https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1810027821487817091
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁
@pepesgrandma
🔥Breaking! The Patriot Front website was renamed from a socialist website. You heard about their links first from me, this is the kill shot.
#PatriotFront
Quote
@jumpmarkets
7h
Replying to @pepesgrandma Patriot Front = Vanguard America = Blood and soil .org.
Socialists.
8:07 AM · Jul 7, 2024 9,651 Views
⭕️UPDATE:::
helper anon off PDW told me:
That's not what it means. It means there are crosslinks between the (known Fed honeypot) websites and patriotfront.us. So, as archive.today crawled bloodandsoil.org, it found links to patriotfronthole and archived those specific pages as well. There was no "rename", nor could there have been, since both were active simultaneously. The only conclusion you can make is they're both Fed honeypots, with a high degree of certainty.
can any webmasters confirm?
if the left knew naziism is a leftist ideology, they might be pretty upset about this.
unfortunately they'll just use this as further evidence that Trump supporters are nazis.
Hm, I wonder what so called "nationalists" and socialists have in common? Nationalist, socialists...where have I heard that before?
Oh ya, that's right, NAZI's.
So here we have nazi (fed bois) parading around like a bunch of dorks, to interfere in our elections to help the marxist/socialist democrat party. These people are so stupid, and predictable.
Yep.
From PDW of all places:
Every single man who signed those documents was White.
The blacks were mostly slaves (counted as 3/5ths for purposes of congressional representation, but without a vote), while some were freemen.
The indians were "other people."
Why would you think the founders created the country for anyone other than their own kind?
Maybe both are focused on race, but in completely opposite ways.
Slavery wasn't even focused on race 😂😂😂
Go pull that shit on someone else!
LMAO
read the New Testament, I'm fucking begging you!!
fren I'm sorry for snapping at you. I got pissed seeing the perspective you came from but you're onto something. Just keep going please. I mean that
Lists!
Someone should tell them on camera that a true patriot has nothing to hide and would show their face to see if they respond lol
Yes... It is.
When you read historical texts of not so great people, that doesn't mean what they say is right or even true, it is their opinion and justification for why they feel a type of way.
What is indisputable about Hitler is the war campaign and treatment of citizens.
Whether you believe the existence of the Holocaust or whether you believe it was inflated or whatever, what we know for a fact is that there are many written journals from the time that families have stumbled on and shared over the years, and it does not paint Hitler's actions in a positive light.
You can say maybe there were reasonable justifications, I'm not here to qualify that.
What I am here to say is that just because Hitler says something does not make it true, just like when a leftist tries to say that communism or socialism hasn't been tried before.
I left you an upvote for the interesting subject matter, and for having the "courage" to read something that they do not want people to read, but I highly disagree with your conclusions and assert that Hitler as a figure was shown not to be some paragon of honesty, and his own writings do not change that.
So let's go down the list here:
Prove it. Where's the real, tangible difference? What makes national socialism so drastically different that they can't be conflated, to the extent you would say the same things a leftist would ("REAL socialism has never been tried before!")
Why would it work better? What are its economic benefits, what are its detriments, and how is it different than the idealistic utopia dreamt up by the rest of the naive socialists?
Cool, but you'll have to do a lot of gaslighting to minimize my opinions when they are compared against Hitler's.
For a man who wasn't provoking war, he certainly had a massive war machine with some seriously cutting edge technologies, engineering and battle tactics that the European theater could not hope to contend with.
Also, he had just about the most fashionable uniform in military history and that on its own was provoking war because everyone else coveted such sharp dresswear.
There is no need to even respond to this, because I already said this qualification is pointless. It doesn't matter for this discussion, because there are enough real journals kept from the era that people have found in the attics or under floorboards or wherever that describe independently of what mainstream media or curated published works try to say.
When 90% of Holocaust information is curated works, it ceases to have a point when it comes to discussion.
It doesn't matter whether I like what he says or doesn't, it is easy to romanticize socialism and the world has seen enough about how "this one kind of socialism is different from all the others!"
I have repeatedly bashed the left in this very forum nearly every time Hitler comes up because they will label you a Nazi for wanting to read or having read books like Mein Kampf.
I absolutely want to read works from historical figures, especially one we are only ever getting one side of.
The hostility is ridiculous.
I did not say the opinions outlined in the above post didn't matter, but now I certainly challenge you to provide proof that national socialism is different, better and more functional without the same inevitable drawbacks it always suffers from.