We have an issue with chemtrails as a subject area.
It's a very complex topic and within it are pitfalls where we as anons can be manipulated into believing and arguing positions which can be used against us as a movement. In other words, we think it is a trap that has been laid for us just like all the snake venom over simplifications of the vaxx were a trap. Once we make pronouncements in this area, our credibility can be wrecked.
We set ourselves up for a clean takedown of our reputation as anons by the MSM by generalising on this subject.
Think of it as a more sophisticated version of the flat earth psyop.
For this reason, we usually take the strategic position of not allowing discussion on it.
We tried to make the Tucker / Danica post an exception, but we learned our lesson once again.
That policy does make a lot of sense, too. I’m a flat earth agnostic, but love pushing peoples buttons on it because epistemology is really neat, and a lot of people think they “know” a lot more than they actually know.
For a while, I’d push people on how they know the Earth isn’t flat, thinking it a very inert topic, as it doesn’t affect a single one of us in any single way in our daily lives. It became very apparent very quickly that this is absolutely not the case. People will get as defensive, and sometimes moreso on flat earth than even on abortion. Credibility gets destroyed real quick with it. People get extremely irate with it real quick.
It’s a very interesting thing, considering how irrelevant it pragmatically is, but if it’s something that we should engage with, it’s far, far deeper down the rabbit hole. Gonna be fun if/when we get there, though.
It’s a wise decision to not discuss it right now. I don’t get the chemtrails the same way, as I’ve heard people on all sides of the aisle noticing this one, but I try to be humble enough to admit that maybe I’ve got a blind spot, here.
Prohibiting the intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation and making penalties for violation of such prohibition.
Again, all good stuff, but NONE of it "Chemtrails" - none of it got to do with commercial Jet planes, and not a single mention of the word "chemtrail"
But both the bills got soundly ridiculed in media because everyone is dubbing them "chemtrail bill"
This is the very reason why this specific term is toxic.
Wish I could move to Tennessee or New Hampshire where they have been banned.
It boggles my teeny tiny brain when I see you top frogs around here saying something like this. Exactly what did they ban? Tennessee and New Hampshire don't even administer the airspace above them. That's all federal, managed by the FAA.
These laws, did they define what chemtrails are? How are they enforced and measured? Is there a state chemtrail inspector? Who is it?
Chemtrails is an illegal program designed to kill Americans, supposedly. But AH, OKAY, they're going to politely switch off the illegal spraying because of some random state law?
I swear I wonder what planet I'm on sometimes. What is the poison they are spraying? Are they bring it from separate tanks other than the fuel tanks? Does anyone even understand how airplanes even work? For instance, Airbus makes an A350- 1000 That flies 2000 nautical miles further than the Boeing 787-10 because it doesn't have the fuel capacity the a350 does. Consequently, nobody's really buying the 787-10 and it's bothering Boeing greatly. You would think Boeing would eliminate the chemtrail tanks so they could have extra fuel in fly further, right? Are people seriously telling me that Boeing is just going to sell less airplanes so that they can keep the chemtrail tanks active? Honestly. How does it work?
I've been asking chemtards this question ever since I was a mod here and not once have I gotten it a cogent answer that makes any sense to any rational, intelligent human being, especially when with 10 years of airline experience like it me
Nobody, and I mean nobody in the airline business thanks chemtrails are real. You have to believe that airplanes are just mechanical magical carpets to think that anyone is secretly spraying on you
Will you be prebunking any chemtrail stories today?
We have an issue with chemtrails as a subject area.
It's a very complex topic and within it are pitfalls where we as anons can be manipulated into believing and arguing positions which can be used against us as a movement. In other words, we think it is a trap that has been laid for us just like all the snake venom over simplifications of the vaxx were a trap. Once we make pronouncements in this area, our credibility can be wrecked.
We set ourselves up for a clean takedown of our reputation as anons by the MSM by generalising on this subject.
Think of it as a more sophisticated version of the flat earth psyop.
For this reason, we usually take the strategic position of not allowing discussion on it.
We tried to make the Tucker / Danica post an exception, but we learned our lesson once again.
This is 5G information warfare.
I have issues with chemtrails turning the sky white most days. Wish I could move to Tennessee or New Hampshire where they have been banned.
Fren, we have to be strategic, the area remains a trap for us.
Our policy is for that reason.
There are other sites to talk about chemtrails.
Oh please! So we are being censored about things that have been legislated against?
That policy does make a lot of sense, too. I’m a flat earth agnostic, but love pushing peoples buttons on it because epistemology is really neat, and a lot of people think they “know” a lot more than they actually know.
For a while, I’d push people on how they know the Earth isn’t flat, thinking it a very inert topic, as it doesn’t affect a single one of us in any single way in our daily lives. It became very apparent very quickly that this is absolutely not the case. People will get as defensive, and sometimes moreso on flat earth than even on abortion. Credibility gets destroyed real quick with it. People get extremely irate with it real quick.
It’s a very interesting thing, considering how irrelevant it pragmatically is, but if it’s something that we should engage with, it’s far, far deeper down the rabbit hole. Gonna be fun if/when we get there, though.
It’s a wise decision to not discuss it right now. I don’t get the chemtrails the same way, as I’ve heard people on all sides of the aisle noticing this one, but I try to be humble enough to admit that maybe I’ve got a blind spot, here.
And that was four paragraphs to say, “good call!”
u/#silvia
And this is the Hew Hampshire bill:
Again, all good stuff, but NONE of it "Chemtrails" - none of it got to do with commercial Jet planes, and not a single mention of the word "chemtrail"
But both the bills got soundly ridiculed in media because everyone is dubbing them "chemtrail bill"
This is the very reason why this specific term is toxic.
It boggles my teeny tiny brain when I see you top frogs around here saying something like this. Exactly what did they ban? Tennessee and New Hampshire don't even administer the airspace above them. That's all federal, managed by the FAA.
These laws, did they define what chemtrails are? How are they enforced and measured? Is there a state chemtrail inspector? Who is it?
Chemtrails is an illegal program designed to kill Americans, supposedly. But AH, OKAY, they're going to politely switch off the illegal spraying because of some random state law?
I swear I wonder what planet I'm on sometimes. What is the poison they are spraying? Are they bring it from separate tanks other than the fuel tanks? Does anyone even understand how airplanes even work? For instance, Airbus makes an A350- 1000 That flies 2000 nautical miles further than the Boeing 787-10 because it doesn't have the fuel capacity the a350 does. Consequently, nobody's really buying the 787-10 and it's bothering Boeing greatly. You would think Boeing would eliminate the chemtrail tanks so they could have extra fuel in fly further, right? Are people seriously telling me that Boeing is just going to sell less airplanes so that they can keep the chemtrail tanks active? Honestly. How does it work?
I've been asking chemtards this question ever since I was a mod here and not once have I gotten it a cogent answer that makes any sense to any rational, intelligent human being, especially when with 10 years of airline experience like it me
Nobody, and I mean nobody in the airline business thanks chemtrails are real. You have to believe that airplanes are just mechanical magical carpets to think that anyone is secretly spraying on you
Hate to break it to you but I still see the same contrails I've seen in Tennessee all my life.