It was the Drudge Report that broke the story. Newsweek also had the story but they decided to not release the information. I wonder if this included refusal of President Clinton to start a war with Cuba. At the start of 1998, Clinton and the United States was under pressure from the international community to not start any new wars and put current wars to an end, especially the one in the balkens.
No. Seriously. It’s no surprise by now that these TRIB✡️L types are plants/assets embedded in certain movements (alt-right, conservative, liberal etc) to go with the flow on whatever is intrend. They’ll hop on the band wagon and criticise anything and everything. But when it comes to their pet project in the Middle East they’ll deviate - sharply. That’s how you can tell their true raison d'etre. They are the real gatekeepers and literally the ‘steering’ committee. Can you say ‘HASBARA’? Don’t think they only sit on corporate boards or work in big tech companies they’re right here among us. I’ll start of a little list of seemingly innocuous types and you can figure out the rest.
The surname Lewinsky was first found in Polesie, the largest province of Poland. It is inhabited by Ruthenians, called Polesians, of Ukrainian descent...
No such thing as Ukranian. The Ukranian nationality was initially made up by the Austro-Hungarians as a way of dividing the eastern-western slavs.
Lenin then used this to create a nation state so that he could add more territory to it, primarily from the poles.
As a sidenote: there are quiet a lot of polish deep state actors in our government: Brzezinski, Lewinski, can't remember all their names, but we had a few on the 9/11 cover up commission as well.
It occupied mostly the norther caucaus mountains, southern russia and western russia(modern day eastern ukraine gifted to them by Lenin).
There is a reason the zionists hate the Russians so much. They christinized their empire. And if you know anything about them: that's the ultimate humiliation akin to a christian embracing satan.
" Bernard Lewinsky, an oncologist. He was born on January 10, 1943, in San Salvador, El Salvador " His family emigrated in the 1920's from Germany. He moved to America when he was 14.
Is it, though? Plenty of reason to be skeptical of the current agreement, given how it came about, but of believing in a homeland where God’s faithful reign as kings…?
That’s basically what we consider America to be, isn’t it? How it manifests is fair game for discussion.
Even here, people point out the Masonic presence in the founding, but as if Genesis 50:20 wasn’t a thing, or as if they couldn’t have been infiltrated or flipped or have factions now.
A lot of this stuff just isn’t as simple as we want it to be…
The condition for God to bring them into the land is quite clear and just because that court jew Rothschild and friends wrote the Balfour Declaration doesn't mean the condition has been met
Deuteronomy 28:1-2, "If you fully obey the Lord your God and carefully follow all his commands I give you today, the Lord your God will set you high above all the nations on earth. All these blessings will come on you and accompany you if you obey the Lord your God."
However, if they disobeyed and turned away from God, they would face consequences and lose their land. See Deuteronomy 28:15-68, Leviticus 26:39 etc
Last time I checked they're still afraid of bacon and don't believe their own Messiah, so yeah, this current situation is not the same as what God promised. It's purely a political movement masquerading as a religious one, exactly like Islam. How fitting, as both Islam and Zionism are "daughters of Mystery Babylon" that whore!
The Israelites have been in exile from their land ever since the Babylonian captivity. Only by faith in Christ can they return the right way
Reread my response. I don’t feel like it’s at odds with your second comment, which I agree with more.
The point was more about.. how the implementation of the meaning of the words has come about, and what those things both are in truth.
Plenty of reason to be skeptical of the current agreement, given how it came about
just because that court jew Rothschild and friends wrote the Balfour Declaration
Exactly. I don’t view the Bible as “their story”, but as “our story”, or moreso even, “God’s Story”. Does “Zion” only refer to a specific hill in Jerusalem and the original land of the twelve tribes after they crossed the Jordan, or does it refer to the land of God’s people when He dwells among them in Righteousness?
For your consideration though, as what I believe to be a step toward that, whichever it may be…
However, if they disobeyed and turned away from God, they would face consequences and lose their land.
Last time I checked they're still afraid of bacon
Matthew 5:17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets:I am not come to destroy, but to >>fulfil<<.
Only by faith in Christ can they return the right way
1 Corinthians 3:4For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I [am] of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Romans 4:3For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
“God is unchanging.” True.
“God reveals His character pieces at a time” True.
“God told Israel what they must do to follow Him.” True.
“God told Israel, now stop all that it’s all bad now.” _____
1 Corinthians 1:13Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Christ himself said things different than the church teaches.
2 Peter 3:15-16And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
The churches tend to teach from Paul. There are weightier matters than bacon, for certain, which were very much being neglected in Jesus’ time, but it was also said that till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle of the Law would pass away.
