This is an argument that ended with the BBC being the source of all the crap they believe, and me laughing in their faces.
'Safe and effective'. 'Trumps going to be a dictator' - that level of insanity. It is like we are from two different planets. The BBC really warps their brains. I managed to get the interest of one. He approached later on alone. I was asked to prove it to them - that the BBC is fake news.
With that, I am asking for some help collecting things that will help prove the fact that the BBC specifically is fake, harmful propaganda. This is the right place help.
Anything you think might help, or have saved will be helpful. I have a week or two to prepare what I will send.
He s still voting Bidan, because OMB. TDS. If I can show him the BBC is nothing but Hanoi Hannah, I believe this will give me what I need to further the education.
Maybe I start with media as a whole?
edit. I am in the States.
I have found that people who are so in-the-tank for Leftism in general are basically un-persuadable and not given to critical thinking. Otherwise, they wouldn't be leftists to begin with. Personifying the Dunning-Kruger Effect, they tend to vastly overvalue their own intellect and knowledge base.
As Mark Twain once said,It is easier to fool a man than to convince him that he's been fooled.
I have found that I live much easier if I ignore such people rather than waste my time trying to persuade them to my way of thinking. It's an exercise in futility. It's much like the old saying, "It's like trying to teach a pig to sing — it frustrates you and it annoys the pig."
Dig up the diagram of how 6 companies own most major news outlets, and that would be a good start.
But dont hold your breath. People like this wont wake up, until their bank accounts are frozen and nukes are in the air. Thats why we have the Precipice coming up.
Here's one:
https://rumble.com/v2uhmvy-bbc-live-report-from-911-reporting-on-wtc7-being-destroyed-23-minutes-befor.html
funny that you sent this because I was thinking of it. Thank u for the link
I have put some films into a folder for you, not all of them are about the BBC but I hope you can find some info to show your unbelieving friends
https://drive.filen.io/f/89f43726-c9b8-4e6e-b94a-b38b9dec5862#7xpPVLuw8vLn1VZonWixTo9p1YXBWxya
Just bring attention to the architectural decor of the BBC HQ and to the artist of the statue. Quite self explanatory
Jimmy Savile is one of the biggest scandals in Britain and remains unresolved. The BBC is at the heart of the scandal as Savile worked for them on screen and behind the scenes for 30+ years. Savile is known to be the biggest pedo in modern British history. He did it under cover as an insider with the establishment/govt/BBC/royals all knowing what he was up to. The accusations against him began in the 60s but the authorities turned a blind eye to his crimes until he was dead. The BBC was a safe home and platform for him to be seen as credible and trustworthy by the public and gave him even more celebrity and influence over people. It is posited that he became an intel asset for MI5/GCHQ as he had membership/access to elite circles and was friends with Prince Charles. So apart from the intel/Govt criminals, those who ran the BBC (which is really the media outlet arm of MI5/GCHQ) were his chief enabler and allowed him to attack children and disabled patients (he had extraordinary private access to hospitalized patents through his extensive charity work) for 3+ decades. Video of Saville on TV inc. on BBC with minors, patients, elites, politicians etc
Incidentally Sir Keir Starmer, presumed next PM on July 4th (haha) also let Savile off the hook when he was national Director of Public Prosecutions (UK version of Merrick Garland). Stammer proved his woke credentials then by allowing gender based abortions (islamic tradition doesn't like too many girls born) when some doctors were arrested for it, he let them off. So now he gets to play in govt to further impose his radical beliefs on the British people. Sick world.
And Starmer was complicit in the Rotherham rape gang cover up.
One general media speciality is "lying by omission". So, individual stories could well be true but the full picture is not being shown. For instance, they might research everything good or bad that two people have done in recent times. Then, when presenting the results, they tell you all the bad things that person A did and all the good things that Person B did.
Here are some examples from UKColumn:
Here is an interesting quote
Yes it is. Thankq
Another interesting fact to enlighten your target audience is about other similar Government owned Broadcasting Corporations.
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
The New Zealand Broadcasting Corporation (NZBC)
Even though these Corporations are Government organisations, they are supposed to be independent.
As we know, that is very far from the truth. They are Propaganda arms of left wing Government control.
Even when there is a right wing Government in power, these Corporations tend to still be very left wing. In this situation they will continually attack the right wing Government and other right wing Governments globally (examples are the continuing attacks on Donald J Trump from these above Corporations)
Just a little food for thought!
Keep fighting the good fight, fren.
We'll keep adding stuff as we find it.
All the best and good luck with your mission of enlightenment!