I wonder why they got a beta boy who definitely doesn't know how to shoot instead of some professional who wouldn't have missed the shot?
It's pretty clear there was someone on the inside that allowed him to get close and on that roof.
My assumption is that pros would have known that this is an absolute suicide mission and too risky, so they declined.
Only a dumbass libtard would say yes.
Any thoughts?
...they did hire professionals, and by the grace of God they failed...
...the kid that got terminated was just a Patsy....
The fbi probably groomed a kid. He knew he was going to get to take the shots he was supposed to take. He wasn’t told he was going to be the dead brainwashed patsy.
...highly probable....
He was groomed by professionals to do this. He was probably assured that nothing would happen to him, and they would get him out as soon as he pulled the trigger. "Just get back to the ladder, and we'll have a car waiting to get you out!". He probably believed that up until the point a cabal sniper ripped a bullet into his head. Dead men tell no tales.
...highly probable...
It was a kill shot if not for Trump turning his head
100%
He's controllable through his therapist parents.
Yes, that's what I think. They seem to have many sleepers that are being controlled by psych drugs.
They picked Pennsylvania because it's one of (if not the most) corrupt states and they activated the patsy that they had in the area.
Simple as.
this. and the deep state doesn't have the resources it once had. patriots are in control, so whatever they use is what they are allowed to use. down to scraps.
I agree you can't hire a professional for a suicide mission. That's why the rooftop dude is a patsy brainwashed and drugged up. The professional is the "shooter on the grassy knoll" who gets away. I would bet money that there's a whole other story we have yet to hear and just how lucky Trump really was
Two shooters, one patsy. The unalive guy gets the blame.
They do not even know what women is. How are they going to hire a Professional?
I’m not sure I believe anything we’ve been told so far. And, I’ve been thinking about who I would believe. Even the people saying they saw the shooter and alerted the local law enforcement disturb me.
Not one person had the reaction to distract or disrupt the shooter in some way? No one yelled at him, threw things at him, or pursued him up the ladder? They just alerted the cops and then stood by, some of them filming the shooter getting into position. And, in those videos no one is shouting, screaming, or pleading with the cops.
This has been weird to me, but there’s also been scary studies done on this where most people will follow along with something so as not to cause a disturbance. It shows how much we truly are like sheep, even at a Trump rally where people are more awake than most.
His shot was on target. God intervened and moved Trumps head about 1/2" out of the way of direct hit during the split second when the shooter was pulling the trigger. Point being, he had enough skill to do what they sent him to do.
We don’t know that it was his gun that fired the shot that hit Trump, we’re just assuming.
Until we have something more credible to show otherwise, then we simply need to work with what we have.
I think him not having a scope at 150 yds, not being a trained marksman, shows all the signs of being the fall guy, etc are pretty credible. Enough to require us to not be certain in any way that his shot was the one that hit Trump. At minimum it requires us to leave the identity of the gun that shot the bullet in question.
Patsy, almost all assassin's are cat paws. Welcome to MK Ultra programming. Just think about all the assassinations that were successful or not.
100% agree, A "professional" would not have been willing to die for the cause.
Running low on ammo? Getting closer to the end of the movie.
plausible deniability. Its easier to have some mentally ill degenerate do your work for you so there are degrees of separation.
Pros don't like ending their lives for cash