ASSASSINATION UPDATE: Trump is FINE campaign reports (RSBN)
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
I'm kinda feeling that way about your post. I find it interesting how our individual knowledge changes what we perceive as "powerfully ignorant."
My investigation suggests that all the world's a stage. Fake, staged events happen more often than anything organic. That includes "assassinations." There are both false flags (real assassinations, but not by who the media reports as the assassin), faked deaths, and failed assassinations, where all three are, to one degree or another, staged events. I haven't actually found a single assassination in history that I can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, "history has correctly placed blame here."
For example, JD Rockefeller was the recipient of an "assassination attempt" twice. In both cases the people who attempted the assassination bungled it and blew themselves up. In both cases the group who were blamed were ultimately on Rockefeller's payroll. That's not recorded in history, but that is what my investigation turned up. In those particular cases the people who were the would be assassins were True Believers to the cause (they didn't know they were patsies), but the organization behind them was Controlled Opposition.
We have been told countless times "you are watching a movie," "enjoy the show," etc. by Q. The post you are replying to correctly addresses very suspicious facts found in numerous fake assassination attempts. I suggest it is you who is not "serious about the world we live in," and ignorant of exactly how much shit is not organic, but contrived. It is literally everywhere.
This isn't rocket science. It only takes a skosh of deductive reasoning skills to at least consider that this may have been a staged event, given what we have seen so far.
It does take familiarity with firearms, which I have. Not from watching movies, but by actually shooting them and finding how difficult it is to hit the target. I will rate my marksmanship more highly than your movie appreciation. My remark about a miss stands and is so far substantiated by reported information.
You criticize me for being ignorant of failed assassination attempts? It doesn't affect my recollection of successful attempts against Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, the Kennedy brothers, and Prince Ferdinand. And unsuccessful attempts against FDR and Reagan.
I've been hunting since I was 13. Not to brag, but just for context, I can hit a (slow) moving turkey at the base of the neck from 100 yards with an open sight.
I wasn't talking about hollywood movies, I was talking about my comprehensive investigation into the past.
Lincoln was quite possibly faked. All of the others have different organizations behind them than history records. Both FDR and Reagan were almost certainly intended to not succeed but were either intended to create a "political victim" (FDR) or intended as a warning (Reagan).
You have to actually dig in to history to see the fuckery. There is so much more on every single one of those events that isn't recorded in the standard version of history, but that you can find in congressional reports, biographies, financial records, etc. that paint a very different picture than the one given to the masses.
Regardless, in none of those cases were any of them hit in a way that will be completely obvious to the whole world, yet actually completely harmless to the "victim." Those "coincidences" are, I suggest, anything but coincidental.
Frens, let's not fight each other. Let's save it for the true foe. Let's not forget who our true enemy is (starts with S) and how he uses our emotions to manipulate us.
I'm not sure why you are responding to me in that way. I'm not really doing that much "fighting," nor are my emotions heated in any way (am I coming across that way)?
From my perspective, I am trying to help people understand how little is organic in the world (at least on the scale of stuff that makes it to the media). There are false flags everywhere, and everything is controlled opposition. People need to see that, really grok that, before people can wake up; before people can accept the real solution to the madness that is the "real world" (which is anything but real).
Strange fakery that ends up with a dead Lincoln. All sorts of backgrounds, but the perpetrators and the events are fact. I don't understand your remark about "completely oblivious" and "completetely harmless." I can't recall any attempts that were oblivious, but some that were failures. Failure does not mean fake. Especially when there are collateral casualties and a death.
I said "completely obvious" not "oblivious." His "face wound", the streak of blood across his face as he stood up to the camera; everyone will see that blood. It was in a perfect place for it to have maximum drama, while at the same time, it won't even affect his shaving tomorrow. It was completely harmless.
As for Lincoln, I am not convinced he died in the assassination attempt. I'm not going to get in to my investigation into that at this time, but there is a ton of shit that suggests that might not have been the case. I can say with reasonable confidence that either Lincoln didn't die that night, or that his son (Robert) was complicit in the assassination (which would also imply him as complicit in the assassinations of Garfield and McKinley).
Some were failures. Spectacular failures. Spectacular failures that turned out to be incredibly helpful to the "victim" (like FDR). In order to really understand these things, you have to understand that organizations like the KKK, or the corporatacracy that supposedly attempted to assassinate FDR were actually his biggest proponents. In order to understand that, you should probably read my report.
Regardless, this shit happens all the time. Where do you think Smollett got the idea from? History is absolutely riddled with such fake failed assassinations that vaulted people to some social victory (political, financial, "social justice," etc.).