California Sheriff Speaking Out On Democrats Plan. INSANE Corruption. (IF YOU ARE IN CALIFORNIA, YOU NEED TO HEAR THIS) - The Great Awakening

California Sheriff Speaking Out On Democrats Plan. INSANE Corruption. (IF YOU ARE IN CALIFORNIA, YOU NEED TO HEAR THIS) (twitter.com) 🤬 DEMOLIB SCUMBAGS 🤡

posted 137 days ago by brain_dead 137 days ago by brain_dead +152 / -0

37 comments

37 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (37)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– Godknowstheheart 8 points 137 days ago +8 / -0

most people don't understand the bills they write. done on purpose.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– Rardog900 6 points 137 days ago +6 / -0

Same in ohio...yes vote means no..no vote means yes

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– SvixGale 2 points 136 days ago +2 / -0

Bingo. I read an article I believe from Harvard (Business School??) or from some well-known alum of harvard maybe...? IDK, & doesn't matter.

Point is; the article changed my life & business, because it said that there's literally NO reason why contracts have to be written in arcane legalese.

There's no reason why contracts can not be written in plain, conversational English, or really written however you want.

There's no rule / law stating that "lest thine covenant is drafted in the terminology of jurisprudence, it holds no legal weight."

As I recall (and I'll have to dig it up) the article didn't specifically state legislation, but why not......

ETA: FOUND IT!!!! Woot! IT was Harvard Business School: https://hbr.org/2018/01/the-case-for-plain-language-contracts

Right below the harvard article was this hilarious little gem too: "Even Lawyers Don’t Understand Legalese, New Study Shows"

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/even-lawyers-dont-understand-legalese-new-study-shows/

😂😂🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q