According to Clif High, who makes predictions based on computer analysis of peaple's scribings on the interweb, Something BIG is goung to happen mid July.
Now here is a great interview of Dick Allgire, a top RV'er:
He gives some fascinating perspectives of today's world. He tells what he thinks of Clif High's predictions too.
Two more Dick Allgire videos about remote viewing the 15 July Event:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQkrbCBO44k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW4Yon8TDds
Here Dick interviews an investment analyst who gives his reasons why he thinks silver will increase in price to $600 (it's $31 right now) - Dick thinks that may be connected with the July 15 Event.
Yeah, sure. However, I've listened to him previously and not found his predictions to be particularly resonant. So I'm just saying that I don't follow him up to see what he predicts and then use that as any sort of guide for stuff.
Because he originally comes at his conclusions from a linguistics angle, that has a natural fascination to me, and there was a period where I tuned in to him, but after a while, the pull wasn't there.
That's not a criticism or evaluation of High, just an expression of where he plugs in on my radar.
My own personal take is that the whole linguisitic analysis angle is a cover. I am pretty sure he gets his info from some intel people. I think the WHs use him to disseminate info - sometimes useful info aimed at us, sometimes intentional disinfo aimed at the cabal puppets - just like they do with other operatives like Juan O Savin etc.
The way I look at these people is not "They will tell me the future" but rather "What is it the WHs are trying to disseminate right now?"
I have lately tended to ignore the prognisticators. Well, maybe not ignore but held in the background until such time it may become useful or proven useless. In my view this is mostly noise. How can you trust any of these guys in a psywar when both sides are putting out misinfo to get ahead of their enemy, guide the narrative and move the sheep in a certain direction?
Instead I have been focusing on the guys who deconstruct what has already happened and shine light on the strategy and tactics used in this war. In that, Joe Lange has been one of the most useful for me. Its my opinion that by doing this we gain understanding of the who, what and whys, making it more fruitful when we use our own logic and discernment to make sense of the events in front of us.
Just the tack I take to make sense of this mixed up, mottled up, shook up world.
Your reply here makes sense but when I think about it, it would have to mean that even this event was either planned, or known about beforehand. I can not possibly imagine any white hat willing to just gaze our precious Donald, twice no less. No one is that good of a shot to be certain not to kill him (especially considering that he is always moving, unpredictably). The only way this makes sense is that the White hats knew the black hats were planning this but Trump has some new technology protecting him which makes high speed metal objects veer off target a little.
Think about it this way. What if the BHs were convinced that their goal should be to would Trump but not kill him ?
Like if they thought that would make Trump resign from the race???? My 1st reply to that is that THEY DON'T KNOW TRUMP. But then, they don't know him, they don't understand having that conviction that he has to right their wrongs. Evil really DOESN'T understand good. So yes, I could see them having that intention, but they could have just as easily killed him, actually more easily. It's harder to intentionally just gaze a moving target than to hit it. They only way they could have just glazed 2 shots in a row would be if those bullets were really AI controlled drones
I think it's more likely that the WH have an electrostatic & magnetic set up where the 1st creates a dipole in the metal object and the 2nd veers it off course