The government here were explicit straight away that they wanted more facial recognition to stop people travelling who they suspected might be protestors.
There were some local demonstrations and riots but they were a response to local specific crimes as far as I can tell. The newspapers didn't tell us that.
No, I haven't been following it specifically, but I think it's fizzled. According to the government there were supposed to be demonstrations in our city last weekend. My son's respite was cancelled because of it.
I think the government said there would be tens or hundreds of these demonstrations around the country but there weren't. I think they lied. That's what they wanted but it isn't what demonstrators had planned.
Or it's all by design. Then they have an excuse to crack down on the local populace who has the will and determination to fight back. Then only obedient sheep remain.
Technically yes. Despite the jokes. They can keep some guns. Though theyβre restricted as to the kind and Caliber. Theyβre also subject to absurd amounts of regulations. And God help you if you use a firearm to defend yourself or your family
I've got a high capsaicin (2%) 9 ounce unit that will throw bear deterrent 35 feet for 5 seconds. This may help in situations where use of a firearm would be unwise.
This is what I afraid of.
The social chaos is designed to bring in a camera state. Where people are being watched 24/7.
The government here were explicit straight away that they wanted more facial recognition to stop people travelling who they suspected might be protestors.
I was just about to private message you on this. Yeah this was a setup in my view.
I understand some of those men out there want to fight back. But they have to know what the bigger picture is.
If you ask me, this civil war they wanted has been a bust so far.
Yeah.. they are really trying hard. I think the so called "right wing defenders" are paid actors.
Brits are generally pretty tolerant in my experience. Not really given to demonstrating / rioting.
Yeah, the ones that travel probably are.
There were some local demonstrations and riots but they were a response to local specific crimes as far as I can tell. The newspapers didn't tell us that.
How is it out there now? Is it getting anymore calm?
No, I haven't been following it specifically, but I think it's fizzled. According to the government there were supposed to be demonstrations in our city last weekend. My son's respite was cancelled because of it.
I think the government said there would be tens or hundreds of these demonstrations around the country but there weren't. I think they lied. That's what they wanted but it isn't what demonstrators had planned.
"The government wonders why average citizens are taking to the streets to protest."
No, they don't wonder. The government knows exactly why its subjects are rebelling. They just don't care.
Or it's all by design. Then they have an excuse to crack down on the local populace who has the will and determination to fight back. Then only obedient sheep remain.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/britain/body-cameras-for-food-and-retail-workers/
My Cousin swears the U.K is still safe.
Heβs a Door Gunner on a TESCO truck. Why do you ask?
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
Is that 9mm?
Are they allowed to have guns over there?
Technically yes. Despite the jokes. They can keep some guns. Though theyβre restricted as to the kind and Caliber. Theyβre also subject to absurd amounts of regulations. And God help you if you use a firearm to defend yourself or your family
I've got a high capsaicin (2%) 9 ounce unit that will throw bear deterrent 35 feet for 5 seconds. This may help in situations where use of a firearm would be unwise.
I had to dig to find this article, it's an opinion piece saying that maybe they should wear them, not that people are wearing them.
The Lidl thing is two years old.
Isnβt there a restaurant in Texas, where all the waitresses wear pistols?