Ok, even so, this whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense to me. AI does not need to be in a public cloud, why would they risk that? Only reason I can think is they can't find someone to run some GPUs privately, which seems not correct.
I don't say that the theory above makes sense or not, but Microsoft with Azure is hard into AI. I've been on the Microsoft Business Summit in Frankfurt, Germany in 2019, and me and my co-worker expected to learn about M365, implementation strategies, cloud readyness shit, identity management, and we got that. But there was a huge focus on Microsoft's AI capabilities and the impact of cloud computing -they called it shared intelligence- to the business world.
Funny enough this was a few months before Covid, Microsoft Teams got pushed hard in the last quarter of 2019, and then the whole world got locked down and we as businesses were still able to communicate over distance. Until then Teams was a better Skype, but it improved quickly, and became -next to Zoom- the tool to keep businesses alive. They didn't want to kill the economy, but now they got a grab on a large ammount of data processed in Teams calls and Sharepoint, this data can only be analyzed by AI, aka self learning supercomputers.
Don't think for a second Microsoft hasn't access to this data. They claim it's encryptet, yeah, but the hold the encryption keys. The whole way Microsoft Federation Services works gives them the key to the Kingdom. They -and so we- have literally everything. It works both ways.
What AI applications are hosted on Azure can only be speculated, but it could be a not too far fetched scenario that an AI model acting as the sitting President of the US could run on Microsoft servers. We don't know, what this company is capable of. We were tought to hate Microsoft because of their stupid vulnerabilities, because of their monopoly, because of Bill Gates, but in reality, MS rules the world of business data due to M365.
Their newest coup is an AI called Copilot, something that nests deep into M365 tenants to index all of your data for the greater good of improving your daily business. Yeah, for sure.
Long rant with no clear point taken, but we are dealing with stuff we don't want to understand. It's bad, or WHs took over and use all the data for good. We'll find out.
To the public, I agree. But what are they really capable of? I don't have proof of what's going on in the dark, but MS is such a sinister, fraudulent company, I don't trust them as a whole. My boss calls me paranoid, but I leave him with naggin' doubts when we talk about if MS can be trusted. That's part of what he pays me for. BCM is underestimated to many deciders when it comes to MS. Azure down, poof, game over. We made us dependent to a cabal company.
But, it works both ways...
The "we have it all" is because they have it all. Q is a man in the middle. I think Mike Rogers is part of Q. And then, we really have it all.
I agree with you on all points. I just can't see a reason to use MSFT and Azure to do something special for AI. You can do it all and more on prem...worst case, run the model training on a distributed environment like public cloud, then pull it all in house for utilizing said models.
While it takes a lot of hardware, it's not like it takes Azure-scale datacenters to support DSP and Audio AI. Video and further might take more, but it's not at that scale.
Hillary didn't host her email on some large-scale enterprise exchange infrastructure...it was a server.
I’m in IT and have some cloud exp but only dip my toe into the ai/ml space.
This was my thought as well … nothing special.
Additionally it would be INSANELY stupid for them to host such a thing in the cloud. There is no reason to do so cuz it only adds risk with very little to no gain…. Plus a huge compute bill paper trail tying back to somewhere. Best to keep something like this air gapped or at least on prem somewhere MAYBE with emergency level remote access.
What if the theory is true that the main cloud AIs are digital ouija boards, i.e. demons or nephilim offspring are what is behind the curtain? Difference between computer answers and really intelligent-looking answers?
Ok, even so, this whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense to me. AI does not need to be in a public cloud, why would they risk that? Only reason I can think is they can't find someone to run some GPUs privately, which seems not correct.
I don't say that the theory above makes sense or not, but Microsoft with Azure is hard into AI. I've been on the Microsoft Business Summit in Frankfurt, Germany in 2019, and me and my co-worker expected to learn about M365, implementation strategies, cloud readyness shit, identity management, and we got that. But there was a huge focus on Microsoft's AI capabilities and the impact of cloud computing -they called it shared intelligence- to the business world.
