It's a gimmick. I took 30 seconds to review their website. The wording made me suspicious. So I scrolled down and found this:
For most people, it is possible to reduce or even eliminate animals from our diet.
For animal lovers, this means a chance to expand your compassion––you can love all animals. You don't have to push down feelings of guilt or inner conflict when seeing a cute calf, or avoid learning or seeing where your food comes from.
You can live without causing intentional harm to animals.
Elwood’s Organic Dog Meat isn’t real, but we hope you’ll think about any anger it caused. Consider what it'd mean to open your heart to the idea that so-called "food animals" are just as worthy of love and kindness––and maybe that there is no such thing as an "animal meant for food."
That's what they are saying, but everything looks really legit. It's like those things that's right in front of our eyes and we do not see it because we do not trust our own lying eyes.
It is quite easy to create a legitimate-looking website. Heck, we are living in the midst of multiple legitimate-looking psyops designed to divide, distract and destroy our sense of self, our faith and our communities.
Personally I believe they were just trolling for vegan shock value and to provoke thought via controversy... but that's my opinion.
I am not that good to be able to do that. I thought we are being sold Adrenochrome type things designed to make it look like you are crazy to think that.
People attach various degrees of emotional value to some things but not others and use cognitive dissonance to blanket themselves against harsh realities or contradictions in their beliefs.
Now, they are also telling us that it's not real, set up by a vegan to persuade people from meat eating, but the website and everything looks legit. Make your own decision on this.
Most people do go out of their way to help animals that they see suffering.
Most people do already ascribe to vegan or vegan-like ethics. In other words, if they were faced with a choice between having to kill an animal for food or eat a healthy beans-and-rice-and-veggies meal, most people would choose not to kill the animal.
Most people have an "avoid-causing-suffering" point of view. However, they live in a way that is inconsistent with their true values. The world has taught them various ways to overlook this conflict, by 1.) training them to see specific animals as products for their use or consumption, and 2.) hiding how their choices cause so much suffering
Most people who consume animal products want to avoid thinking about these moral conflicts. They want to continue doing what they've been doing and what everyone around them is doing. Having to think about this discrepancy can make them angry (that old cognitive dissonance we all know so well).
The more people spend time thinking about these ideas, the more likely they are to come to the same conclusion. Given the chance, they can easily discover that our society is hypocritical about how we treat animals, that something needs to change.
Because we believe the above, it means we aren't afraid that our approach will make people more likely to eat dogs.
Sure, there's always the teeniest chance we could make people more nihilistic and more uncaring than they already are. But we believe most people really do love animals (especially dogs) and they want to reduce animal suffering––they just don't know how.
It's a gimmick. I took 30 seconds to review their website. The wording made me suspicious. So I scrolled down and found this:
For most people, it is possible to reduce or even eliminate animals from our diet.
For animal lovers, this means a chance to expand your compassion––you can love all animals. You don't have to push down feelings of guilt or inner conflict when seeing a cute calf, or avoid learning or seeing where your food comes from.
You can live without causing intentional harm to animals.
Elwood’s Organic Dog Meat isn’t real, but we hope you’ll think about any anger it caused. Consider what it'd mean to open your heart to the idea that so-called "food animals" are just as worthy of love and kindness––and maybe that there is no such thing as an "animal meant for food."
They're just another vegan propaganda site.
Oh I thought it was a pet food site, meat FOR dogs.
That's what they are saying, but everything looks really legit. It's like those things that's right in front of our eyes and we do not see it because we do not trust our own lying eyes.
It is quite easy to create a legitimate-looking website. Heck, we are living in the midst of multiple legitimate-looking psyops designed to divide, distract and destroy our sense of self, our faith and our communities.
Personally I believe they were just trolling for vegan shock value and to provoke thought via controversy... but that's my opinion.
I am not that good to be able to do that. I thought we are being sold Adrenochrome type things designed to make it look like you are crazy to think that.
I might be wrong, but I think it's a joke to point out the hypocrisy of only eating 'some' animals. why do we eat cows, but not dogs?...
Yes, it is. I wasn't sure because it is not operating here in U.S.
People attach various degrees of emotional value to some things but not others and use cognitive dissonance to blanket themselves against harsh realities or contradictions in their beliefs.
They made it illegal to sell horse meat awhile ago, how is this shit approved?
They said it's fake, but the site all looked very legit. Who knows?
That can’t be real.
Also, do not let Ashlanddog see this post.
Ok. Let's delete this.
Protect Ashlanddog at all costs!!!
Amen.
Now, they are also telling us that it's not real, set up by a vegan to persuade people from meat eating, but the website and everything looks legit. Make your own decision on this.
This site is based on these ideas:
Most people do go out of their way to help animals that they see suffering.
Most people do already ascribe to vegan or vegan-like ethics. In other words, if they were faced with a choice between having to kill an animal for food or eat a healthy beans-and-rice-and-veggies meal, most people would choose not to kill the animal.
Most people have an "avoid-causing-suffering" point of view. However, they live in a way that is inconsistent with their true values. The world has taught them various ways to overlook this conflict, by 1.) training them to see specific animals as products for their use or consumption, and 2.) hiding how their choices cause so much suffering
Most people who consume animal products want to avoid thinking about these moral conflicts. They want to continue doing what they've been doing and what everyone around them is doing. Having to think about this discrepancy can make them angry (that old cognitive dissonance we all know so well).
The more people spend time thinking about these ideas, the more likely they are to come to the same conclusion. Given the chance, they can easily discover that our society is hypocritical about how we treat animals, that something needs to change.
Because we believe the above, it means we aren't afraid that our approach will make people more likely to eat dogs.
Sure, there's always the teeniest chance we could make people more nihilistic and more uncaring than they already are. But we believe most people really do love animals (especially dogs) and they want to reduce animal suffering––they just don't know how.
https://www.elwooddogmeat.com/about
Thank you. I knew they were not operating here in U.S. I saw the countries.