The Coup was in Nov. 2020 and The criminal 'Who' is still in charge. The question is is the US, Military still the defender of The US. Constitution as per their oath?
The marines are supposedly being sent to pick up American citizens because many cannot get a flight out anymore. So we are supposed to be still in an evacuation phase, but it is a carrier strike group, so even those mouths cannot speak the truth.
Constitutionally, that would be Kamala, in the event it's a known thing that the sitting POTUS has stepped aside to medically recover from something. (But we all here know [DS] doesn't follow the Constitution at all, so it's anyone's guess as to who is really calling the shots militarily.)
However, DOD has some unilateral power in where it's forces go and for what reasons, as long as it isn't on any official war footing/capacity. If it's in the name of defense of freedom of navigation treaties, or as a show of force, or peace time training of, for, or with foreign ally forces or prospective ally forces, or for anti-drug/anti-Cartel ops while embedded with DEA, or just normal deployments, then it's fine. POTUS doesn't have to always approve tasking orders. I'm fact, most of the time POTUS wouldn't even be made aware of where all our forces are, or where they're deploying to, or what they're even doing, at any given time.
As for "nuclear forces" being deployed, our CBGs (Carrier Battle Groups) technically, and/or officially haven't carried nuclear weapons onboard in quite a while now. Decades, in fact. The use of the phrase "nuclear forces" is wrong in the context given by "Colonel Towner-Watkins." Just about every USS ship we have are "nuclear powered," and would constitute the use of the phrase "nuclear forces," but that isn't how it's used in the military. The true meaning of "nuclear forces" while used in strategic/tactical ops planning is only used in a weapons platform context, meaning "nuclear capable forces," or "nuclear equipped forces." And this "Colonel" should know that, if this person is, in fact a Colonel.
Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?
Why is that relevant?
To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?
Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.
Think logically about the timing of everything happening.
Note increased military movement.
Note NG deployments starting tomorrow.
Note false flags.
Follow Huma.
Prepare messages of reassurance based on what was dropped here to spread on different platforms.
The calm before the storm.
It appears we currently have 4 Carriers in the Pacific:
Doesn't anyone understand the chain of command?
The pentagon is NOT in the chain of command. The chain goes from CiC to sec'y of defense (optional) to the six theater commanders.
That thing you're all calling potus is NOT CiC. CiC is Trump. Nothing the mil does is without his approval (under Q guidance).
That is why none, repeat NONE, of the munitions allotted to Ukraine ever left port. pentagon "lost" that stuff. It is why the bidan reply to 'when are you sending troops to Ukraine' got the answer, "We're not allowed to send troops." Same answer Pelosi gave.
Don't be fooled by the psyop tomfoolery. bidan CANNOT initiate or respond to nukes. Only the CiC can do that, and that is Trump.
Do you all understand?????? If not, go look it up. Quit getting sucked into this garbage.
The Coup was in Nov. 2020 and The criminal 'Who' is still in charge. The question is is the US, Military still the defender of The US. Constitution as per their oath?
I think the military is split up into segments right now, however I can't give you any kind of proof on the matter, just a gut feeling.
The marines are supposedly being sent to pick up American citizens because many cannot get a flight out anymore. So we are supposed to be still in an evacuation phase, but it is a carrier strike group, so even those mouths cannot speak the truth.
Everyone is expecting a blast, that's for sure.
I hope the innocents can get out of the way.
Constitutionally, that would be Kamala, in the event it's a known thing that the sitting POTUS has stepped aside to medically recover from something. (But we all here know [DS] doesn't follow the Constitution at all, so it's anyone's guess as to who is really calling the shots militarily.)
However, DOD has some unilateral power in where it's forces go and for what reasons, as long as it isn't on any official war footing/capacity. If it's in the name of defense of freedom of navigation treaties, or as a show of force, or peace time training of, for, or with foreign ally forces or prospective ally forces, or for anti-drug/anti-Cartel ops while embedded with DEA, or just normal deployments, then it's fine. POTUS doesn't have to always approve tasking orders. I'm fact, most of the time POTUS wouldn't even be made aware of where all our forces are, or where they're deploying to, or what they're even doing, at any given time.
As for "nuclear forces" being deployed, our CBGs (Carrier Battle Groups) technically, and/or officially haven't carried nuclear weapons onboard in quite a while now. Decades, in fact. The use of the phrase "nuclear forces" is wrong in the context given by "Colonel Towner-Watkins." Just about every USS ship we have are "nuclear powered," and would constitute the use of the phrase "nuclear forces," but that isn't how it's used in the military. The true meaning of "nuclear forces" while used in strategic/tactical ops planning is only used in a weapons platform context, meaning "nuclear capable forces," or "nuclear equipped forces." And this "Colonel" should know that, if this person is, in fact a Colonel.
Lindsey (No Name's Shadow) Graham is all over this!
https://x.com/ColonelTowner/status/1819529511387419060
😶😶😶
Worth mentioning I think that per Q post #38:
Four carriers & escorts in the pacific? Why is that relevant? To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China? Or conversely all for NK? Or all three. Think logically about the timing of everything happening. Note increased military movement. Note NG deployments starting tomorrow. Note false flags. Follow Huma. Prepare messages of reassurance based on what was dropped here to spread on different platforms.
The calm before the storm.
It appears we currently have 4 Carriers in the Pacific:
https://apnews.com/article/aircraft-carriers-usa-navy-e7904f8dd1ba1f65a9d07a31fd9fb8eb
If this is still "the calm", "the storm" is going to prodigious indeed!
that is really very interesting. You should make a post of its own from it, fren.
u/#q38
Doesn't anyone understand the chain of command? The pentagon is NOT in the chain of command. The chain goes from CiC to sec'y of defense (optional) to the six theater commanders. That thing you're all calling potus is NOT CiC. CiC is Trump. Nothing the mil does is without his approval (under Q guidance). That is why none, repeat NONE, of the munitions allotted to Ukraine ever left port. pentagon "lost" that stuff. It is why the bidan reply to 'when are you sending troops to Ukraine' got the answer, "We're not allowed to send troops." Same answer Pelosi gave.
Don't be fooled by the psyop tomfoolery. bidan CANNOT initiate or respond to nukes. Only the CiC can do that, and that is Trump. Do you all understand?????? If not, go look it up. Quit getting sucked into this garbage.