Fraud on the Court" is where any officer of the court (attorney or judge) makes any misleading statement that is used by the judge in rendering an opinion.
Given that we have yet to have a trial. Are we at this stage yet?
What evidence was tainted? I couldn't follow that article as it was confusing several things including classified cover sheets and placeholder slip sheets.
Evidence from Mar a lago was tampered with and then prosecutors lied to the judge about it. I believe it was Walt Nuatas attorney who brought this to light when he couldnt cross reference what was there with the logs of what should be there.
I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it
Given that we have yet to have a trial. Are we at this stage yet?
What evidence was tainted? I couldn't follow that article as it was confusing several things including classified cover sheets and placeholder slip sheets.
Evidence from Mar a lago was tampered with and then prosecutors lied to the judge about it. I believe it was Walt Nuatas attorney who brought this to light when he couldnt cross reference what was there with the logs of what should be there.
Is Nauta's attorney claiming a "fraud on the court" because it seems we might be going further than the people actually familiar with the facts.
I think what is being described is tampering with evidence.
I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it