I’ll give you the bottom line. A TREATY needs the signature of the US President plus a 2/3 vote of approval in the Senate.
An AGREEMENT only needs the President’s signature, and America is committed to go along with the document.
What we’ve been told is the WHO Pandemic Treaty is actually labeled an Agreement.
This is dire.
When Biden signs it, American sovereignty is suddenly placed under the WHO.
The WHO can declare a global health emergency whenever they want to, for any reason, and all the rules and restrictions they lay down can be invoked. Here in America.
Doesn't make it legal, no matter how much he agrees.
Well...since Biden's entire presidency is illegal, I don't think our government is at all concerned about what is constitutional and legal or not...the government appears to just do whatever they want, whenever they want...it seems it takes much longer to undo illegal things than it does to implement them...which is unfortunate...
Have we looked into filing lawsuits against them yet?
To be clear, I haven’t done any digging on it in a month myself.
Well...let's take a look at our corrupt judicial system and see how far we can get with that...is Biden still in office, is Hunter still a free man, etc., etc., etc.,
Our illegal government is totally supported in every way by...you got it...our illegal government...when the government proves itself to be corrupt and working against the people what can or will they do?
All’s I know is that Martin Geddes has been making headway in the UK, and they’re worse off than we are. (His cases are all over his substack)
They do have rules in their system that for some reason or another they do appear to be bound to follow. It just has to be done correctly, so they don’t file valid charges against the action itself, and one has to be ready for counterattacks when one does it.
Ephesians 6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
Does “fiery darts” refer to tortious barbs, among other things? Is lawfare new? Were the men accusing the woman to be stoned to death accusing her to avoid being stoned themselves over their mutual guilt? The dead tell no tales.
If you want a book, I’ve found one, but it’s quite large.
Fair enough. It's all they need for a pretext.
And they know it...so that truly is the issue and how they will coerce the world to comply...diligence to the truth only takes you so far, unfortunately...I think at this point we just take personal responsibility for what happens to our families...and hopefully it doesn't come down to internment/no internment or guillotine/no guillotine...we certainly can see what they have planned for us all...
I think Australia is the model for round 2.
A willing police force along with division techniques.
The non-jabbers have to be made to look like crazies while many middle and upper class people line up for their shots in order to continue their daily lives while looking down on the ‘crazies’.
Just one example of the division at play: coerced by gov’t / media complex.
My takeaway from what I saw from Aussie videos etc.
It won’t play well in a lot of places, however it will be effective in others - major-metro.
Surely You dont think bidens is in control of anything.
Well...you tell me who is in charge of the utter destruction of the United States...maybe no one is in charge...even if it's Trump what is going on?