We get offended that the WEF tells us we will eat ze bugs, but shrimp are very literally sea cockroaches, and we know that bug chitin is bad for us, and that getting mercury inside our bodies is bad for us, and we didn’t have any trouble with either of those things because we were told it was fine to eat shrimp because the Law was abolished, and look how much Red Lobster charges for them! They wouldn’t charge us $17.95 for cockroaches!! That’s absurd!
The WEF bugs narratives are disclosure. We were already eating ze bugs!
Believe me, I can keep going, and do pork (which is worse), too, or you can just take God’s Word for it. God’s Word is spiritual. God’s Word is practical. All God’s Word is breathed, relevant, unchanging, and useful for instruction (“applicable”).
Matthew 7:13Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide [is] the gate, and broad [is] the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat
If you want to throw something back at me, I recommend this one:
Matthew 5:19Whosoever thereforeshall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoevershall do and teach [them],the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Still working on the “doing” and “not breaking” parts, and on far greater matters than shrimp.
It’s a long explanation, but this is just a common claim which I merely firmly believe should be corrected. If Jesus was the Law made flesh, and he did away with himself at the cross, … that … would be very odd … one might even call it a house being divided against itself. Why did he bother to teach the Law in the first place, then, if we should proceed to ignore it upon receiving salvation? Should we sun more, that Grace might exist in greater abundance? To what were all the fathers of the faith faithful to, if not the Law and God’s commands to them?
In peace and love, fren, and sorry I’m not better at brevity.
Now you've got me thinking!! I have an immediate question: are you implying Zionism is God's purported plan but was just initialized by the wrong people / at the wrong time / for the wrong motives, or that it's entirely and inherently wrong and a yuuge misunderstanding of the scripture, or that you aren't sure but lean towards one or the other?
My answer: I lean more towards it being a complete misunderstanding and thus misapplication of the scriptures
edit- I'm gonna respond to your comment too I just need some time
Exactly. I’m suspecting after it being the first option, yes.
Meanwhile we have a bunch of people literally arguing against the word … literally “anti-christs”, many being wolves in sheeps clothing - and they’re in every camp.
Woe to them who call good “evil” and evil “good” when righteousness is restored. All it takes is a word,..
I guess I shouldn't be surprised given the fact that even Mother Teresa and the Dalai Lama were trafficking kids....and just about everyone who's a household name is dirty as hell.
But Breitbart....man that really pisses me off. "War" - yeah - on us.
this is why i have trust issues.
always thought Breitbart to be a hero. realized he's just a Mossad asset.
They leaked info to him.
That's not quite the same as being on their payroll to destroy America.
It was probably done thru a cutout,so he didn't even know we're it came from. That's standard procedure for this kind of stuff.
Agreed.
It was the Drudge Report that broke the story. Newsweek also had the story but they decided to not release the information. I wonder if this included refusal of President Clinton to start a war with Cuba. At the start of 1998, Clinton and the United States was under pressure from the international community to not start any new wars and put current wars to an end, especially the one in the balkens.
Breitbart 😱
No. Seriously. It’s no surprise by now that these TRIB✡️L types are plants/assets embedded in certain movements (alt-right, conservative, liberal etc) to go with the flow on whatever is intrend. They’ll hop on the band wagon and criticise anything and everything. But when it comes to their pet project in the Middle East they’ll deviate - sharply. That’s how you can tell their true raison d'etre. They are the real gatekeepers and literally the ‘steering’ committee. Can you say ‘HASBARA’? Don’t think they only sit on corporate boards or work in big tech companies they’re right here among us. I’ll start of a little list of seemingly innocuous types and you can figure out the rest.
Amy Goodman, Dave Rubin, Paul Joseph Watson, …
Trust only in christ and the goal
She is also of Ukrainian decent. Imagine that.
https://www.houseofnames.com/lewinsky-family-crest
No such thing as Ukranian. The Ukranian nationality was initially made up by the Austro-Hungarians as a way of dividing the eastern-western slavs.
Lenin then used this to create a nation state so that he could add more territory to it, primarily from the poles.
As a sidenote: there are quiet a lot of polish deep state actors in our government: Brzezinski, Lewinski, can't remember all their names, but we had a few on the 9/11 cover up commission as well.
Actually there used to be, but they had a different name. Khazarian
Here is a map of Khazaria: http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-images.html
It occupied mostly the norther caucaus mountains, southern russia and western russia(modern day eastern ukraine gifted to them by Lenin).
There is a reason the zionists hate the Russians so much. They christinized their empire. And if you know anything about them: that's the ultimate humiliation akin to a christian embracing satan.
" Bernard Lewinsky, an oncologist. He was born on January 10, 1943, in San Salvador, El Salvador " His family emigrated in the 1920's from Germany. He moved to America when he was 14.
She was probably part of a triplet birth with the Vindmans.
I wish people would stop saying Jewish and start using the term Zionist
I wish people just let a jew who is bad be called a jew.