Funny enough this was a few months before Covid, Microsoft Teams got pushed hard in the last quarter of 2019, and then the whole world got locked down and we as businesses were still able to communicate over distance. Until then Teams was a better Skype, but it improved quickly, and became -next to Zoom- the tool to keep businesses alive. They didn't want to kill the economy, but now they got a grab on a large ammount of data processed in Teams calls and Sharepoint, this data can only be analyzed by AI, aka self learning supercomputers.
Don't think for a second Microsoft hasn't access to this data. They claim it's encryptet, yeah, but the hold the encryption keys. The whole way Microsoft Federation Services works gives them the key to the Kingdom. They -and so we- have literally everything. It works both ways.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/solutions/ai/
What AI applications are hosted on Azure can only be speculated, but it could be a not too far fetched scenario that an AI model acting as the sitting President of the US could run on Microsoft servers. We don't know, what this company is capable of. We were tought to hate Microsoft because of their stupid vulnerabilities, because of their monopoly, because of Bill Gates, but in reality, MS rules the world of business data due to M365.
Their newest coup is an AI called Copilot, something that nests deep into M365 tenants to index all of your data for the greater good of improving your daily business. Yeah, for sure.
Long rant with no clear point taken, but we are dealing with stuff we don't want to understand. It's bad, or WHs took over and use all the data for good. We'll find out.
I do AI and ML services for a major integrator. Msft infra in azure for AI is nothing special.
They are big into it, but so is everyone.
Fellow IT pede here, always good to know the whitehats:)
Customers of my company do as well.
"Msft infra in azure for AI is nothing special."
To the public, I agree. But what are they really capable of? I don't have proof of what's going on in the dark, but MS is such a sinister, fraudulent company, I don't trust them as a whole. My boss calls me paranoid, but I leave him with naggin' doubts when we talk about if MS can be trusted. That's part of what he pays me for. BCM is underestimated to many deciders when it comes to MS. Azure down, poof, game over. We made us dependent to a cabal company.
But, it works both ways...
The "we have it all" is because they have it all. Q is a man in the middle. I think Mike Rogers is part of Q. And then, we really have it all.
I agree with you on all points. I just can't see a reason to use MSFT and Azure to do something special for AI. You can do it all and more on prem...worst case, run the model training on a distributed environment like public cloud, then pull it all in house for utilizing said models.
While it takes a lot of hardware, it's not like it takes Azure-scale datacenters to support DSP and Audio AI. Video and further might take more, but it's not at that scale.
Hillary didn't host her email on some large-scale enterprise exchange infrastructure...it was a server.
Same thing would be expected here.
WE HAVE THE BEST ANONS!!!!
Thank you deeply for contributing this. SMEs like you guys make us a force multiplier.
🫡
I’m in IT and have some cloud exp but only dip my toe into the ai/ml space.
This was my thought as well … nothing special.
Additionally it would be INSANELY stupid for them to host such a thing in the cloud. There is no reason to do so cuz it only adds risk with very little to no gain…. Plus a huge compute bill paper trail tying back to somewhere. Best to keep something like this air gapped or at least on prem somewhere MAYBE with emergency level remote access.
AI needs ALOT of computing power, something only large infrastructures, like Azure, can provide. And Azure wouldn't be considered public either
That's not true. It requires a lot of compute to TRAIN a model. And even then many companies use local compute for this stage.
Remember they're arrogant and not the brightest. Pepe Farms remembers the jackass inquiring how to erase data for a "vip" on Reddit
fair point...seems this is a bigger scandal if true to be honest. it's wild to think they'd be that stupid. but fair point.
What if the theory is true that the main cloud AIs are digital ouija boards, i.e. demons or nephilim offspring are what is behind the curtain? Difference between computer answers and really intelligent-looking answers?
might as well be, AI is almost as much smoke and mirrors. It needs to be renamed, it's not intelligent.