It's going to be difficult to discern the truth, but the bottom line for a lot of people in the UK is the way that the system has been turned on them in favour of 'others'.
The Rotherham grooming gangs are one of the main aspects that has fuelled a lot of resentment that has nothing to do with UN soldiers or whatever, regardless if there are other plans afoot to inflame the situation to justify more draconian laws.
The problem with the latter approach is that whilst the UK population is slow to anger and have been overly tolerant (and there are a lot of simps out there too) there is also a hard-core underbelly that will not go down without a fight - whether that be against Muslim invaders or a foreign army all supported by our traitorous government bootlickers.
Doesn’t it boil down to money? If the governments did not give ANY money in the form of humanitarian housing, food, etc., this would end quickly. The invaders would turn to criminal activity or leave. It’s the people’s responsibility to insure their OWN government does not support the trespassers.
It's going to be difficult to discern the truth, but the bottom line for a lot of people in the UK is the way that the system has been turned on them in favour of 'others'.
Fully agree. That's why I see the "UN Soldiers" narrative as a counter-productive narrative deployment. It murks the water, makes it all "oooh, ahhh, conspiracy theory!" when the obvious plain truth is enough: the govt and their sponsors have been waging war on the people of the country in order to destroy it and the community / national sense that has preserved it for centuries.
It's going to be difficult to discern the truth, but the bottom line for a lot of people in the UK is the way that the system has been turned on them in favour of 'others'.
The Rotherham grooming gangs are one of the main aspects that has fuelled a lot of resentment that has nothing to do with UN soldiers or whatever, regardless if there are other plans afoot to inflame the situation to justify more draconian laws.
The problem with the latter approach is that whilst the UK population is slow to anger and have been overly tolerant (and there are a lot of simps out there too) there is also a hard-core underbelly that will not go down without a fight - whether that be against Muslim invaders or a foreign army all supported by our traitorous government bootlickers.
Doesn’t it boil down to money? If the governments did not give ANY money in the form of humanitarian housing, food, etc., this would end quickly. The invaders would turn to criminal activity or leave. It’s the people’s responsibility to insure their OWN government does not support the trespassers.
Easier said than done, but you're right. Economic power is the one thing in the UK that we have that is a lot more powerful than our political vote.
Fully agree. That's why I see the "UN Soldiers" narrative as a counter-productive narrative deployment. It murks the water, makes it all "oooh, ahhh, conspiracy theory!" when the obvious plain truth is enough: the govt and their sponsors have been waging war on the people of the country in order to destroy it and the community / national sense that has preserved it for centuries.