Yes. Trump could have given Pence a direct order to not certify the election in order to initiate a congressional investigation concerning the validity of votes, as stated in the US constitution. Therefore, an act of official duty as president.
But I thought, by all the threads here over the last year, that we DID NOT want presidential immunity because this would protect former installed presidents from their “acts” against..everyone. And that Trump would be protected because he has never been guilty. So all this is completely backwards now.
OK, now the real fun begins... it is going to get even more spicy from this point forward. Finally.
Will the unsealing be a reason for a 'Garden Party'? Instead of a 'Gender reveal' it will be 'Treason Reveal' & we're invited.
yes but they kinda kicked the can down the road leaving it open for lower courts to decide what is official and what is not
Yes. Trump could have given Pence a direct order to not certify the election in order to initiate a congressional investigation concerning the validity of votes, as stated in the US constitution. Therefore, an act of official duty as president.
But I thought, by all the threads here over the last year, that we DID NOT want presidential immunity because this would protect former installed presidents from their “acts” against..everyone. And that Trump would be protected because he has never been guilty. So all this is completely backwards now.
This what they mean by 5D Chess.
Nice! Burn!!!!!
FYI, Presidential Immunity ≠ Vice Presidential Immunity (no such thing)
thats what i said,re read my post ,NOT TAKING MONEY
Yep...just reiterating, not saying you're wrong. Thanks for posting.
Hows that line go…. August is traditionally a “hot” month…