Then, there is also the question of whether Merrick Garland is who the deep state thinks he is, and whether he's doing exactly what the deep state wants him to do.
Optically, he gets bashed, just as DJT bashes Sleepy Joe, but the DOJ under Garland has also been advancing other behind the scenes issues, like tackling trafficking, child and otherwise.
Trump said some curious and interesting things about Garland. "I thought he was a great guy. Maybe his or maybe he isn't. I guess we'll see" (not verbatim, but that's the gist of it).
I get into trouble sometimes for suggesting that certain people might be playing a role for good. BUT this movie is so clever it is hard not to be open to the thought at this stage.
Yah. People too easily forget that this is a psywar. Normies are MEANT to have a certain viewpoint to build public opinion, but anons are meant to be thinking and observing on different level.
First and foremost, we really should NOT simply be taking things at face value, and understand that the whole public sphere is awash with narratives and psyops. Looking at the net effects that a person's actions have is a far more effective way of getting to the core than just looking at what they SEEM like.
But just because people can come to a conclusion about someone playing a role or not doesn't make it true, and so discussion should never be shut down on the premise of whether someone is good/bad/etc.
I'm not really sure where the "but" comes from, because I could not agree with you more. No sincere discussion motivated n good faith needs to be or should be shut down. The only exception would be if it is off-topic.
Two things I will find more interesting than anything else: What happened to allow us to win the 2016 Election, and also, what "DS" actors have actually been White Hats this whole time.
Agreed.
Then, there is also the question of whether Merrick Garland is who the deep state thinks he is, and whether he's doing exactly what the deep state wants him to do.
Optically, he gets bashed, just as DJT bashes Sleepy Joe, but the DOJ under Garland has also been advancing other behind the scenes issues, like tackling trafficking, child and otherwise.
Trump said some curious and interesting things about Garland. "I thought he was a great guy. Maybe his or maybe he isn't. I guess we'll see" (not verbatim, but that's the gist of it).
I get into trouble sometimes for suggesting that certain people might be playing a role for good. BUT this movie is so clever it is hard not to be open to the thought at this stage.
Yah. People too easily forget that this is a psywar. Normies are MEANT to have a certain viewpoint to build public opinion, but anons are meant to be thinking and observing on different level.
First and foremost, we really should NOT simply be taking things at face value, and understand that the whole public sphere is awash with narratives and psyops. Looking at the net effects that a person's actions have is a far more effective way of getting to the core than just looking at what they SEEM like.
But just because people can come to a conclusion about someone playing a role or not doesn't make it true, and so discussion should never be shut down on the premise of whether someone is good/bad/etc.
I'm not really sure where the "but" comes from, because I could not agree with you more. No sincere discussion motivated n good faith needs to be or should be shut down. The only exception would be if it is off-topic.
Two things I will find more interesting than anything else: What happened to allow us to win the 2016 Election, and also, what "DS" actors have actually been White Hats this whole time.
I'm with you. I'm not suggesting he won illegitimately. I'm saying I want the story on how they (us) beat the rigging that year.