I think the term "a bad jew" is right on target. I can see it becoming a thing.
They are Babylonians in belief and in practice. Zionism = Babylonian and not Christian or Hebrew doctrine
Is it, though? Plenty of reason to be skeptical of the current agreement, given how it came about, but of believing in a homeland where God’s faithful reign as kings…?
That’s basically what we consider America to be, isn’t it? How it manifests is fair game for discussion.
Even here, people point out the Masonic presence in the founding, but as if Genesis 50:20 wasn’t a thing, or as if they couldn’t have been infiltrated or flipped or have factions now.
A lot of this stuff just isn’t as simple as we want it to be…
(Also, not my downvote)
The condition for God to bring them into the land is quite clear and just because that court jew Rothschild and friends wrote the Balfour Declaration doesn't mean the condition has been met
However, if they disobeyed and turned away from God, they would face consequences and lose their land. See Deuteronomy 28:15-68, Leviticus 26:39 etc
Last time I checked they're still afraid of bacon and don't believe their own Messiah, so yeah, this current situation is not the same as what God promised. It's purely a political movement masquerading as a religious one, exactly like Islam. How fitting, as both Islam and Zionism are "daughters of Mystery Babylon" that whore!
The Israelites have been in exile from their land ever since the Babylonian captivity. Only by faith in Christ can they return the right way
Reread my response. I don’t feel like it’s at odds with your second comment, which I agree with more.
The point was more about.. how the implementation of the meaning of the words has come about, and what those things both are in truth.
Exactly. I don’t view the Bible as “their story”, but as “our story”, or moreso even, “God’s Story”. Does “Zion” only refer to a specific hill in Jerusalem and the original land of the twelve tribes after they crossed the Jordan, or does it refer to the land of God’s people when He dwells among them in Righteousness?
For your consideration though, as what I believe to be a step toward that, whichever it may be…
Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to >>fulfil<<.
1 Corinthians 3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I [am] of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
“God is unchanging.” True. “God reveals His character pieces at a time” True. “God told Israel what they must do to follow Him.” True. “God told Israel, now stop all that it’s all bad now.” _____
1 Corinthians 1:13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Christ himself said things different than the church teaches.
2 Peter 3:15-16 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
The churches tend to teach from Paul. There are weightier matters than bacon, for certain, which were very much being neglected in Jesus’ time, but it was also said that till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle of the Law would pass away.
We get offended that the WEF tells us we will eat ze bugs, but shrimp are very literally sea cockroaches, and we know that bug chitin is bad for us, and that getting mercury inside our bodies is bad for us, and we didn’t have any trouble with either of those things because we were told it was fine to eat shrimp because the Law was abolished, and look how much Red Lobster charges for them! They wouldn’t charge us $17.95 for cockroaches!! That’s absurd!
The WEF bugs narratives are disclosure. We were already eating ze bugs!
Believe me, I can keep going, and do pork (which is worse), too, or you can just take God’s Word for it. God’s Word is spiritual. God’s Word is practical. All God’s Word is breathed, relevant, unchanging, and useful for instruction (“applicable”).
Matthew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide [is] the gate, and broad [is] the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat
If you want to throw something back at me, I recommend this one:
Matthew 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Still working on the “doing” and “not breaking” parts, and on far greater matters than shrimp.
It’s a long explanation, but this is just a common claim which I merely firmly believe should be corrected. If Jesus was the Law made flesh, and he did away with himself at the cross, … that … would be very odd … one might even call it a house being divided against itself. Why did he bother to teach the Law in the first place, then, if we should proceed to ignore it upon receiving salvation? Should we sun more, that Grace might exist in greater abundance? To what were all the fathers of the faith faithful to, if not the Law and God’s commands to them?
In peace and love, fren, and sorry I’m not better at brevity.
Now you've got me thinking!! I have an immediate question: are you implying Zionism is God's purported plan but was just initialized by the wrong people / at the wrong time / for the wrong motives, or that it's entirely and inherently wrong and a yuuge misunderstanding of the scripture, or that you aren't sure but lean towards one or the other?
My answer: I lean more towards it being a complete misunderstanding and thus misapplication of the scriptures
edit- I'm gonna respond to your comment too I just need some time
Exactly. I’m suspecting after it being the first option, yes.
Meanwhile we have a bunch of people literally arguing against the word … literally “anti-christs”, many being wolves in sheeps clothing - and they’re in every camp.
Woe to them who call good “evil” and evil “good” when righteousness is restored. All it takes is a word,..
THIS!!! ☝️
Un-phucking believable!!!!!
I guess I shouldn't be surprised given the fact that even Mother Teresa and the Dalai Lama were trafficking kids....and just about everyone who's a household name is dirty as hell.
But Breitbart....man that really pisses me off. "War" - yeah - on us.
https://files.catbox.moe/ymra2b.webp