Before Q there was Pizzagate, and before Pizzagate took off, there was v/pizzagate3 on Voat.
(archive.searchvoat.co)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I sincerely believe pizzagate was a pre-Q White Hat operation to figure out what would happen to Q type info on the internet. Where would "they" successfully squash the coms and research? Where would the pre-Q annons on various parts of the internet successfully stop "they" from squashing it?
Those two places were the rather well known chans, and the less well known Voat, where team Q sent the newly minted Q-annons after the Great Awakening subreddit got banned.
Before any large scale military operation certain people have to go in first and carry out their missions before anyone is really looking for it. That had to be done in this case as well. Voat is a lot more important than most people realize. It's importance is beyond pizzagate, or being the place team Q sent you after reddit.
You can look it up yourselves, but there was one website the chans raided where it not only didn't work, the original members didn't even realize it happened. That site was Voat. At Voat we figured out how the internet worked, how to make trends happen on mainstream social media. We even figured out how to sway the chans without them realizing it.
Why do you think the chans were chosen as the Q platform? Who were they watching before they chose that?
It's important to remember that the cause for pizzagate research in the first place was wikileaks. If it were not for Assange & Rich providing the DNC emails, pizzagate and spirit cooking research wouldn't have gone mainstream, at least not in 2016 anyway.
So do you think Q/WH were working with Assange or Rich? Personally I don't think so. Wikileaks became compromised a few months afterwards according to Assange.
Now both players and the topics at hand were definitely being utilized and steered by the good guys, but the book is still open on to how it all shakes out in the normie public sphere of info.
FBIAnon was before wikileaks. He came to 4chan with suggestion to research Clintons foundation and the crimes against children.
This shit is so big and has so many people involved that it wouldn't surprise me to find out wikileaks was part of the wh plan. Insiders become key in 5th generation warfare.
The plan was to show everyone the truth. There have been insiders who have wanted to do the Q plan for thousands of years. But they couldn't...until they had someone who could show it to the masses.
Part of the control structure we're fighting is fame. Fame is controlled by the people we're fighting. With fame comes power. That's why they've always had to control fame.
What if someone was offered fame, but declined it? That would be the moment of opportunity good insiders needed to expose the control system.
Because that person, left to their own devices, would be able to achieve fame outside of "their" control. He'd be a loose cannon and "they" couldn't have that. So "they" would do everything "they" could to control that person.
So what if that person was known to military intelligence? How wouldn't they be, military intelligence would know who that person is before that person would.
The WH's would have to contact this person, or else that person would have no chance. If the WH's didn't work with this person, "they" would use all their tricks to control him and he'd still be their pawn even if that guy didn't want to.
So...that guy says "Let them do what they always do to guys like me, but let the whole world see it. Let the whole world understand it." And thus the Q plan was born.
What would you say some of the main Q themes are? Pedophilia, child abuse, mkultra type shit...? All the things that guy would have been subjected to, in order to control him, and now, because of Q, the whole world understands it.
That's why I had to do v/pizzagate3.
Do some research on v/pizzagate3, my username, and Q, and you'll start to understand why any of this happened.
I remember that 4chan invasion. All of us were, “They did what? Man, I thought we were just getting some decent new content”.
I recognize your username. What do you think about things now?
And before all of them there was FBIAnon. 7.02.2016
And then WHAnon
And Megs (MegaAnon). I loved her!
She outed herself as a honey larp tho. Went off the rails on QRV pissed about the fact everyone was baking and not following her anymore. She made some awfully long winded all caps style rant posts reflecting her vitriol towards anons, was not very becoming best my memory serves.
How do you mean she "outed herself as a honey larp"? I disagree, but am willing to look at any support for that statement.
Its all right there in the Mega Anon archived pages. Scroll down a bit to Nov 2017 shortly after Q began posting.
She starts bashing Q and anons daily beginning on Nov 11 2017, crescendoing into more than one melt down over the following days. The entire board called her out the more she complained about anons, bakers, and Q taking away her following. Subsequently she quit posting less than three months later.
She cheered Q at first and then the AF1 pic came out and she freaked out, thinking Q was fake and she knew who they were. But later, that all changed. She always had a sharp edge on her, which was part of her charm. She pushed anons to pay attention and to be of good cheer when lots of people were whining and crying. And she loved President Trump. I followed her from the beginning and read all of her posts and have since re-read them. She was a patriot and still is, I'm sure. She stopped posting when she figured out that Q had been prodding her to figure out the truth and she had her "meltdown" epiphany. Different people read the "meltdown" differently.
I know this much: I have not really worried about Julian Assange for the most part because of Megs. She said he wasn't in the Equadorian embassy in London and she knew that because she "had his passport in her purse" when the operation happened to get him out of there. I think we'll see her again someday.
Yeah I'll have to completely disagree. Her tantrums were real enough, I don't think it's as subjective as you so simplified. I think she's a glowing example of board infiltration.
And as far as the world's concerned (not to mention Stella), Assange is dying in Belmarsh prison akin to what Hell Gonzalo Lira (RIP) was put through.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion. So many things we await the truth on.
In 2009 there was poly
I was a part of Voat Pizzagate. It was the best bc you could check in several times a day and almost every time some new and explosive info had been dug up.
If I remember correctly, the first time we were shut down was bc an anon had linked one of Epstein’s inner circle (woman) to the Vatican.
Before Q there was Drake. Does anyone ever talk about that?