How did Q know that the dems would toss Biden to the curb and replace him? How did Q know they will have HRC and Barry as their team? Kamala and Walz are lightweights in politics and in order for the Dems to have a fighting chance to win they need a better line up. HRC and Barry is that combination that makes the most sense. Also, if you are interested in another Q post that kind of ties this all together read Q post 4014. Lots of goodies in both of these posts. Take your time, read it carefully, especially the last link in 4083.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
I read the link and I disagree with the Hill’s assertion the Constitutional language is vague. If you have already been elected President twice you are Constitutionally ineligible to be President; therefore you are also Constitutionally ineligible to serve as Vice President.
I agree with you. One of the most beautiful things about the constitution is its plain language that anyone can read and understand, no law degree or political acumen required.
That said, muddying the meaning of plain language is an old reliable trick in the DNC's playbook. We even have (unless everything since 2020 is pure show) a confirmed supreme court justice who testified before Congress that she (?) couldn't define what a woman is. Bill Clinton parlayed the definition of "is" into absurdity back when he was in office. And Obama could say he is eligible, since he meets the eligibility standard of Article 1 (35 years of age, resident for over 14 years, and the presumptive natural born language) as long as he is not elected.
If the democrats tried it, we could see a trial to challenge his natural born status. Or a trial for treason. Either one (why not both?) would be quite the show.
Anyone who has taken time to read the constitution can plainly see that it means he's not eligible.
Even so, as John Adams said
If he lived today, he might have added that it also requires honesty and common sense. We all know politicians don't respect any of those virtues, and they have plenty of lawyers happy to pretend they do.
It's an interesting theory, supported to some degree by the Q interpretation. We'll soon see what kind of show we are watching. I'm not making bets either way, but if it happens we can all point to Q having told us first.
(Edit: I still think OP is wrong, and those drops applied to 2020. But I'd be happy to see the trials.)
""Politicians""....
That's one word that I have learned to almost despise, it's almost as bad as Democrat, and I really hate the fact that people keep calling Trump a Politician....
He isn't a Politician as far as I can tell, he really tried his best to MAGA in his Four Years, and to me that makes him a Statesman, not some useless Politician....
well said!