You see it in videos both counter snipers fire on the kid... making a total of at least three total shooters that we know of. Not accounting for any additional sniper coverage off screen.
In the current explanation there is a shooter and 2 snipers so 3 shooters, via audio, makes sense. If sniper 2 didn't shoot, there easily could have been a cop or other SS shooting as well.
There are posts saying there were at least 3 shooters according to audio forensics.
I do not believe there were 3 shooters. I am doubting there were even 2.
B-but da expurrtz!.!
There's obviously return shots that killed the kid on the roof.
So having "3 shooters" does not mean having three shooters firing at Trump.
You see it in videos both counter snipers fire on the kid... making a total of at least three total shooters that we know of. Not accounting for any additional sniper coverage off screen.
I saw what looked like a convincing analysis that the other counter sniper position had coverage over a good area but not that area due to tree line
Good point, that crossed my mind too.
But surely, the forensics experts must have taken that into account too.
I don't know your source
aslan's post, grain of salt, cnn
Holy shit.....seriously??? do you have any links handy where they describe where / how there could have been 3 shooters???
There was obviously a flurry of shots; did all those come from the shooter, at Trump, or were any of the shots USSS counter-snipers?
I've just lost any & all respect I had for USSS. I shouldn't really be surprised they have become corrupt & politicized, but there you have it.....
link
Thank You!!!
You're welcome!
In the current explanation there is a shooter and 2 snipers so 3 shooters, via audio, makes sense. If sniper 2 didn't shoot, there easily could have been a cop or other SS shooting as well.
Here’s my post saying there wasn’t. Hardly qualifies as proof.