They took my money! I’ve actually wondered what happens when it is shown. I’m sure there’s been times when they find out someone cheated, and the winner changed. What happened to the bets that should have one? (Lance Armstrong and Tour de France wins for example?)
LOL. HELL YES. That was the most statistically significant poll of all. Over 1/4million responses. Most polls have 3-5k. This one was from a democrat hyper-biased cuckboi … and Trump, last I saw, had 70+%. That sample size makes a ‘p-value’ near zero with an R value in the high 90s. Thats damned near exact.
As a retire research scientist I was by extension a total statsfag. These polls they are publishing are beyond fraudulent. I am sure it is not a crime, but I can tell you from EXPERIENCE, their ‘observation gathering’ violates every professional standard there is. I would not be shocked to discover they are recycling, repurposing previous ‘polling expeditions’ and substituting names then calling it a ‘valid’ poll.
These polls are bullshit. I will take a twatter poll with 200K respondents all day long over any of those other bullshit, bought and paid for hacks.
I'll also take Vegas odds over polling any day. That said, when they say an "internal poll shows...", I take those a little more seriously, depending upon context. Polling can be done accurately and I believe those are the ones that are more reliable. But all the other external polls, bunk. Rasmussen is probably the most reliable-ish.
There should be a class action on behalf of Las Vegas election betting players against the regime for the 2020 heist.
They took my money! I’ve actually wondered what happens when it is shown. I’m sure there’s been times when they find out someone cheated, and the winner changed. What happened to the bets that should have one? (Lance Armstrong and Tour de France wins for example?)
Lines up with the results of the X poll by Krassenstein.
LOL. HELL YES. That was the most statistically significant poll of all. Over 1/4million responses. Most polls have 3-5k. This one was from a democrat hyper-biased cuckboi … and Trump, last I saw, had 70+%. That sample size makes a ‘p-value’ near zero with an R value in the high 90s. Thats damned near exact.
He’s redoing the poll because he didn’t like the results or the ratio lol.
😂😂🤣🤣😂
He has to block about 200,000 accounts first 😂😂😂
Like this crap: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-may-drop-jd-vance-nikki-haley-ex-clinton-adviser-says-1930495
As a retire research scientist I was by extension a total statsfag. These polls they are publishing are beyond fraudulent. I am sure it is not a crime, but I can tell you from EXPERIENCE, their ‘observation gathering’ violates every professional standard there is. I would not be shocked to discover they are recycling, repurposing previous ‘polling expeditions’ and substituting names then calling it a ‘valid’ poll.
These polls are bullshit. I will take a twatter poll with 200K respondents all day long over any of those other bullshit, bought and paid for hacks.
Agree. They lie about the oversampling and the methodologies as well. << Son of a Research Statistician
I always get amused with the idea of ‘over-sampling’.
“Oh you mean that thing that gets us closer and closer to a near zero P-value??? “. 😂😂😂😂
I'll also take Vegas odds over polling any day. That said, when they say an "internal poll shows...", I take those a little more seriously, depending upon context. Polling can be done accurately and I believe those are the ones that are more reliable. But all the other external polls, bunk. Rasmussen is probably the most reliable-ish.
Yep, Rasmussen and Monmouth.
I thoroughly enjoy their choice of words.
1/3 of the people cant be this stupid!!
shes KKK ,KACKLING KAMELTOE KUNT