Whether factually true or not, this isn't relevant.
The fact that he was potus means that (until proven conclusively on the public stage that he wasn't eligible) it has no bearing on his eligibility in terms of the dems putting him on the ticket and him being accepted by the FEC.
On the larger scale of things, of course its a critical point, but in terms of whether the Dems can get away with putting him on the ticket or not, it has no real bearing.
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
Foebama is constitutionally ineligible to the office of President, because he already served two full terms (laying aside all the other reasons as moot).
This one is not ambiguous or complicated, interesting or tricky.
Obama wasn’t eligible to be Potus last time either.
Whether factually true or not, this isn't relevant.
The fact that he was potus means that (until proven conclusively on the public stage that he wasn't eligible) it has no bearing on his eligibility in terms of the dems putting him on the ticket and him being accepted by the FEC.
On the larger scale of things, of course its a critical point, but in terms of whether the Dems can get away with putting him on the ticket or not, it has no real bearing.
12th Amendment
Foebama is constitutionally ineligible to the office of President, because he already served two full terms (laying aside all the other reasons as moot).
This one is not ambiguous or complicated, interesting or tricky.
He can't be elected to a third term.
Not ambiguous, complicated, or tricky.
Agreeamundo.
I find it fascinating how chaotic the narratives being spit out by the DS are at this time...