Thanks for the explanation. It's sound like AIDs to me.

I agree that the covid jabs were detrimental. I just don't see the depopulation plan working. I don't have any people in my circles that have died, and I know a lot of jabbed people. Maybe it hits in a year or two, but at the moment it was a very poor depop tool.

Yeah, the study confirms ADE (antibody dependent enhancement).

No, the study does not even mention that, much less confirm it. Might be your theory, but this paper does not support it.

What this paper shows is that THE VAXX KILLED PEOPLE.

The difference was that those who took the mystery juice DIED at a significantly higher rate.

The OP article links to the paper here:

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1325243/full

We obtained banked plasma samples from the Ohio State University Intensive Care Unit Registry (BuckICU) collected from individuals admitted to The Ohio State University (OSU) hospitals from May 2020 to November 2022.

They took blood samples from people who were so sick (with something) that they were admitted into the hospital.

Notably, the cohort is enriched for critically ill patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

So, these people were not merely admitted to the hospital, but were CRITICALLY ILL people, when admitted.

These are the people from which the blood samples were taken. Note: The "researchers" never met a single person. They only took blood samples.

This biorepository collects longitudinal biospecimens and associated clinical data from hospitalized patients tested positive for COVID-19 (by RT-PCR) and non-COVID-19 respiratory failure of varying severity.

So, to determine if someone "had Covid-19," they used RT-PCR.

We ALREADY KNOW that PCR is NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL. IT IS NOT CAPABLE OF DIAGNOSING ILLNESS OF ANY KIND.

Therefore, the categories of "Covid+" and "Covid-" are ... IRRELEVANT.

Nevertheless ...

A total of 152 adult (18+ years) patients of both sexes were enrolled including SARS-CoV-2 infected (n=112, 74%) and non-infected (n=40, 26%) patients.

So, they had samples of 152 adults. They CLAIM that 112 were Covid+ (via a FAKE TEST), and that 40 were Covid- (via a FAKE TEST).

Out of the 40 non-COVID patients, a total of 15 (38%) patients were vaccinated (Vax), 25 (62%) were not vaccinated (NVax). Out of 112 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, 23 patients (20%) were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (Vax), while the remaining 89 individuals (80%) were not (NVax).

So ...

(1) Covid- and Vaxxed = 15

(2) Covid- and Not Vaxxed = 25

(3) Covid+ and Vaxxed = 23

(4) Covid+ and Not Vaxxed = 89

These are VERY small numbers, but continuing ...

What we REALLY have is 38 Vaxxed (15+23) and 114 Not Vaxxed (25+89). The Covid+/Covid- is NOT VALID because the test they used to determine that was NOT VALID.

Out of the 23 Vax patients [and Covid+], 26% (6 patients) had received 3 vaccine doses, 30% (7 patients) had received 2 doses (BNT162b2/mRNA-1273), 5% (1 patient) had received 2 doses of an unspecified (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine, and 9% (2 patients) received Ad26.COV2-S vaccine at least two weeks prior to hospital admission. Thirty percent (7 patients) had received incomplete vaccine series before the hospital admission. Thus, most patients in this cohort received mRNA vaccines. Comparative data on demographic/clinical variables are detailed in Supplementary Table 1.

So, of the 23 "Covid+ and Vaxxed," they had various mystery drugs injected (some with 3 shots, some with 2, some with 1, and different types of shots). This introduces a variable that really messes up the results.

What does "incomplete vaccine series" mean? I assume it means they wanted more, but stopped. Maybe because they got too sick and decided not to continue? Paper does not say what that means, or why. Remember, these people ALL were admitted into INTENSIVE CARE for some reason, but the paper IGNORES what those reasons were.

Continuing with the quote from the paper:

Forty-six COVID-19 patients were admitted prior to vaccine introduction, while following the vaccine roll-out 23 Vax and 43 NVax COVID-19 patients were admitted (Figure 1).

Of the 66 patients admitted to the hospital with severe COVID-19 between December 2020 and November 2022 (after vaccines became available), 23 were Vax and 43 were NVax (Figure 1).

OK, so 23 were Covid+ and Vaxxed. 43 were Covid+ and not vaxxed, after December 2020. Another 46 were Covid+ but before the vaxx was available.

Interestingly, mortality among Vax patients in this cohort was 70% compared with 37% in the NVax group, and overall survival rate was ~2 times higher in the NVax patients

Yeah, no shit. BUT ... ALL of these people were admitted to INTENSIVE CARE, so they all had something SERIOUSLY wrong with them, and the paper does NOT mention what those illnesses were.

