Dostarlimab - 100% Cancer Remission Achieved in ALL Patients in Groundbreaking Study
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
Pot does not cure cancer.
When you get down and gritty, everything is made by God. Something cannot be synthesized or created if he did not deem those rules to be.
Eating 180 grams of organic decarboxylated cannabis over a span of a few months cures cancer. Anyone who still calls medical cannabis pot is probably learning about cannabis from Wikipedia.
Do your research. I've published books on medical cannabis. What research have you done? I've cured cancer patients. Have you?
It's boggles my mind how quick people trust man-made poisons and quickly doubt a flower with over 600 medical compounds that was designed by the greatest healer in the universe, God.
Can you share some sauce for us frens? Which books would suggest for newbies to cannabis healing powers?
Rick Simpson has some great books on this, he needs the money so buy his.
do you mean actually eating the plant or the oil derived from it? either?
It's complicated, you can eat the plant or the oil, as long as it's decarboxylated. You need to eat 2 to 4 grams of decarboxylated flower or .3 to 1 gram of decarboxylated cannabis oil. Eat that much daily for months until the cancer is gone. You also have to eat relatively healthy.
I have never seen that but there is evidence that CBD kills breast cancer cells and does have an effect on a number of other types of cancer. I don't think it is a kill all however.
Do some more research.
Yeah, okay.
Feel free to bring those sources, as well as any arguments to the contrary. If you're only going to bring your own "sources", that's not how it works either.
It boggles my mind that you'd actually think I trust bullshit made by Big Pharma too, but I don't think you understand what the word "cure" means if you think pot cures it.
But again; bring sources. Show your work. Show the arguments against your work.
Be honest, genuine and sincere. Because this post right here does not sound like any of those things. It just sounds like someone who wants to be a consumer of a drug, like people who refuse to acknowledge all of the well established effects on your esophagus from inhaling pot smoke or the impairment that it causes in the user's judgements.
To be clear, I want to see YOUR work. YOUR so called published works. Not some random websites from Google. After all, no one ever lies on the internet for their own personal agendas when it suits them, right?
My dad has used RSO on non malignant skin cancer spots with success, but it's not a cure all.
Right, there is some -- though not a ton -- evidence that compounds existing within cannabis can help treat some types of cancer but that is not what is being asserted.
It is being asserted that it can entirely cure cancer, and without specification of the types of cancer either.
Most of those compounds also won't be beneficial from smoking it either, it is only for very specific use cases.
Is there a worldwide treaty that effectively limits cannabis medicine research and production? Has the US government allowed very little research on phytocannabinoids outside of a "drugs of abuse" context?
Marijuana was misclassified in the U.S. which did prevent studies that could have had very promising conclusions and a lot of countries seemed to do similarly though I won't pretend to be very knowledgeable about every country's laws since that would be silly.
Frankly, one could even argue that it was by design.
I agree pot does not cure cancer. However, if something is synthesized it is not made by God. You may think chemical copies are exact but unless it is harvested from a naturally made source it is not exact, not natural, and not made by God.
Every source at its core is natural. If God did not create the rules for synthesis and the materials to do so, then how did they come to be?
Humanity works within a framework made by God.
If God made everything, if God is everything, then that goes for both the ingredients and the end result as well.
I would gently remind everyone that science and religion is a much more recent separation, as many old scholars and scientists viewed it as learning knowledge left for us to come to understand. It certainly makes no sense to play by leftist ideals that science and everything therein is against religion.
Yes, I agree science and God are on converging paths and not divergent. All I am saying is your either trusting in some dude in a laboratory synthesizing materials in a beaker or your eating vegetation and animals. I rather put my trust in God’s materials and the process by which He makes them. Now, am I guilty of consuming some form of synthetic crap, yes, as this modern world makes it almost impossible not to. Unless one has the ability and wherewithal to live somewhere away from society and be one with nature everyone will. That being said, I try my best.
The modern world has left God out of everything even though He has provided, everything. Meaning, we use paper and digits as money when he provides gold and silver. We take pills designed in a lab and made in a factory instead of watching and using the naturally sourced materials for medicines. We eat, who the fuck knows anymore, instead of growing our own crops and raising our own animals. The crops and animals we buy are full of, who the fuck knows, chemicals and hormones. The list goes on and on into infinity of the things we have replaced God and His ways with. Everything in this modern society is a copy of what God has actually provided naturally. Collectively, where is our faith? In what God has provided, or what man has copied? That what I was driving at. I got. I have no problem with science as it ultimately will lead us back to The Creator. All glory to God.