Where's the hard work? I read the journal "Galilean Electrodynamics" to keep abreast of the leading-edge thinking, but so far it is only speculation. Frederick Kantor made some great strides in his "Information Mechanics" (now a rare book) but we have no technology from it. I understand there is a lot of vague hope out there, but no one is writing a new "Principia" to show the path. We have a perfectly correct understanding of nuclear fusion, but the search for a practical power source has been going on for essentially my whole lifetime, with paltry results and a continually receding payoff date. You can hope for flying carpets, but for now we can only walk on them.
Check out Hassim Harimein's work, or "The Field" by Lynn McTaggart, Also there is a ton of research in DNA, heart energy and the field by "The HeartMath Institute."
Currently I am trying to digest new revelations from Terrence Howard (yes the actor). I think he might be onto something here and it turns current physics in it's head. Crazy? Maybe. But I am not so sure he isn't correct.
I've had some contact with this subject. The Casimir Force is perfectly explained by quantum physics, but the quantum vacuum does not seem to be treatable as an energy source from the standpoint of thermodynamics. I've read some by Rupert Sheldrake. Kirilian photography is a fascinating physical phenomenon. Unfortunately, my reading list now exceeds my ability to get through it.
So far, I can't see that you have done anything to improve your understanding of physics, except read enthusiast literature. You are just on a soapbox, upbraiding those of us who have worked with applied physics possibly longer than you have been alive. I may even have read about Tesla before you were born. If you can "think" in terms of 5 dimensions, write a book to explain how that thinking works. Do something we can look up to. Don't spend your time looking down on those that do something.
Lol. Your caution heeded my friend. First, i am an old boomer. A great deal of my sources are esoteric and thus exist as theoretical and as far as i know, yet to be proven. Other sources are leading physicists. However, and i am sure you would agree, some gaping holes left in modern physics suggest something is missing/wrong/miscalculated. For instance, no unified theory or "central dogma" or electron behavior or the absence of the forces exerted from the motion of our galaxy included an any if our calculations.
I am far from saying that we Know It All. We don't. And I consider that much of what is taken as discovery (Dark Energy, Dark Matter) is just a hobgoblin of ignorance. Actual discovery (e.g., Halton Arp's observations) are simply ignored. "String theory" is in some dispute as a theory (being unprovable or impossible to disprove). Etc. But I would expect the "forces exerted from the motion of our galaxy" to be imperceptible.
It makes an eloquent point of how a person living in 2D has no idea, no concept and very few ways to even detect the world we live in (3D)... yet, here we are, robust and thriving with all we have constructed (and our tech).
Thus, in-turn, we are limited by these same boundaries in 3D regarding the dimensions above us... yet, they are there, robust and thriving with all they have built (and their tech).
The folks in the 2D world had means to detect whether they were on a curved surface, by geometric measurements. So do we, with respect to 4D curvature. No results. Unless something is susceptible to detection, and thus to measurement, and thus to possibly technology, it is really indistinguishable from nothing.
Where's the hard work? I read the journal "Galilean Electrodynamics" to keep abreast of the leading-edge thinking, but so far it is only speculation. Frederick Kantor made some great strides in his "Information Mechanics" (now a rare book) but we have no technology from it. I understand there is a lot of vague hope out there, but no one is writing a new "Principia" to show the path. We have a perfectly correct understanding of nuclear fusion, but the search for a practical power source has been going on for essentially my whole lifetime, with paltry results and a continually receding payoff date. You can hope for flying carpets, but for now we can only walk on them.
Check out Hassim Harimein's work, or "The Field" by Lynn McTaggart, Also there is a ton of research in DNA, heart energy and the field by "The HeartMath Institute."
Currently I am trying to digest new revelations from Terrence Howard (yes the actor). I think he might be onto something here and it turns current physics in it's head. Crazy? Maybe. But I am not so sure he isn't correct.
I've had some contact with this subject. The Casimir Force is perfectly explained by quantum physics, but the quantum vacuum does not seem to be treatable as an energy source from the standpoint of thermodynamics. I've read some by Rupert Sheldrake. Kirilian photography is a fascinating physical phenomenon. Unfortunately, my reading list now exceeds my ability to get through it.
Expand your thinking. Get out of the 3D contruct and think in terms of 5D. Ever read "Flatland?"
So far, I can't see that you have done anything to improve your understanding of physics, except read enthusiast literature. You are just on a soapbox, upbraiding those of us who have worked with applied physics possibly longer than you have been alive. I may even have read about Tesla before you were born. If you can "think" in terms of 5 dimensions, write a book to explain how that thinking works. Do something we can look up to. Don't spend your time looking down on those that do something.
Lol. Your caution heeded my friend. First, i am an old boomer. A great deal of my sources are esoteric and thus exist as theoretical and as far as i know, yet to be proven. Other sources are leading physicists. However, and i am sure you would agree, some gaping holes left in modern physics suggest something is missing/wrong/miscalculated. For instance, no unified theory or "central dogma" or electron behavior or the absence of the forces exerted from the motion of our galaxy included an any if our calculations.
I am far from saying that we Know It All. We don't. And I consider that much of what is taken as discovery (Dark Energy, Dark Matter) is just a hobgoblin of ignorance. Actual discovery (e.g., Halton Arp's observations) are simply ignored. "String theory" is in some dispute as a theory (being unprovable or impossible to disprove). Etc. But I would expect the "forces exerted from the motion of our galaxy" to be imperceptible.
Flatland is 2D, so what is your point?
It makes an eloquent point of how a person living in 2D has no idea, no concept and very few ways to even detect the world we live in (3D)... yet, here we are, robust and thriving with all we have constructed (and our tech).
Thus, in-turn, we are limited by these same boundaries in 3D regarding the dimensions above us... yet, they are there, robust and thriving with all they have built (and their tech).
The folks in the 2D world had means to detect whether they were on a curved surface, by geometric measurements. So do we, with respect to 4D curvature. No results. Unless something is susceptible to detection, and thus to measurement, and thus to possibly technology, it is really indistinguishable from nothing.