Because there was only 1 Vax COVID-19 patient in the youngest age group (19-49 years), it precluded comparison of survival rates in this age group.

So ... ONLY ONE person was admitted to intensive care in the first place ... who was UNDER 50 YEARS OLD!

ALL of these people (except 1) was MUCH OLDER than average age. And the 1 younger person ... did NOT die.

NVax patients aged 19-49 and 50-79 years had somewhat similar survival probability, while it was decreased in the oldest (80+ years) age group

Yeah! NO SHIT!

Older people died, as they ALWAYS DO, among the "Not Vaxxed" group.

Note: 50-79 years olds had "somewhat similar survival probability" as the 19-49 year olds.

Well, there was ONLY ONE person under 50, and they did NOT die. That means that NOBODY DIED IF THEY WERE (a) UNDER 80 and (b) NOT VAXXED.

But they sort of hide that FACT with their word salad.

In the older age groups (50+ years, majority of our cohort), increased risk of mortality was noted among Vax vs. NVax patients [Figure 2A (ii)].

... and ...

Further, in our cohort, COVID-19 patients who received complete vaccination series had increased mortality risk compared to those received incomplete series

THIS MEANS THE VAXX KILLED THEM.

these results suggest that among hospitalized patients, prior vaccination may not always be indicative of protection against mortality.

Oh, it means MORE than that.

It means the Vaxx KILLED PEOPLE.

One explanation of our findings might be that of hospitalized patients, Vax patients tend to be less healthy. In support of this, we found that Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score (CCI) was significantly higher in Vax vs. NVax (p=0.0002) patients [Figure 2A (iii)].

Excuse me, but that difference is NOT significant.

Additionally, age differed significantly between Vax (68 years) and NVax (62 years) patients [p=0.01, Figure 2A (iv)].

Again, that is not significant.

Getting the mystery juice vs. NOT getting the mystery juice is what is significant.

even when patients with similar CCI/age were compared, we still observed significantly (p=0.02) improved survival in NVax patients (Figure 2B).

Yep.

Our additional survival analyses demonstrated that the NVax patients admitted post-COVID-19 vaccine introduction had increased risk of mortality compared to those admitted pre-vaccine introduction (Supplementary Figure 2A).

Probably because the NVax label is a false label. Post-vaxx introduction, most of those people probably DID have a vaxx, but they were ALREADY IN INTENSIVE CARE, and the vaxx probably pushed them over the edge. But because they died within 2 weeks, they were classified as NVax, even though they were not. The database is probably deceiving because they falsely classified vaxxed as non-vaxxed, if they died within 2 weeks -- per CDC guidelines.

These "researchers" seem ignorant of that fact.

Vax patients had significantly higher risk of mortality compared to both NVax groups (Supplementary Figures 2B, C).

They were MUCH MORE LIKELY TO DIE IF THEY WERE VAXXED.

However, they say ...

In an attempt to control our observation, we assessed a cohort of 40 patients admitted to the hospital with non-COVID ARF. Mortality rates did not differ significantly between Vax (27%) and NVax (36%) patients (Supplementary Table S1). However, the number of patients in this cohort was also low, thereby limiting our ability to make conclusions.

These were the 40 "Covid-" people.

(1) Covid- and Vaxxed = 15 * 27% = 4.05 = 4

(2) Covid- and Not Vaxxed = 25 * 36% = 9

We don't know what these people died of, so hard to draw conclusions.

If we used 27% death rate for both groups, then the "Covid- and Not Vaxxed" would be 7 deaths. So, 2 deaths over the other group's rate.

Not significant.

Overall, there were 152 patients admitted to ICU for unknown reasons.

Let's eliminate the Covid+/Covid- distinction, as it is irrelevant.

There were a total of 38 Vaxxed, and 114 were not vaxxed.

We don't know if the "Not Vaxxed" never had any vaccine, or if they did but "it didn't count because they did within 2 weeks."

Still ...

37% of the Not Vaxxed died (some of whom may have really been vaxxed).

70% of the Vaxxed died.

We don't know what any of them died of, but it is reasonable to conclude that at least some of them died of the vaxx, or that it was a contributing factor.

We also don't know about remdesivir, etc.

My dad got it then had the virus, hospital made him take anti virals because he had been jabbed. So these practitioners know, they are just not speaking out.