citizenship to go back to Ireland? Do we deserve special lobbiests? Is the ADL gonna protect Irish catholics in America? If ivy league schools disproportionately favor those of Irish decent is that okay?
Show me who you can't criticize and I'll tell you who controls you.
Basically, you just described the Nexus definition of antisemitism, which, while still pretty tight, doesn't go to the lengths of wrongthink the IHRA definition does.
Some of this has to be White Hats, right? This is like when you come home to a broken lamp and before you even ask the guilty kid is like “I didn’t knock over the lamp while chasing my brother!”