I have also seen that the father was a psychologist, the mother a retired teacher and registered democrats…
“”Neighbor on WPXI local Pittsburgh news: 'There absolutely was MAGA
supporting things for a while.'
The neighbor of the Trump rally shooter says until recently there were pro-
Trump signs in the Crooks' front yard””
Maybe a child disgruntled against his parents, and registered R in the closed PA primary to get Nikki in?
This doesn't smell right to me. I don't think that they're telling us the truth about who the shooter was. The guy they showed with the head wound looks more like the guy that the chans pointed out. Not to mention that they haven't said anything about the gun that was used. They're acting different than they have done in the past.
Well, there's a "second" Thomas Crooks, who looks a helluva lot like the kid [they]'ve designed the narrative around, who's saying he and Michael Yearick (supposed accomplice) are both still alive and well, so...
Or that the parents - Trump supporters, evil people - pushed their poor child into a rebellion against them and their worldview to the point where he started to see Trump as the instigator, and in despairing rebellion, angry at his parents, decided to kill the man his parents admired.
Might work as well, and perhaps could be the reason why they are showing those pictures of the shooter back when he was a cute looking kid and teenager.
I have also seen that the father was a psychologist, the mother a retired teacher and registered democrats…
“”Neighbor on WPXI local Pittsburgh news: 'There absolutely was MAGA supporting things for a while.' The neighbor of the Trump rally shooter says until recently there were pro- Trump signs in the Crooks' front yard””
Maybe a child disgruntled against his parents, and registered R in the closed PA primary to get Nikki in?
That’s a very Lefty Twitter site, btw.
This doesn't smell right to me. I don't think that they're telling us the truth about who the shooter was. The guy they showed with the head wound looks more like the guy that the chans pointed out. Not to mention that they haven't said anything about the gun that was used. They're acting different than they have done in the past.
Well, there's a "second" Thomas Crooks, who looks a helluva lot like the kid [they]'ve designed the narrative around, who's saying he and Michael Yearick (supposed accomplice) are both still alive and well, so...
I don't buy it. They're trying to frame the story as a Trump supporter being the shooter to push a narrative.
Or that the parents - Trump supporters, evil people - pushed their poor child into a rebellion against them and their worldview to the point where he started to see Trump as the instigator, and in despairing rebellion, angry at his parents, decided to kill the man his parents admired.
Might work as well, and perhaps could be the reason why they are showing those pictures of the shooter back when he was a cute looking kid and teenager.
They are no way in hell.
They talked to CNN.
Nuff said.
Bogus